AbstractOpen peer commentary on the article “Second-Order Science of Interdisciplinary Research: A Polyocular Framework for Wicked Problems” by Hugo F. Alrøe & Egon Noe. Upshot: I draw connections between the target article and the broader literature on interdisciplinarity, highlighting areas of both agreement and disagreement. Suggestions are made regarding how interdisciplinary research should proceed. CitationSzostak R. (2014) Seeking common ground on the nature of interdisciplinarity. Constructivist Foundations 10(1): 77–78. http://constructivist.info/10/1/077 Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS) Comments: 0To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first. | ||