Volume 10 · Number 1 · Pages 96–104

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

The Uroboros of Consciousness: Between the Naturalisation of Phenomenology and the Phenomenologisation of Nature

Sebastjan Vörös

Download the full text in
PDF (650 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Context: The burgeoning field of consciousness studies has recently witnessed a revival of first-person approaches based on phenomenology in general and Husserlian phenomenology in particular. However, the attempts to introduce phenomenological methods into cognitive science have raised serious doubts as to the feasibility of such projects. Much of the current debate has revolved around the issue of the naturalisation of phenomenology, i.e., of the possibility of integrating phenomenology into the naturalistic paradigm. Significantly less attention has been devoted to the complementary process of the phenomenologisation of nature, i.e., of a (potentially radical) transformation of the theoretical and existential underpinnings of the naturalist framework. Problem: The aim of this article is twofold. First, it provides a general overview of the resurgence of first-person methodologies in cognitive sciences, with a special emphasis on a circular process of naturalising phenomenology and phenomenologising nature. Secondly, it tries to elucidate what theoretical (conceptual) and practical (existential) implications phenomenological approaches might have for the current understanding of nature and consciousness. Results: It is argued that, in order for the integration of phenomenological and scientific approaches to prove successful, it is not enough merely to provide a firm naturalistic grounding for phenomenology. An equally, if not even more important, process of phenomenological contextualisation of science must also be considered, which might have far-reaching implications for its theoretical underpinnings (move from disembodied to embodied models) and our existential stance towards nature and consciousness (cultivation of a non-dual way of being. Implications: The broader theoretical framework brought about by the circular exchange between natural sciences and phenomenology can contribute to a more holistic conception of science, one that is in accord with the cybernetic idea of second-order science and based on a close interconnection between (abstract) reflection and (lived) experience. Constructivist content: The (re)introduction of first-person approaches into cognitive science and consciousness studies evokes the fundamental circularity that is characteristic of second-order cybernetics. It provides a rich framework for a dialogue between science and lived experience, where scientific endeavour merges with the underlying existential structures, while the latter remains reflectively open to scientific findings and proposals.

Key words: Cognitive science, phenomenology, first-person approaches, naturalisation, phenomenologisation, lived experience, non-dualism

Citation

Vörös S. (2014) The uroboros of consciousness: Between the naturalisation of phenomenology and the phenomenologisation of nature. Constructivist Foundations 10(1): 96–104. http://constructivist.info/10/1/096

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Bitbol M. (2012) Neurophenomenology, an Ongoing Practice of/in Consciousness

Froese T., Gould C. & Barrett A. (2011) Re-Viewing from Within: A Commentary on First- and Second-Person Methods in the Science of Consciousness

Vörös S. & Bitbol M. (2017) Enacting Enaction: A Dialectic Between Knowing and Being

Vörös S., Froese T. & Riegler A. (2016) Epistemological Odyssey: Introduction to Special Issue on the Diversity of Enactivism and Neurophenomenology

Weiss M. G. (2013) Non-dualistic Sex. Josef Mitterer’s Non-dualistic Philosophy in the Light of Judith Butler’s (De)Constructivist Feminism

References

Barbaras R. (2008) Life, movement, and desire. Research in Phenomenology 38: 3–17. << Google Scholar

Barbaras R. (2012) The phenomenology of life. Desire as the being of the subject. In: Zahavi D. (ed.) The Oxford handbook of contemporary phenomenology. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 94–111. << Google Scholar

Barbaras R. (2013) The subject’s life and the life of manifestation. Towards a privative biology. Research in Phenomenology 43: 161–176. << Google Scholar

Bernet R. (2013) The body as a “legitimate naturalization of consciousness.” In: Carel H. & Meacham D. (eds.) Phenomenology and naturalism. Examining the relationship between human experience and nature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 43–65. << Google Scholar

Bitbol M. (2012) Neurophenomenology, an ongoing practice of/in consciousness. Constructivist Foundations 7(3): 165–173. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/7/3/165.bitbol

Bitbol M. (2014) La conscience a-t-elle une origine? Flammarion, Paris. << Google Scholar

Braver L. (2007) A thing of this world: A history of continental anti-realism. Northwestern University Press, Evanston IL. << Google Scholar

Chalmers D. J. (1995) Facing up the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2(3): 200–219. << Google Scholar

Chalmers D. J. (1996) The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford. << Google Scholar

Clark A. (2008) Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press, Oxford. << Google Scholar

de Haan S., Rietveld E., Stokhof M. & Denys D. (2013) The phenomenology of deep brain stimulation-induced changes in OCD: An enactive affordance-based model. Frontiers in Human Neroscience 7: 653. Available at http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00653/pdf

De Preester H. (2002) Naturalizing Husserlian phenomenology: An introduction. Psychoanalytische Perspectieven 20(4): 633–647. << Google Scholar

Dennett D. (1987) Intentional stance. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Dennett D. (1991) Consciousness explained. Little, Brown and Company, Boston. << Google Scholar

Depraz N., Varela F. J. & Vermersch P. (2003) On becoming aware. John Benjamin, Amsterdam. << Google Scholar

Dupuy J.-P. (2009) On the origins of cognitive science: The mechanization of mind. MIT Press, Cambrdige MA. << Google Scholar

Eslava C. (2014) Graphic meditation. Un certain plaisir caché dans l’expérience d’ouverture dimensionnelle. In: Vion-Dury J. & Xerri C. (ed.) Plaisir Esthétique dans les Arts. L’Harmattan, Paris: 101–120. << Google Scholar

Fasching W. (2008) Consciousness, self-consciousness, and meditation. Phenomenology and Cognitive Science 7: 463–483. << Google Scholar

Fingerhut J., Hufendiek R. & Wild M. (2013) Philosophie der Verkörperung: Grundlagentexte zu einer aktuellen Debatte. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. << Google Scholar

Flanagan O. (1992) Consciousness reconsidered. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Flanagan O. (2006) Varieties of naturalism. In: Clayton P. (ed.) Oxford companion to religion and science. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 430–452. << Google Scholar

Foerster H. von & Glasersfeld E. von (1999) Wie wir uns erfunden: Eine Autobiographie des radikalen Konstruktivismus. Carl-Auer Verlag, Heidelberg. << Google Scholar

Foerster H. von & Poerksen B. (2002) Understanding systems. Conversations on epistemology and ethics. Kluwer, New York. German original: Foerster H. von & Pörksen B. (1998) Wahrheit ist die Erfindung eines Lügners. Gepräche für Skeptiker. Carl-Auer, Heidelberg. << Google Scholar

Froese T. (2010) From cybernetics to second-order cybernetics: A comparative analysis of their central ideas. Constructivist Foundations 5(2): 75–85. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/5/2/075.froese

Froese T. (2011) From second-order cybernetics to enactive cognitive science: Varela’s turn from epistemology to phenomenology. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 28(6): 631–645. << Google Scholar

Gaebler M., Lamke J.-P., Daniels J. K. & Walter H. (2013) Phenomenal depth – A common phenomenological dimension in depression and depersonalization. Journal of Consciousness Studies 20(7–8): 269–291. << Google Scholar

Gaitsch P. (2014) Eric Weils Logik der Philosophie. Eine phänomenologische Relektüre. Alber, Freiburg. << Google Scholar

Gallagher S. & Brøsted Sørensen J. (2006) Experimenting with phenomenology. Consciousness and Cognition 15(1): 119–134. << Google Scholar

Gallagher S. & Hutto D. (2008) Understanding others through primary interaction and narrative practice. In: Zlatev J., Racine T., Sinha C. & Itkonen E. (eds.) The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity. John Benjamins, Amsterdam: 119–134. << Google Scholar

Gallagher S. & Varela F. J. (2003) Redrawing the map and resetting the time: Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29(sup1): 93–132. << Google Scholar

Gallagher S. & Zahavi D. (2008) The phenomenological mind: An introduction to philosophy of mind and cognitive science. Routledge, London. << Google Scholar

Gallagher S. (1997) Mutual enlightenment: Recent phenomenology in cognitive science. Journal of Consciousness Studies 4(3): 195–214. << Google Scholar

Gallagher S. (2003) Phenomenology and experimental design. Journal of Consciousness Studies 10(9–10): 85–99. << Google Scholar

Gallagher S. (2004) Neurocognitive models of schizophrenia: A neurophenomenological critique. Psychopathology 37: 8–19. << Google Scholar

Gallagher S. (2012) On the possibility of naturalizing phenomenology. In: Zahavi D. (ed.) The Oxford handbook of contemporary phenomenology. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 70–93. << Google Scholar

Gardner H. (1985) The mind’s new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. Basic Books, New York. << Google Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (1998) The incommensurability of scientific and poetic knowledge. World Futures 53(1): 19–25. Available at http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/199

Glendinning S. (2007) In the name of phenomenology. Routledge, New York. << Google Scholar

Hacker P. (2010) Hacker’s challenge. The Philosopher’s Magazine 51(51): 23–32. << Google Scholar

Hanna R. & Thompson E. (2003) The mind–body–body problem. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum 7(1): 23–42. << Google Scholar

Hass L. (2008) Merleau-Ponty’s philosophy. Indiana University Press, Bloomington. << Google Scholar

Haugeland J. (1985) Artificial intelligence: The very idea. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Heidegger M. (1978) Being and time. Blackwell Publishing, Malden MA. German original was published in 1927. << Google Scholar

Heidegger M. (1982) The basic problems of phenomenology. Indiana University Press, Bloomington. << Google Scholar

Heidegger M. (1989) Nietzsches Lehre vom Willen zur Macht als Erkenntnis. Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main. << Google Scholar

Henry M. (1973) The essence of manifestation. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague. French original published in 1963 << Google Scholar

Hurley S. (1998) Consciousness in action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Husserl E. (1970) The crisis of the European sciences and transcendental philosophy. Northwestern University Press, Evanston IL. Originally published in German as: Husserl E. (1954) Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Nijhoff, Haag. << Google Scholar

Husserl E. (1982) Cartesian meditations. Translated by D. Cairns. Seventh Impression. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Originally published in 1960. << Google Scholar

Husserl E. (1983) Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. First Book (Ideas 1) Translated by F. Kersten. Martinus nijhoff, The Hague. << Google Scholar

Husserl E. (2001) Analyses concerning passive and active synthesis. Lectures on transcendental logic. Translated by Anthony J. Steinbock. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. << Google Scholar

Hylton P. (1990) Russell, idealism, and the emergence of analytic philosophy. Clarendon, New York. << Google Scholar

Jackendoff R. (1987) Consciousness and the computational mind. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Jackson F. (2002) Epiphenomenal qualia. In: Chalmers D. J. (ed.) Philosophy of mind: Classical and contemporary readings. Oxford University Press, New York: 273–280. Originally published in 1982. << Google Scholar

Jonas H. (1966) The phenomenon of life. Toward a philosophical biology. Harper & Row, New York. << Google Scholar

Kiverstein J. (2012) What is Heideggerian cognitive science? In: Kiverstein J. & Wheeler M. (eds.) Heidegger and cognitive science. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire: 1–61. << Google Scholar

Le Van Quyen M. & Petitmengin C. (2002) Neural dynamics and conscious experience: An example of reciprocal causation before epileptic seizures. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1: 169–180. << Google Scholar

Levine J. (2002) Materialism and qualia: Explanatory gap. In: Chalmers D. J. (ed.) Philosophy of mind: Classical and contemporary readings. Oxford University Press, New York: 354–361. Originally published in 1983. << Google Scholar

Loy D. (1997) Nonduality. A study in comparative philosophy. Humanity Books, New York. << Google Scholar

Lutz A. & Thompson E. (2003) Neurophenomenology: Integrating subjective experience and brain dynamics in the neuroscience of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 10(9–10): 31–52. << Google Scholar

Lutz A., Lachaux J.-P., Martinerie J. & Varela F. J. (2002) Guiding the study of brain dynamics using first-person data: synchrony patterns correlate with on-going conscious states during a simple visual task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 99: 1586–1591. << Google Scholar

Marbach E. (1993) Mental representations and consciousness: Towards a phenomenological theory of representation and reference. Kluwer Academy Publishers, Dordrecht. << Google Scholar

Marbach E. (2003) On bringing consciousness into the house of science – With the help of Husserlian phenomenology. Angelaki 10: 145–162. << Google Scholar

Marbach E. (2010) So you want to naturalize consciousness? – Why, why not? – But how? – Husserl meeting some offspring. In: Ierna C., Jacobs H. & Mattens F. (eds.) Philosophy, phenomenology, sciences. Springer, Dordrecht: 391–404. << Google Scholar

Meillassoux Q. (2009) After finitude. An essay on the necessity of contingency. Continuum, London. << Google Scholar

Meixner U. (2010) Husserls transzendentaler Idealismus als Supervenienzthese. Ein interner Realismus. In: Frank M. & Weidtmann N. (eds.) Husserl und die Philosophie des Geistes. Suhrkamp, Berlin: 178–208. << Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty M. (1945) Phénoménologie de la perception. Gallimard, Paris. << Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty M. (1962) Phenomenology of perception. Translated by C. Smith. The Humanities Press, New York. French original published in 1945. << Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty M. (1963) The structure of behavior. Dusquesne University Press, Pittsburgh. << Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty M. (1964) The child’s relation with others. Translated by W. Cobb. In: Merleau-Ponty M., The primacy of perception and other essays on phenomenological psychology, the philosophy of art, history and politics. Edited by James M. Edie. Northwestern University Press, Evanston IL: 96–155. << Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty M. (1970) The concept of nature I: Themes from the lectures at the Collège de France 1952–1960. Northwestern University Press, Evanston IL. << Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty M. (1983) The structure of behaviour. Duquesne, Pittsburgh. << Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty M. (2002) Phenomenology of perception. Routledge, London. Originally published in French as: Merleau-Ponty M. (1945) Phenomenologie de la perception. Callimard, Paris. << Google Scholar

Metzinger T. (1997) Editorial. Journal of Consciousness Studies 4(5–6): 385–388. << Google Scholar

Metzinger T. (2003) Being no one. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Moran D. (2013) Let’s look at it objectively – Why phenomenology cannot be naturalized. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 72: 89–115. << Google Scholar

Nachmanovitch S. (1990) Free play improvisation in life and art. Tarcher Penguin, New York. << Google Scholar

Nagel T. (1974) What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review 83(4): 435–450. << Google Scholar

Nagel T. (1986) The view from nowhere. Oxford University Press, Oxford. << Google Scholar

Papineau D. (2007) Naturalism. In: Zalta E. N. (ed.) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Available at http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/naturalism

Petitmengin C. & Bitbol M. (2009) The validity of first-person descriptions as authenticity and coherence. Journal of Consciousness Studies 16 (11–12): 363–404. << Google Scholar

Petitmengin C. (2006) Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person. An interview method for the science of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science 5: 229–269. << Google Scholar

Petitmengin C., Remillieux A., Cahour B. & Carter-Thomas S. (2013) A gap in Nisbett and Wilson’s findings? A first-person access to our cognitive processes. Consciousness and Cognition 22(2): 654–669. << Google Scholar

Petitot J., Varela F. J., Pachoud B. & Roy J.-M. (1999) Naturalizing phenomenology: Issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA. << Google Scholar

Price D., Barrel J. & Rainville P. (2002) Integrating experiential-phenomenological methods and neuroscience to study neural mechanisms of pain and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 11: 598–608. << Google Scholar

Ravn S. (2010) Sensing weight in movement. Journal of Dance & Somatic Practices 2(1): 21–34. << Google Scholar

Schewel B. (2013) Naturalizing phenomenology, Phenomenologizing nature. Radical Orthodoxy 1(3): 504–515. << Google Scholar

Schmicking D. (2010) A toolbox of phenomenological methods. In: Gallagher S. & Schmicking D. (eds.) Handbook of phenomenology and cognitive science. Springer, Dordrecht: 35–55. << Google Scholar

Scott B. (2004) Second-order cybernetics: An historical introduction. Kybernetes 33 (9/10): 1365–1378. << Google Scholar

Smart J. J. C. (1959) Sensations and Brain Processes. Philosophical Review 68: 141–156. << Google Scholar

Stephan A. (2005) Emergente Eigenschaften. In: Krohs U. & Toepfer G. (eds.) Philosophie der Biologie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main: 88–105. << Google Scholar

Stuart S. A. J. (2010) Enkinaesthesia, biosemiotics and the ethiosphere. In: Cowley S. J., Major J. C., Steffensen S. V. & Dinis A. (eds.) Signifying bodies: Biosemiosis, interaction and health. Portuguese Catholic University, Braga: 305–330. << Google Scholar

Stuart S. A. J. (2012) Enkinaesthesia: The essential sensuous background for co-agency. In: Radman Z. (ed.) The background: Knowing without thinking. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke: 167–186. << Google Scholar

Stuart S. A. J. (2013) The union of two nervous systems: Neurophenomenology, enkinaesthesia, and the Alexander technique. Constructivist Foundations 8(3): 314–323. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/8/3/314.stuart

Suzuki S. (1995) Zen mind, beginner’s mind. Weatherhill, New York. << Google Scholar

Thompson E. (2004) Life and mind: From autopoiesis to neurophenomenology. Phenomenology and Cognitive Sciences 3: 381–398. << Google Scholar

Thompson E. (2007) Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of the mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Thompson E. (2011) Living ways of sense-making. Philosophy Today 55(Supplement): 114–123. << Google Scholar

Varela F. J. & Shear J. (eds.) (1999) The view from within: First-person approaches to the study of consciousness. Imprint Academic, Thorverton UK. << Google Scholar

Varela F. J. (1976) Not one, not two. Coevolution Quarterly 12: 62–67. << Google Scholar

Varela F. J. (1995) The re-enchantment of the concrete. In: Brooks L. & Brooks R. (ed.) The artificial life route to artificial intelligence: Building embodied, situated agents. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ: 11–20. << Google Scholar

Varela F. J. (1996) Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies 3(4): 330–349. << Google Scholar

Varela F. J. (1996) The early days of autopoiesis: Heinz and Chile. Systems Research 13(3): 407–416. << Google Scholar

Varela F. J., Thompson E. & Rosch E. (1991) The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Vörös S. (2013) Demystifying consciousness with mysticism. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems 11(4): 391–399. << Google Scholar

Vörös S. (2013) Podobe neupodobljivega: (Nevro)znanost, fenomenologija, mistika [The images of the unimaginable: (Neuro)science, phenomenology, mysticism]. KUD Logos, Ljubljana. << Google Scholar

Vermersch P. (2011) Husserl the great unrecognized psychologist. A reply to Zahavi. Journal of Consciousness Studies 18(2): 20–23. << Google Scholar

Ward D. & Stapleton M. (2012) Es are good: Cognition as enacted, embodied, embedded, affective and extended. In: Paglieri F. (ed.) Consciousness in Interaction: The role of the natural and social context in shaping consciousness. John Benjamins, Amsterdam: 89–104. << Google Scholar

Weber A. & Varela F. J. (2002) Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1 (2). << Google Scholar

Weber M. (2005) Supervenienz und Physikalismus. In: Krohs U. & Toepfer G. (ed.) Philosophie der Biologie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main: 71–87. << Google Scholar

Zahavi D. (2004) Phenomenology and the project of naturalization. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science 3: 331–347. << Google Scholar

Zahavi D. (2007) Killing the straw man: Dennett and phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science 6: 21–43. << Google Scholar

Zahavi D. (2010) Naturalized phenomenology. In: Gallagher S. & Schmicking D. (eds.) Handbook of phenomenology and cognitive science. Springer, Dordrecht: 3–19. << Google Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.