I wish to repeat that under Fortran 77 all program units are essentially on the same level, even if the main program logically is superior to the subroutines and functions that are called, and even though you could write a call map that looks like a tree. In reality the BLOCK DATA is on a higher level and all the other program units are on the same level, from the Fortran system viewpoint with the main program just a little above. The exception is the so-called statement functions with definitions that have to be first in a program unit directly after the specification and are internal to that unit and therefore is on a logically lower level. Regrettably, the normal Fortran programmer does not use statement functions.
The above means that all routine names are on the same logical level, that means that two different routines, and two different parts of a big program are not permitted to have the same name. Quite often numerical and graphical libraries include thousands of functions and subroutines, and each routine name has to have at most six characters in the name under old Fortran standards. Therefore, it is very strong risk of a conflict of names. This problem could be partially solved by the old statement functions, since these are internal to the respective unit, and therefore different statement functions can have the same name if they are in different units. The disadvantage is that they can only treat what is in only one program line. But they can call each other in such a way that a later statement function can call an earlier statement function, but of course not the opposite.
Now internal functions and internal subroutines are added, giving a greater flexibility. They are specified at the end of each program unit (but not in the BLOCK DATA ) after the new command CONTAINS and before the END. An internal subprogram can have access to the same variables as the unit it belongs to including the possibility to call its other internal subprograms. It is written as an ordinary subprogram, but it is not permitted to have any internal functions or subroutines.
Usual subroutines and functions are as earlier external subroutines and external functions, but there is now a greater reason for this name (that is calling them external) than earlier, since now you have also internal subprograms. Earlier you only had the built in (intrinsic) as an alternative. In addition, the number of intrinsic functions has increased very much, and a few intrinsic subroutines have been added.
In the specification of variables for subprograms we can for every argument now give its INTENT as IN, OUT or INOUT. If IN is valid, then the actual argument can be an expression like X+Y or SIN(X) or a constant like 37, since the value is only to be transferred to the subprogram, but a new value is not to be returned to the calling unit. The variables in this case may not be assigned a new value in the subprogram. If OUT is valid, on the other hand, the actual argument has to be a variable. At entry to the subprogram the variable is at this stage considered to be not defined. The third case covers both possibilities, one value on input and another on output, or possibly the same value. Also in this case the actual argument has to be a variable. If a variable has a pointer attribute then INTENT may not be given. The implementation of INTENT is not yet complete in all compilers.
One use for the new program unit MODULE is to take care of global data and then it replaces the BLOCK DATA, the other use is to make a package of new data type. As a rather large example I try to give a package for interval arithmetic. For each value X then you have an interval (X_lower; X_upper). At the use of the package you want to give only the variable name X when you mean the interval. The variable X is then supposed to be a new data type, interval. The following is on the file interval_arithmetics.f90. Then the routine follows.
MODULE INTERVAL_ARITHMETICS TYPE INTERVAL REAL LOWER, UPPER END TYPE INTERVAL INTERFACE OPERATOR (+) MODULE PROCEDURE INTERVAL_ADDITION END INTERFACE INTERFACE OPERATOR (-) MODULE PROCEDURE INTERVAL_SUBTRACTION END INTERFACE INTERFACE OPERATOR (*) MODULE PROCEDURE INTERVAL_MULTIPLICATION END INTERFACE INTERFACE OPERATOR (/) MODULE PROCEDURE INTERVAL_DIVISION END INTERFACE CONTAINS FUNCTION INTERVAL_ADDITION(A, B) TYPE(INTERVAL) A, B, INTERVAL_ADDITION INTERVAL_ADDITION%LOWER = A%LOWER + B%LOWER INTERVAL_ADDITION%UPPER = A%UPPER + B%UPPER END FUNCTION INTERVAL_ADDITION FUNCTION INTERVAL_SUBTRACTION(A, B) TYPE (INTERVAL) A, B, INTERVAL_SUBTRACTION INTERVAL_SUBTRACTION%LOWER = A%LOWER - B%UPPER INTERVAL_SUBTRACTION%UPPER = A%UPPER - B%LOWER END FUNCTION INTERVAL_SUBTRACTION FUNCTION INTERVAL_MULTIPLICATION(A, B) ! POSITIVE NUMBERS ASSUMED TYPE (INTERVAL) A, B, INTERVAL_MULTIPLICATION INTERVAL_MULTIPLICATION%LOWER = & A%LOWER * B%LOWER INTERVAL_MULTIPLICATION%UPPER = & A%UPPER * B%UPPER END FUNCTION INTERVAL_MULTIPLICATION FUNCTION INTERVAL_DIVISION(A, B) ! POSITIVE NUMBERS ASSUMED TYPE(INTERVAL) A, B, INTERVAL_DIVISION INTERVAL_DIVISION%LOWER = A%LOWER / B%UPPER INTERVAL_DIVISION%UPPER = A%UPPER / B%LOWER END FUNCTION INTERVAL_DIVISION END MODULE INTERVAL_ARITHMETICSAt the compilation of the above the file interval_arithmetics.mod is created, it includes an interesting modified version of the code above. A program that wishes to use this package includes the statement USE INTERVAL_ARITHMETICS first among the specification statement, then the data type INTERVAL and the four arithmetic calculations on this type are directly available. In some cases it is desirable to only include some of the facilities in a module. In this case you use the ONLY attribute within the new USE statement.
USE module_name, ONLY : list_of_chosen_routinesThe following is an example of a very simple main program for the test of interval arithmetics. It is from the file interval.f90.
USE INTERVAL_ARITHMETICS IMPLICIT NONE TYPE (INTERVAL) : : A, B, C, D, E, F A%LOWER = 6.9 ; A%UPPER = 7.1 B%LOWER = 10.9 ; B%UPPER = 11.1 WRITE (*,*) A, B C = A + B ; D = A - B E = A * B ; F = A / B WRITE (*,*) C, D ; WRITE (*,*) E, F ENDRunning this program on a Sun-computer follows:
% f90 interval.f90 interval_arithmetics.f90 interval.f90 interval_arithmetics.f90: % a.out 6.9000001 7.0999999 10.8999996 11.1000004 17.7999992 18.2000008 -4.2000003 -3.7999997 75.2099991 78.8100052 0.6216216 0.6513762 % exitWe compiled with the compiler f90, and the executable program was automatically named a.out. In a module some concepts can be defined as PRIVATE, which means that the program units outside of this module are not able to use this concept. Sometimes an explicit PUBLIC declaration is used, normally PUBLIC is default. Giving the following statements
PRIVATE PUBLIC :: VAR1it follows that all variables except VAR1 are local while VAR1 is global. Note that both these concepts (PUBLIC and PRIVATE ) either can be given as a statement, for example
INTEGER :: IVAR PRIVATE :: IVARor as an attribute
INTEGER, PRIVATE :: IVARand the corresponding for PUBLIC.
(7.2) Complement the modules so that the package makes a
suitable error message when it
divides with an interval that contains zero.
(7.3) Complement also so that the local rounding error at the
operation is handled. ( This is not the case at the moment.)