Volume 11 · Number 2 · Pages 204–212

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

Lived Experience and Cognitive Science Reappraising Enactivism’s Jonasian Turn

Mario Villalobos & Dave Ward

Download the full text in
PDF (1443 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Context: The majority of contemporary enactivist work is influenced by the philosophical biology of Hans Jonas. Jonas credits all living organisms with experience that involves particular “existential” structures: nascent forms of concern for self-preservation and desire for objects and outcomes that promote well-being. We argue that Jonas’s attitude towards living systems involves a problematic anthropomorphism that threatens to place enactivism at odds with cognitive science, and undermine its legitimate aims to become a new paradigm for scientific investigation and understanding of the mind. Problem: Enactivism needs to address the tension between its Jonasian influences and its aspirations to become a new paradigm for cognitive science. By relying on Jonasian phenomenology, contemporary enactivism obscures alternative ways in which phenomenology can be more smoothly integrated with cognitive science. Method: We outline the historical relationship between enactivism and phenomenology, and explain why anthropomorphism is problematic for a research program that aspires to become a new paradigm for cognitive science. We examine the roots of Jonas’s existential interpretation of biological facts, and describe how and why Jonas himself understood his project as founded on an anthropomorphic assumption that is incompatible with a crucial methodological assumption of scientific enquiry: the prohibition of unexplained natural purposes. We describe the way in which phenomenology can be integrated into Maturana’s autopoietic theory, and use this as an example of how an alternative, non-anthropomorphic science of the biological roots of cognition might proceed. Results: Our analysis reveals a crucial tension between Jonas’s influence on enactivism and enactivism’s paradigmatic aspirations. This suggests the possibility of, and need to investigate, other ways of integrating phenomenology with cognitive science that do not succumb to this tension. Implications: In light of this, enactivists should either eliminate the Jonasian inference from properties of our human experience to properties of the experience of all living organisms, or articulate an alternative conception of scientific enquiry that can tolerate the anthropomorphism this inference entails. The Maturanian view we present in the article’s final section constitutes a possible framework within which enactivist tools and concepts can be used to understand cognition and phenomenology, and that does not involve a problematic anthropomorphism. Constructivist content: Any constructivist approach that aims for integration with current scientific practice must either avoid the type of anthropomorphic inference on which Jonas bases his work, or specify a new conception of scientific enquiry that renders anthropomorphism unproblematic.

Key words: Human experience, living beings, autopoietic theory, enactivism, Hans Jonas, phenomenology.

Citation

Villalobos M. & Ward D. (2016) Lived experience and cognitive science reappraising enactivism’s jonasian turn. Constructivist Foundations 11(2): 204–212. http://constructivist.info/11/2/204

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Werner K. (2017) Coordination Produces Cognitive Niches, not just Experiences: A Semi-Formal Constructivist Ontology Based on von Foerster

Vörös S. & Riegler A. (2017) A Plea for not Watering Down the Unseemly: Reconsidering Francisco Varela’s Contribution to Science

Ward D. & Villalobos M. (2016) Authors’ Response: Enactivism, Cognitive Science, and the Jonasian Inference

Fultot M. F., Nie L. & Carello C. (2016) Perception-Action Mutuality Obviates Mental Construction

Matyja J. R. & Schiavio A. (2013) Enactive Music Cognition: Background and Research Themes

References

Bailly F. & Longo G. (2006) Mathématiques et sciences de la nature. La singularité physique du vivant. Hermann, Paris. << Google Scholar

Barandiaran X. E. & Egbert M. D. (2014) Norm-establishing and norm-following in autonomous agency. Artificial Life 20: 5–28. << Google Scholar

Barandiaran X. E. (2016) Autonomy and enactivism. Towards a theory of sensorimotor autonomous agency. Topoi. In: Press. Available at http://cepa.info/2471

Barandiaran X. E., Di Paolo E. & Rohde M. (2009) Defining agency: Individuality, normativity, asymmetry and spatio-temporality in action. Journal of Adaptive Behavior 17(5): 367–386. Available at http://cepa.info/324

Barbaras R. (2008) Life, movement, and desire. Research in Phenomenology 38: 3–17. << Google Scholar

Barrett N. F. (2015) The normative turn in enactive theory: An examination of its roots and implications. Topoi. Online first. Available at http://cepa.info/2473

Bateson G. (1972) Steps to an ecology of mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. << Google Scholar

Berthoz A. & Petit J.-L. (eds.) (2014) Complexité-simplexité. Collège de France, Paris. << Google Scholar

Berthoz A. (2009) La simplexité. Odile Jacob, Paris. << Google Scholar

Berthoz A. (2013) La vicariance. Odile Jacob, Paris. << Google Scholar

Boden M. (2000) Autopoiesis and life. Cognitive Science Quarterly 1: 117–145. Available at http://cepa.info/2469

Capra F. (1996) The web of life: A new understanding of living systems. Anchor Books, New York. << Google Scholar

Cowley S. J. & Gahrn-Andersen R. (2015) Deflating autonomy: Human interactivity in the emerging social world. Intellectica 63: 49–63. << Google Scholar

Cuffari E. C., Di Paolo E. & De Jaegher H. (2014) From participatory sense-making to language: There and back again. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 14(4): 1089–1125. Available at http://cepa.info/2516

Davis B. (1996) Teaching mathematics: Toward a sound alternative. Garland, New York. << Google Scholar

De Jaegher H. & Di Paolo E. (2007) Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6: 485–507. Available at http://cepa.info/2387

De Jesus P. (2015) Autopoietic enactivism, phenomenology and the deep continuity between life and mind. Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Online first. Available at http://cepa.info/2385

Di Paolo E. A. (2003) Organismically-inspired robotics: Homeostatic adaptation and teleology beyond the closed sensorimotor loop. In: Murase K. & Asakura T. (eds.) Dynamical Systems Approach to Embodiment and Sociality. Advanced Knowledge International, Adelaide: 19–42. Available at http://cepa.info/2514

Di Paolo E. A. (2005) Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4(4): 429–452. Available at http://cepa.info/2269

Di Paolo E. A. (2009) Extended life. Topoi 28(1): 9–21. Available at http://cepa.info/322

Di Paolo E. A. (2009) Overcoming autopoiesis. In: Magalhães R. & Sanchez R. (eds.) Autopoiesis in organization: Theory and practice. Emerald, Bingley: 43–68. Available at http://cepa.info/2366

Di Paolo E. A., Rohde M. & De Jaegher H. (2010) Horizons for the enactive mind: Values, social interaction, and play. In: Stewart J., Gapenne O. & Di Paolo E. A. (eds.) Enaction: Towards a new paradigm for cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge MA: 33–87. Available at http://cepa.info/2413

Di Pellegrino G., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Gallese V. & Rizzolatti G. (1992) Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research 91: 176–180. << Google Scholar

Dretske F. (1981) Knowledge and the flow of information. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Dreyfus H. L. (1988) Husserl’s epiphenomenology. In: Otto H. R. & Tuedio J. A. (eds.) Perspectives on Mind. Reidel, Dordrecht: 85–104. << Google Scholar

Froese T. & Di Paolo E. A. (2009) Sociality and the life-mind continuity thesis. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8: 439–436. << Google Scholar

Froese T. & Di Paolo E. A. (2011) The enactive approach: Theoretical sketches from cell to society. Pragmatics and Cognition 19(1): 1–36. Available at http://cepa.info/2367

Froese T. & Stewart J. (2010) Life after Ashby: Ultrastability and the autopoietic foundations of biological autonomy. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 17(4): 7–50. Available at http://cepa.info/387

Froese T. & Ziemke T. (2009) Enactive artificial intelligence: Investigating the systemic organization of life and mind. Artificial Intelligence 173(3–4): 466–500. Available at http://cepa.info/279

Froese T. (2011) Breathing new life into cognitive science. AVANT. The Journal of the Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard 2(1): 113–129. Available at http://cepa.info/412

Gaitsch P. (2014) The small change of non-idealistic correlationism. Constructivist Foundations 10(1): 106–108. Available at Available at http://constructivist.info/10/1/106

Gallagher S. (2012) On the possibility of naturalizing phenomenology. In: Zahavi D. (ed.) The Oxford handbook of contemporary phenomenology. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 70–93. Available at http://cepa.info/2279

Graziano M. S. A. (2009) The intelligent movement machine: An ethological perspective on the primate motor system. Oxford University Press, Oxford. << Google Scholar

Graziano M. S. A. (2015) Ethological action maps: A paradigm shift for the motor cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20(2): 121–132. << Google Scholar

Harvey M. I., Gahrn-Andersen R. & Steffensen S. V. (2016) Interactivity and enaction in human cognition. Constructivist Foundations 11(2): THIS VOLUME. Available at http://constructivist.info///000

Hauser M. D., Chomsky N. & Fitch W. T. (2002) The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298(5598): 1569–1579. << Google Scholar

Hösle V. (2008) Hans Jonas’s position in the history of German philosophy. In: Tirosh-Samuelson H. & Wiese C. (eds.) The legacy of Hans Jonas. Brill, Leiden: 19–38. << Google Scholar

Heidegger M. (1962) Being and time. Blackwell, Oxford. << Google Scholar

Hodges B. (2009) Ecological pragmatics: Values, dialogical arrays, complexity, and caring. Pragmatics & Cognition 17(3): 628–625. << Google Scholar

Husserl E. (1973) Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Zweiter Teil: 1921–1928. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague. << Google Scholar

Hutto D. D. & Myin E. (2013) Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Jonas H. (1966) The phenomenon of life. Toward a philosophical biology. Harper & Row, New York. Reprinted in 2000 by Northwestern University Press. << Google Scholar

Kaas J. H., Gharbawie O. A. & Stepniewska I. (2013) Cortical networks for ethologically relevant behaviors in primates. American Journal of Primatology 75(5): 407–414. << Google Scholar

Köchy K. (2008) Biophilosophie zur Einführung. Junius, Hamburg. << Google Scholar

Kennedy J. S. (1992) The new anthropomorphism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Kuhn T. (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. << Google Scholar

Kyselo M. (2014) The body social: An enactive approach to the self. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 986. Available at http://cepa.info/2517

Lettvin J. Y., Maturana H. R., McCulloch W. S. & Pitts W. H. (1959) What the frog’s eye tells the frog’s brain. Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers (IRE) 47(11): 1940–1951. Available at http://cepa.info/518

Lettvin J. Y., Maturana H. R., Pitts W. H. & McCulloch W. S. (1961) Two remarks on the visual system of the frog. In: Rosenblith W. A. (ed.) Sensory communications. MIT Press, Cambridge MA and Wiley, New York: 757–776. << Google Scholar

Lindberg S. (2005) Hans Jonas’s theory of life in the face of responsibility. In: Lembeck K.-H., Mertens K. & Orth E. W. (eds.) Phänomenologische Forschungen. Felix Meiner Verlag, Hamburg: 175–192. << Google Scholar

Lipps T. (1903) Einfühlung, innere Nachahmung, und Organempfindung. Archiv für die Gesamte Psychologie I (2), W. Engelmann, Leipzig: 185–204. << Google Scholar

Longo G. & Montévil M. (2012) Randomness increases order in biological evolution. In: Dinneen M., Khoussainov B. & Nies A. (eds.) Computation, physics and beyond. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7160, Springer, Berlin: 289–308. << Google Scholar

Maldonado P. E., Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1988) Frontal and lateral visual system in birds. Frontal and lateral gaze. Brain, Behavior and Evolution 32(1): 57–62. << Google Scholar

Margulis L. & Sagan D. (1995) What is life? Simon and Schuster, New York. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. R. & Dávila X. Y. (2015) El árbol del vivir. Edited by Mauricio Vlastelica Panel. MVP Editores, Santiago Chile. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. R. & Frenk S. (1963) Directional movement and horizontal edge detectors in the pigeon retina. Science 142(3594): 977–979. Available at http://cepa.info/527

Maturana H. R. & Frenk S. (1965) Synaptic connections of the centrifugal fibers in the pigeon retina. Science 150(3694): 359–361. Available at http://cepa.info/533

Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Reidel, Dordrecht. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1982) Color-opponent responses in the avian lateral geniculate: A study in the quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Brain Research 247(2): 227–241. Available at http://cepa.info/564

Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1987) The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Shambhala, Boston. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1992) The tree of knowledge. Revised edition. Shambhala, Boston MA. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. R. (1959) Number of fibres in the optic nerve and the number of ganglion cells in the retina of Anurans. Science 183 (4672): 1406–1407. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. R. (1978) Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In: Miller G. & Lenneberg E. (eds.) Psychology and biology of language and thought: Essays in honor of Eric Lenneberg. Academic Press, New York: 27–63. Available at http://cepa.info/549

Maturana H. R. (1988) Reality: The search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument. Irish Journal of Psychology 9(1): 25–82. Available at http://cepa.info/598

Maturana H. R. (1990) Science and daily life: The ontology of scientific explanations. In: Krohn W., Kuppers G. & Nowotny H. (eds.) Selforganization: Portrait of a scientific revolution. Springer: 12–35. Available at http://cepa.info/607

Maturana H. R. (1995) Biology of self-consciousness. In: Tratteur G. (ed.) Consciousness: Distinction and reflection. Bibliopolis, Naples: 145–175. Available at http://cepa.info/639

Maturana H. R. (1995) The nature of time. Instituto de Terapia Cognitiva, Santiago. Available at http://cepa.info/638

Maturana H. R. (1996) Biología de lo psíquico. In: Maturana H. R., El Sentido de lo Humano. Dolmen Ediciones, Santiago: 183–198. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. R. (2002) Autopoiesis, structural coupling and cognition: A history of these and other notions in the biology of cognition. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 9(3–4): 5–34. Available at http://cepa.info/685

Maturana H. R. (2003) The biological foundations of self-consciousness and the physical domain of existence. In: Luhmann N., Maturana H., Namiki M., Redder V. & Varela F. (eds.) Beobachter: Konvergenz der Erkenntnistheorien? Second edition. Wilhelm Fink, Munich: 47–117. Available at http://cepa.info/609

Maturana H. R., Lettvin J. Y., McCulloch W. S. & Pitts W. H. (1960) Anatomy and physiology of vision in the frog (Rana pipiens). The Journal of General Physiology 43(6): 129–175. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. R., Mpodozis J. & Letelier J. C. (1995) Brain, language and the origin of human mental functions. Biological Research 28(1): 15–26. Available at http://cepa.info/642

Maturana H. R., Uribe G. & Frenk S. (1968) A biological theory of relativistic colour coding in the primate retina: A discussion of nervous system closure with reference to certain visual effects. Archivos de Biología y Medicina Experimentales Suplemento 1: 1–30. << Google Scholar

Millikan R. G. (1984) Language, thought and other biological categories. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Mitchell R. W. & Hamm M. (1996) The interpretation of animal psychology: Anthropomorphism or behavior reading? Behaviour 134: 173–204. << Google Scholar

Montebello P. (2003) L’autre métaphysique. Les Presses du réel, Paris. << Google Scholar

Moran D. (2000) Introduction to phenomenology. Routledge, London. << Google Scholar

Penfield W. & Boldrey E. (1937) Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain 60(4): 389–443. << Google Scholar

Petit J.-L. (1999) Constitution by movement: Husserl in light of recent neurobiological findings. In: Petitot J., Varela F. J., Pachoud B. & Roy J. M. (eds.) Naturalizing phenomenology: Issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science. Stanford University Press, Stanford: 220–244. << Google Scholar

Proulx J. (2015) Mathematics education research as study. For the Learning of Mathematics 35(3): 25–27. << Google Scholar

Reid D. (1996) Enactivism as a methodology. Proceedings of PME-20, Volume 4. PME, Valencia: 203–210. Available at http://cepa.info/2519

Rizzolatti G. & Sinigaglia C. (2006) So quel che fai. Il cervello che agisce e i neuroni specchio. Raffaello Cortina Editore, Milano. << Google Scholar

Rizzolatti G., Gentilucci M., Fogassi L., Luppino G., Matelli M. & Ponzoni Maggi S. (1987) Neurons related to goal-directed motor acts in inferior area 6 of the macaque monkey. Experimental Brain Research 67: 220–224. << Google Scholar

Salice A. (2015) The phenomenology of the Munich and Göttingen circles. In: Zalta E. N. (ed.) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2015 Edition). << Google Scholar

Sheets-Johnstone M. (1999) The primacy of movement. John Benjamins Press, Amsterdam. << Google Scholar

Simon R. (1985) A frog’s eye view of the world. Structure is destiny: An interview with Humberto Maturana. The Family Therapy Networker 9(3): 32–37; 41–43. << Google Scholar

Smith D. W. (2013) Phenomenology. In: Zalta E. N. (ed.) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2013 Edition). Available at http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/phenomenology

Spiegelberg H. (1994) The phenomenological movement: A historical introduction. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. << Google Scholar

Stewart J., Gapenne O. & Di Paolo E. A. (eds.) (2010) Enaction: Towards a new paradigm for cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Taguchi S. (2006) Das Problem des “Ur-Ich” bei Edmund Husserl. Die Frage nach der selbstverständlichen “Nähe” des Selbst. Springer, Dordrecht. << Google Scholar

Thompson E. (2004) Life and mind: From autopoiesis to neurophenomenology. A tribute to Francisco Varela. Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences 3: 381–398. Available at http://cepa.info/1137

Thompson E. (2007) Mind in life. Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Trnka J. (2016) Hans Jonas on teleology in biology: The relevance of existential philosophy for biological thinking. Límite 10 (34): 41–49. << Google Scholar

Tyler T. (2003) If horses had hands. Society & Animals 11: 267–281. << Google Scholar

Varela F. J. & Poerksen B. (2004) Truth is what works. In: Poerksen B. (ed.) The certainty of uncertainty: Dialogues introducing constructivism. Imprint Academic, Exeter UK: 85–107. Available at http://cepa.info/2515

Varela F. J. (1979) Principles of biological autonomy. Elsevier North Holland, New York. << Google Scholar

Varela F. J. (1984) Living ways of sense-making: A middle path for neuroscience. In: Livingston P. (ed.) Disorder and order. Proceedings of the Stanford International Symposium. Anma Libri, Stanford: 208–224. Available at http://cepa.info/2068

Varela F. J. (1991) Organism: A meshwork of selfless selves. In: Tauber A. (ed.) Organism and the origin of self. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: 79–107. Available at http://cepa.info/1959

Varela F. J. (1992) Autopoiesis and a biology of intentionality. In: McMullin B. (ed.) Proceedings of the workshop “Autopoiesis and perception.” Dublin City University, Dublin: 4–14. Available at http://cepa.info/1274

Varela F. J. (1996) Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of consciousness studies 3(4): 330–349. Available at http://cepa.info/1893

Varela F. J. (1997) Patterns of Life: Intertwining Identity and Cognition. Brain and Cognition 34: 72–87. Available at http://cepa.info/2010

Varela F. J., Letelier J. C., Marín G. & Maturana H. R. (1983) The neurophysiology of avian color vision. Archivos de Biología y Medicina Experimentales 16: 291–303. << Google Scholar

Varela F. J., Thompson E. & Rosch E. (1991) The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Vörös S. & Gaitsch P. (2016) Desire and/or need for life? Towards a phenomenological dialectic of the organism. In: Tønnessen M., Rattasepp & Oma K. A. (eds.) Thinking about animals in the age of the anthropocene. Lexington Books, Lanham: 135–160. << Google Scholar

Villalobos M. & Ward D. (2015) Living systems: Autopoiesis, autonomy and enaction. Philosophy & Technology 28(2): 225–239. Available at http://cepa.info/2511

Villalobos M. (2015) The biological roots of cognition and the social origins of mind: Autopoietic theory, strict naturalism and cybernetics. Ph.D Thesis, University of Edinburgh. << Google Scholar

Vogel L. (1996) The outcry of mute things. Hans Jonas’s imperative of responsibility. In: MacAuley D. (ed.) Minding nature: The philosophers of ecology. Guilford Press, New York: 167–185. << Google Scholar

Weber A. & Varela F. J. (2002) Life after Kant. Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality. Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences 1(2): 97–125. Available at http://cepa.info/2087

Weber A. (2002) The surplus of meaning: Biosemiotic aspects in Francisco J. Varela’s philosophy of cognition. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 9(2): 11–29. Available at http://cepa.info/2470

Weemans M. & Prévost B. (2014) Introduction. In: Melion W. S., Rothstein B. & Weemans M. (eds.) The anthropomorphic lens. Brill, Leiden: 1–18. << Google Scholar

Welton D. (2011) Can a top-down phenomenology of intentional consciousness be integrated with a bottom-up phenomenology of biological systems? Philosophy today 55: 102–113. Available at http://cepa.info/2476

Wynne C. (2004) The perils of anthropomorphism. Nature 428: 606. << Google Scholar

Wynne C. (2007) What are animals? Why anthropomorphism is still not a scientific approach to behavior. Comparative Cognition and Behavior Reviews 2: 125–135. << Google Scholar

Yolton J. W. (1967) Review of “The Phenomenon of Life: Towards a Philosophical Biology” (by Hans Jonas). The Journal of Philosophy 64(8): 254–258. << Google Scholar

Zahavi D. (2007) Phänomenologie für Einsteiger. Wilhelm Fink, Paderborn. << Google Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.