Open peer commentary on the article “Designing Academic Conferences in the Light of Second-Order Cybernetics” by Laurence D. Richards. Upshot: I relate my own experiences of participating in and organizing conversational conferences to Richards’s discussion. Perhaps contradictory to Larry’s argument, I believe that in order for conversational conferences to be successful, they require some rules, structure and some hierarchy. Below, I would like to add reflections from own experience and also point to some guidelines worth considering, taken from Callaos’s recommendations.
Hohl M. (2015) Desires, constraints and designing second-order cybernetic conferences. Constructivist Foundations 11(1): 84–85. http://constructivist.info/11/1/084
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.