|
|
 |
 |
|
P U B L I C A T I O N S |
| |
Durnová,
A. & Gottweis, H. (2010): “‘The
choice for death’ and neurology”, Journal of
Neurology,
doi: 10.1007/s00415-010-5554-z |
| Durnová,
A. & Gottweis, H. (2009): “Politik zwischen Tod
und Leben”, in: Weiß, M. G. (Hrsg.): Bios
und Zoe. Die menschliche Natur im Zeitalter ihrer technischen Reproduzierbarkeit,
Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. |
| Durnová,
A. (2008): “Genetic Citizenship And the Power of Intellectual:
the Role of Social Sciences Within the Current Regulations of Genomics”
[Genetické obèanství a moc intelektuála
aneb o roli spoleèenských vìd v souèasném
svìtì regulace genomiky], Filosoficky casopis, 56
(1), Praha. |
| Durnová,
A. (2006): “Argumenter
la mort : La transmission authentique du dialogue intime dans le
discours politique”, Argumentum,
5, Université de Toulouse, AXIS, Romania. |
|
Haddad,
C. (2010), “Zwischen
Labor und Gesellschaft. Zur Biopolitik klinischer Forschung am Menschen”
Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang |
|
| Gottweis,
H. & Fischer, Frank
(eds) The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy as Communicative
Practice. Duham: Duke University Press 2012 |
| Chen, H.
& Gottweis, H., Stem
Cell Treatmens in China: Rethinking the Patient Role in the Global
Bio-Economy, Bioethics, on-line first, doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01929.x,
December 2012. |
| Gottweis,
H. & Lauss, G., Biobank governance: heterogeneous modes
of ordering and democratization, Journal Community Genet, on-line
first, doi 10.1007/s12687-011-0070-0. |
| Gottweis,
H., Gaskell, G. & Starkbaum J. (2011), Connecting the
public with biobank research: reciprocity matters, Nature Reviews
Genetics, 12, November 11, 738-739. |
| Gottweis,
H., Chen, H. & Starkbaum J. (2011), Biobanks and the
phantom public, Hum Genet, 130, April 2011, 433-440. |
| Gottweis,
H. & Gaskell, G. (2011).
Biobanks need publicity, Nature, 471, March 10, 159-160 |
| Gottweis,
H. & Byoungsoo Kim (2010), Explaining Hwang-Gate: South
Korean Identity Politics between Bionationalism and Globalization,
in: Science, Techology & Human Values, 34, 501-524.
|
| Gottweis,
H. (2010), The Endless hESC Controversy in the United States:
History, Context, and Prospects, in Cell Stem Cell, 7,
555-585. |
| Gottweis,
H. & Lauss, G. (2010), “Biobank
Governance in the Post-Genomic Age”, Personalized
Medicine, 7, 1-9. |
Gottweis,
H. & Durnová, A. (2010): “‘The
choice for death’ and neurology”, Journal of
Neurology,
doi: 10.1007/s00415-010-5554-z |
| Gottweis,
H. & Durnová, A. (2009): “Politik zwischen
Tod und Leben”, in: Weiß, M. G. (Hrsg.): Bios
und Zoe. Die menschliche Natur im Zeitalter ihrer technischen Reproduzierbarkeit,
Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. |
| Gottweis,
H. (2009), Self-Governance and the Disapperarance of the
Human Body, in: Eva Sorensen/Peer Triantafillou, The Politics of
Self Governance, Ashgate: Farnham 137-149 |
Gottweis,
H. (2009), Good Biobank Governance: How to Avoid Failure
(in chinesischer Sprache)
in: Medicine & Philosophy, Vol 30, 8-13 |
| Gottweis,
H. & Byoungsoo Kim (2009), Bionationalism, Stem Cells,
BSE, and Web 2.0 in South Korea: Toward the Reconfiguration of Biopolitics,
New Genetics and Society, 28, 23-239. |
| Gottweis,
H., Salter, B. & Waldby, C. (2009): The
Global Politics of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Science: Regenerative
Medicine in Transition, London:
Palgrave, 2008. |
| Gottweis,
H. (2008):
“Participation and the New Governance of Life”,
Biosocieties, 3, 265-285. |
| Gottweis,
H. & Minger, S. (2008): “iPS
Cells and the Politics of Promise”, Nature Biotechnology,
26 (3), 271-272. |
Gottweis,
H. & Petersen, A. (eds., 2008): Biobanks:
Comparative Governance, Routledge, London. |
| Gottweis,
H. & Zatloukal, K. (2007):“Biobank
Governance: Trends and Perspectices”, Pathobiology,
74, 206-211. |
| Gottweis,
H. (2007): “Rhetoric in Policy Analysis”, in:
Fischer, F., Miller, G. J. & Sidney, M. S. (ed.): Handbook
of Public Policy Analysis, London: Taylor & Francis,
237-250. |
| Gottweis,
H. and Prainsack, P. (2006): “Emotion
in political discourse: Contrasting approaches to stem cell governance:
the US, UK, Israel, and Germany”, Regenerative
Medicine, 1 (6): 823-829. |
| Gottweis,
H. & Triendl, R. (2006): “South
Korean Policy Failure and the Hwang Debacle”,
Nature Biotechnology, 24, 141-143. |
| Gottweis,
H. (2006): “Argumentative Policy Analysis”, in:
Pierre, J. & Peters, B. G. (eds.): Handbook
of Public Policy, London: Sage. |
| Gottweis, H. (2005):
“Transnationalizing
recombinant-DNA regulation: Between Asilomar, EMBO, the OECD, and
the European Community”, Science as Culture,
14 (4), 325-338. |
| Gottweis,
H. (2005): “Governing
Genomics in the 21st Century: Between Risk and Uncertainty”,
New Genetics and Society, 24 (2), 175-193. |
| |
Gottweis,
H. (2005): “Emerging Forms of Governance in Genomics
and Post-Genomics: Structures, Trends, Perspectives", in:
Bunton, R. & Peterson, A. (eds.): Genetic
Governance, Health, Risk and Ethics in a Biotech Era, London:
Routledge, 189-206. |
| Dachs, H.,
Gerlich, P., Gottweis, H. et al (eds., 2005): Politik
in Österreich. Ein Handbuch, Manz Verlag. |
|
|
Lauss,
G. (2010). Vom Wert bioinformationeller Privatheit und
der diskursiven Macht ungelöster „Governance-Probleme“
In: Berliner Debatte Initial 21 (2010) 4: 77-89 |
Lauss,
G. (2010). Sharing Orphan Genes: Governing a European-Biobank-Network
for the Rare Disease Community.
In: P. Dabrock, J. Taupitz and J. Ried (Ed.), Trust in Biobanking:
Dealing with Ethical, Legal and Social Issues in an Emerging Field
of Biotechnology. Frankfurt a.M., Springer. (in print) |
| Lauss,
G. (2009): Orchestrating ‘the end of the beginning’:
A political science perspective on transnational biobank infrastructures
in Europe. In: Dierickx K, Borry P (Ed.), New Challenges for Biobanks:
Ethics, Law and Governance. Intersentia, Antwerp, 249-265 |
|
| Mayrhofer,
M. & Prainsack, B. (2009): “Being
A Member of the Club: the Transnational (Self-)Governance of Biobank
Networks”, Risk Assessment and Management, Special
Issue on Inclusive Risk Governance in the Enlarged EU: Challenges
and Opportunities, 12 (1), 64-81. |
|
Metzler,
I. (2012). On why states still matter: In vitro fertilization
embryos between laboratories and state authorities in Italy.
In: N. Vermeulen, S. Tamminen & A. Webster (eds.): Bio-objects:
Life in the 21st Century. Ashgate, 151-170. |
| Metzler,
I. and A. Webster. 2011. "Bio-objects
and their Boundaries: Governing Matters at the Intersection of Society,
Politics, and Science". Croatian Medical Journal,
52: 648-50. |
| Metzler,
I. (2011). Between Church and State: Embryos, Stem Cells
and Citizens in Italian Politics. In: Sheila Jasanoff (ed.): Reframing
Rights: Bioconstitutionalism in the Genetic Age, Cambridge &
London: MIT Press, 105-124. |
|
| Metzler,
I. (2010). “Biomarkers
and their consequences for the biomedical profession: a social science
perspective”, Personalized Medicine, Vol. 7 (4):
407-420. |
Metzler,
I. (2007): “‘Nationalizing
Embryos’: The Politics of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research
in Italy”, BioSocieties, 2 (4), 413-427. |
|
| Naue,
U. und Kroll, T. (2011), "A reply to "The 'demented
other' or simply 'a person'? Extending the philosophical discourse
of Naue and Kroll through the situated self" by John Keady,
Steven Sabat, Ann Johnson and Caroline Swarbrick", Nursing
Philosophy 12, 293 – 296. |
| Naue,
U. (2011): Disability Studies und Menschen mit Lernschwierigkeiten
– Inklusion in Wissenschaft und Forschung. Teilhabe (accepted
for publication) (in German) |
Naue,
U. (2010): Autonomie, Unabhängigkeit und Entscheidungsfreiheit
neu denken. Menschen mit Alzheimer-Krankheit und das Konzept der
eigenen Verantwortung für die Gesundheit. In: Elisabeth List
und Stelzer, Harald (Hg.), Grenzen der Autonomie. Velbrück
Wissenschaft: Weilerwist |
| Naue,
U. und Kroll, T. (2010): Bridging policies and practice:
Challenges and opportunities for the governance of disability and
ageing", International Journal of Integrated Care
10 (Electronic Journal). www.ijic.org
|
| Kroll,
T. & Naue, U. (2010): "The state and context of
evidence productionand knowledge translation in the rehabilitation
of people with Alzheimer’s Disease", Dementia 10 (1),
19-34. http://dem.sagepub.com/content/10/1.toc |
| Naue,
U. (2009): "Österreichische Behindertenpolitik
im Kontext nationaler Politik und internationaler Diskurse zu Behinderung".
SWS-Rundschau Heft 3-09 (49. Jg.), 274-292. |
Naue,
U. & Kroll, T. (2008): “‘The
demented other‘: Identity and differencein dementia”,
Nursing Philosophy, 10, 26 - 33. |
| Naue,
U. & Kroll, T. (2008):“'Self care' und Demenz -
Demente Menschen aktiv in Entscheidungen einbeziehen”, pflegen:
Demenz, 7, 47-49. |
| Naue,
U. (2008): Behindertenpolitik
heute: Zwischen alten Inhalten und neuen Möglichkeiten. Eine
vergleichende Studie [Disability politics and policies today:
Between old paradigms and new possibilities. A comparative study;
written in German], Book on Demand, VDM Verlag. |
| Naue
U. (2008): “‘Self-care
without a self’: Alzheimer’s disease and the concept
of personal responsibility for health”, Medicine,
Health Care and Philosophy, 11 (3), 315-324. |
| Naue
U. (2007): “Zwischen alten Inhalten und neuen Möglichkeiten
– Zur Notwendigkeit einer politikwissenschaftlichen Auseinandersetzung
mit dem Thema Behindertenpolitik”, Kontraste, 4, 9 –
11. |
| Naue,
U. (2006): “Governing
Disability in Austria: Reflections on a Changing Political Field”,
Disability Studies Quarterly, 26 (2). |
| Naue,
U. (2006): “Minderheit
sichtbar machen: Behinderte Menschen, Barrieren und Diskriminierung”,
Stimme von und für Minderheiten, 58. |
| Naue,
U. (2005): “Zur
Analyse der Behindertenpolitik in Österreich aus dem Blickwinkel
der Disability Studies”, Behinderte in Familie, Schule
und Gesellschaft, 5/05, 82-91. |
|
| Prainsack,
B. & Hashiloni-Dolev, Y., (2009): “Faith and Nationhood”,
in: Atkinson, P. Glasner, P. & Lock, M. (eds): Handbook
of Genetics and Society: Mapping the new genomic era, London:
Routledge. (in press). |
| Prainsack,
B., Reardon, J., Hindmarsh, R., Gottweis, H., Naue, U. & Jeantine
E. L. (2008): “Misdirected
precaution”, Nature, 456, 34–35. |
| Prainsack
B., (2008): “Governing through biobanks: Research populations
in Israel”, in: Gottweis, H. & and Petersen, A. (eds):
Biobanks:
Comparative Governance, London: Routledge. |
| Prainsack,
B. (2008): “Forum
on the Nuffield Report The Forensic Use of Bioinformation: Ethical
Issues. An Austrian Perspective”. BioSocieties, 3 (1),
92-97. |
| Prainsack,
B. (2007): “`Natural Forces´- The Regulation
of Genomics in Israel”, in: Glasner, P., Atkinson, P. &
Greenslade, H. (eds): New
Genetics, New Social Formations, London: Routledge, 231-252.
|
| Prainsack,
B. & Gurwitz, D. (2007): “Private
fears in public places? Ethical and regulatory concerns regarding
human genomic databases”. Editorial; Special Focus issue
of Personalized Medicine, 4 (4), 447-452. |
| Prainsack,
B. (2007): “Research
Populations: Biobanks in Israel”, New Genetics & Society,
26, 85-103 . |
| Prainsack,
B., Cherkas, L.F. & Spector, T.D. (2007): “Attitudes
towards human reproductive cloning, assisted reproduction, and gene
selection – A survey of 4,600 British twins”, Human
Reproduction, 22 (8), 2302-2308. |
| Prainsack,
B. & Spector, T. D. (2006): “Twins:
A Cloning Experience”, Social Science & Medicine,
63 (10), 2739-2752. |
Prainsack,
B. & Naue, U. (2006): “Relocating
health governance: personalized medicine in times of `global genes´”,
Personalized Medicine, 3 (3), 349-355. |
Prainsack,
B. (2006): “Negotiating
Life: The Regulation of Embryonic Stem Cell Research and Human Cloning
in Israel”,
Social Studies of Science, 36 (2), 173-205. |
| Prainsack,
B. & Siegal, G. (2006): “The
rise of genetic couplehood? A comparative view of premarital genetic
testing”, BioSocieties, 1 (1), 17-36. |
| Prainsack,
B. & Firestine, O. (2006): “`Science
for survival´: Biotechnology regulation in Israel”,
Science and Public Policy 33 (1), 33-46. |
| Kritzinger,
S., Prainsack, B. & Pülzl, H. (2006): “Veränderung
von nationalen forschungspolitischen Strategien: Eine theoretische
Annäherung“ („Changes in national strategies
of research and science politics: A theoretical discussion“),
Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft (Austrian
Political Science Journal), 35 (1), 75-92. |
| Prainsack,
B. (2006):“Politik und Religion” („Politics
and Religion“), in: Dachs, H. et al (eds), Politik in Österreich.
Das Handbuch (Politics in Austria. The Handbook), Vienna: Manz. |
| Prainsack,
B. & Firestine, O. (2005): “Genetically
Modified Survival. `Red´ and `green´ biotechnology in
Israel”, Science as Culture, 14 (4), 355-372. |
| Prainsack,
B. (2005): “Streitbare
Zellen? Die Politik der Bioethik in Israel” („Contested
Cells? The Politics of Bioethics in Israel“), Leviathan, 1:
69-93 (in German). |
|
Wahlberg,
A. & Streitfellner, T. (2010): "Tourisme de cellules
souches, désespoir et pouvoir des nouvelles thérapies"
in: Leibing, A. & Tournay, V. (eds.) Technologies de l'espoir.
Les débats publics autour de l'innovation médicale
- un objet anthropologique à définir,Québec
: Presses Universitaires de Laval, collection Société,
cultures et santé.
|
|
| Weiß,
M. G. (2009): “What’s wrong with Technology.
Some remarks on Gianni Vattimo’s Interpretation of Science,
Technology an the Media”, in: Benso, S. (ed.): Between Nihilism
and Politics. The Hermeneutics of Gianni Vattimo, New York: Sunny
Press (in print). |
| Weiß,
M. G. (Hrsg., 2009): Bios
und Zoe. Die menschliche Natur im Zeitalter ihrer technischen
Reproduzierbarkeit, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp |
| Weiß,
M. G. ( 2007): “Il corpo infelice di Sartre. Fenomenologia
del corpo in L’essere e il nulla”, in: Pirillo, N. (Hrsg.):
Sartre e la filosofia del suo tempo, Brescia (in print). |
| Weiß,
M. G. (2007): “Subjektivität und Herrschaft im
Kontext von Biopolitik und Gentechnik”,Phänomenologische
Forschungen, 2007, 163-191. |
| Weiß,
M. G. (2006): Gianni
Vattimo. Einführung. Mit einem Interview mit Gianni Vattimo,
Wien: Passagen. |
| Weiß,
M. G. (2005): “Agamben, Giorgio”, in: Die Brockhaus
Enzyklopädie in 30 Bänden, 21. edition, Vol 1, Leipzig:
Brockhaus, 297. |
Weiß,
M. G. (2005): “Die drei Körper des Jean-Paul Sartre.
Zur Phänomenologie des Leibes in Das Sein und das Nichts“,
in: Flatscher, M. & Pöltner, G. (eds.): Heidegger
und die Antike, Frankfurt/M.: Lang, 182-195. |
| Weiß,
M. G. (2005): “Giorgio Agambens Homo Sacer“,
in: Blamauer, M. & Fasching, W. (eds): Phänomenologische
Aufbrüche, Frankfurt/M.: Lang, 129-141. |
| Weiß,
M. G. (2005): „La dissoluzione della natura umana.
Il potenziale critico delle biotecnologie fra emancipazione ed essenzialismo”,
Annali di Studi Religiosi, 219-249. |
| Weiß, M. G. (2005):
„Warum wir im Bett nicht lesen dürfen. Bemerkungen zur
Struktur des Rechts bei Derrida, Benjamin und Agamben“, in:
Zeillinger, P. (ed.): Nach
Derrida. Dekonstruktion in zeitgenössischen Diskursen,
Wien: Turia & Kant, 86-105. |
| |
|
