Readycult
Coliforms
- [PDF]
Microbiology
Catalog, Readycult, Readycult
coliforms ReadyCult
Coliform and E coli test kit for potable and non potable ...
Readycult
Colims 100 (20 Tests) 1 PK,
Readycult
Colims 100 (200 Tests) 10 PK - Rapid
E. coli/coliform Testing in Water with Readycult® Coliforms 100
- READYCULT
Brazilian
Journal of Microbiology - <B>Use of Readycult™ - LMX for ...
Merck
KGaA - Drinking Water - - [PDF]
Merck’s
Lateral Flow Tests For the rapid detection of pathogens,
[PDF]
Folder
Readycult,
[PDF]
Readycult
Sencillo test microbiológico para el agua con ... Merck
spol. s ro,
WARD'S
Natural Science - Readycult® Rapid Coliform Test Kit
; Labcor:
Readycult® Coliforms Test in Finished Water - RK-36152-16
- Willkommen
bei VWR International,
默克光電科技股份有限公司,
McCoy
& McCoy Laboratories, Inc. - Environmental Laboratory -;
EPA
Ground Water & Drinking Water & Analytical Methods for ...
|
FOODMICRO
99
|
AN EVALUATION OF READYCULT SYSTEM FOR DETECTION OF TOTAL COLIFORMS AND E. COLI IN WATER M. MANAFI and H. ROSMANN, Hygiene Institute, University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse
15, A-1095, Vienna, Austria.
Because of the potential consequences of waterborne diseases, microbial
contamination is still considered to be the most critical risk factor in
drinking water quality. The WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality (WHO,
1993) states that it is impractical to monitor drinking water for every
possible microbial pathogen. Monitoring the microbiological quality of
drinking water relies largely on examination for indicators bacteria such
as coliforms, E. coli and enterococci using membrane filtration technique
(MF), the multiple-tube fermentation test (MPN), and the presence-absence
test (P/A). MPN and P/A tests require a minimum of 2 days, followed by
a further 2 days for the confirmatory identification of typical isolates.
There is a need for rapid methods particularly in emergencies, to quickly
determine the indicator bacteria and pathogens in water. As both, coliforms
and E. coli are still important indicators of water pollution, there arises
the necessity to create media which is able to detect both bacteria. This
would then guarantee a better performance of microbiological quality control.
Several attempts have been made to simultaneously detect coliforms and
E. coli and novel methods have been introduced, based on the detection
of ß-D-galactosidase (ßGAL) and ß-D-glucuronidase (GUD)
using fluorogenic and/or chromogenic substrates.
A total of 300 drinking, and surface water samples were collected from different sources in Austria. All samples were transported in an icebox and bacteriological analysis was initiated immediately. Two internationally used standards procedures (the DIN procedure and the E.P.A. precedure) and the Readycult system were used to recover the total coliforms and E. coli in each water sample. To confirm presence of E. coli indole production can be demonstrated using indole reagent. Any positive bottles were subcultured by streaking on eosin methylene blue lactose sucrose agar (EMB). The organisms were isolated and identified using API 20E test strips. The comparison of tested methods for detecting E. coli and coliforms in water samples and number of confirmed positive and false positive samples are presented. Out of 300 samples, a total of 90 (62 E. coli) confirmed vessels were positive by the E.P.A test, 94 (60 E. coli) by the DIN test and 100 (63 E. coli) by the RC system. False-positive results for coliforms and E.coli were by the E.P.A. test 1(1), by the DIN test 1 (2) and by the RC system 3 (0). The false positive results were Aeromonas hydrophila strains. With the EPA method one E. coli strain and with the DIN method two E. coli strains could not be detected. Media containing X-Gal are already used in water monitoring. It was found that coliform strains produced sharp blue colonies on the agar plate because of insolubility of the indigo dye, which does not alter the viability of the colonies. Looking for E. coli and coliforms in watersamples, X-Gal was a faster and more sensitive parameter for total coliforms than gas production from lactose. In the present study, only a few non-coliform bacteria such as strains
of A. hydrophila gave false-positive reactions with X-Gal, which are considered
ubiquitous waterborne organisms and should not be present in drinking water.
On the other hand, adding Cefsulodin at 5 to 10µg/ml to media inhibited
the growth of Aeromonas and Flavobacterium species. Our results showed
that Readycult detected coliforms and E coli in significantly more samples
at 24 hours than standard methods. The detection of total coliforms and
E. coli with Readycult is reduced to 1 day, compared to 4 days by EPA method
and 3 days by DIN method. RC method has proven by experience to be reasonably
adequate for practical purposes. The Readycult system was as sensitive
as Standard Methods and it simultaneously enumerated E. coli and coliforms
in the same analysis. The efficiency and rapidity of the detectable reactions
make this medium a very useful tool in routine water microbiology.
|