Volume 12 · Number 3 · Pages 292–299

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

Coordination Produces Cognitive Niches, not just Experiences: A Semi-Formal Constructivist Ontology Based on von Foerster

Konrad Werner

Download the full text in
PDF (834 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Context: Von Foerster’s concept of eigenbehavior can be recognized against the broader context of enactivism as it has been advocated by Varela, Thompson and Rosch, by Noë and recently by Hutto and Myin, among others. This flourishing constellation of ideas is on its way to becoming the new paradigm of cognitive science. However, in my reading, enactivism, putting stress on the constitutive role of action when it comes to mind and perception, faces a serious philosophical challenge when attempting to account for the way we actually perceive our environments, most importantly for the fact that we perceive things or objects. Von Foester’s eigenbehavior is understood here as a concept supposed to take on this challenge. Problem: In this article I tackle the following issues: (1) Enactivism must be able to account for the apparent stability of the perceived world: this is not a realm of a never-ending flux of stimuli; it is a realm of stable things. (2) Enactivism is committed to the anti-Cartesian endeavor seeking to bridge the gap between the inner and the outer; between the subjective and the objective. Now, these two points constrain each other so that one cannot address (1) simply by regarding the apparent stability of things as a projection that springs out of the internal machinery binding inputs with outputs. This is because the very idea of such an internal machinery opposes (2), i.e., it employs the Cartesian dichotomy. So, enactivism is in need of an account of (1) that would not oppose its anti-Cartesian commitment. Method: I introduce the ontology of location and niche theory, as it has been brought forth by Varzi, Casati, and Smith, and develop it so that it can be used in the philosophy of mind. This is a conceptual, semi-formal philosophical analysis. Results: I shall come up with the idea of object conceived of a product of action, and - drawing on von Foerster’s central idea - as a product of coordination of perceptions. Yet, it is not coordination of stimuli but coordination of cognitive connections. The notion of connection is thus articulated in the article and cast as the central concept in my proposal. Implications: We are able to account for both (1) and (2. The apparent stability of the perceived world is due to the setting up and maintaining of connections between the perceiver and the things perceived, resulting in the establishment of what I call a cognitive niche. Constructivist content: Constructivism, broadly construed, takes, in my reading, a negative stance in the first place. Namely, it opposes what I call the metaphysics of the ready-made world. So, it holds that there is no ready-made reality; however it remains open when it comes to positive claims: a mind-independent reality does not exist at all or it does exist but it is not ready-made and as such it must be brought to completion, so to speak, or enacted, as Varela et al. would say, by a cognitive subject. In this article, I follow the latter and address one specific issue: how the enacted world gains its relatively stable architecture.

Key words: Enactivism, location, eigenbehavior, niche, cognition, perception, connection.

Citation

Werner K. (2017) Coordination produces cognitive niches, not just experiences: A semi-formal constructivist ontology based on von foerster. Constructivist Foundations 12(3): 292–299. http://constructivist.info/12/3/292

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Fultot M. F., Nie L. & Carello C. (2016) Perception-Action Mutuality Obviates Mental Construction

Matyja J. R. & Schiavio A. (2013) Enactive Music Cognition: Background and Research Themes

Hawes R. (2013) Art & Neurophenomenology: Putting the Experience Before the Words

Staude M. (2008) Meaning and Description in Non-dualism: A Formalization and Extension

Quale A. (2014) Ethics: A Radical-constructivist Approach

References

Betti A. (2016) Kazimierz Twardowski. In: Zalta E. N. (ed.) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2016 Edition). << Google Scholar

Buchanan B. (2008) Onto-ethologies: The animal environments of Uexküll, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, and Deleuze. Suny Press, New York. << Google Scholar

Casati R. & Varzi A. (1999) Parts and places: The structures of spatial representation. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Cocchiarella N. (1996) Conceptual realism as a formal ontology. In: Poli R. & Simons P. (eds.) Formal ontology. Kluwer, Dordrecht: 27–60. << Google Scholar

Cummins F. & De Jesus P. (2016) The loneliness of the enactive cell: Towards a bio-enactive framework. Adaptive Behavior 24(3): 149–159. << Google Scholar

Cummins F. (2014) Voice, (inter-) subjectivity, and real time recurrent interaction. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 760. << Google Scholar

De Jaegher H. & Di Paolo E. (2007) Participatory sense-making. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6(4): 485–507 Available at http://cepa.info/2387

De Jesus P. (2016) From enactive phenomenology to biosemiotic enactivism. Adaptive Behavior 24(2): 130–146 Available at http://cepa.info/2632

De Jesus P. (2016) Making sense of (autopoietic) enactive embodiment: A gentle appraisal. Phainomena 25(98–99): 33–56 Available at http://cepa.info/4133

Di Paolo E., Buhrmann T. & Barandiaran X. (2017) Sensorimotor life: An enactive proposal. Oxford University Press, New York. << Google Scholar

Dupuy J.-P. (2009) On the origins of cognitive science: The mechanization of mind. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Foerster H. von (2003) Objects: Tokens for (eigen-)behaviors. In: Foerster H. von, Understanding understanding: Essays on cybernetics and cognition. Springer, New York: 261–272. Originally published in 1976 Available at http://cepa.info/1270

Foerster H. von (2003) On constructing a reality. In: Foerster H. von, Understanding understanding. Springer, New York: 211–227. Originally published in 1973 Available at http://cepa.info/1278

Froese T. (2010) From cybernetics to second-order cybernetics: A comparative analysis of their central ideas. Constructivist Foundations 5(2): 75–85. http: //cepa.info/148 Available at http://constructivist.info/5/2/075

Froese T. (2011) From second-order cybernetics to enactive cognitive science: Varela’s turn from epistemology to phenomenology. Systems Research and Behavioural Science 28(6): 631–645 Available at http://cepa.info/449

Gasparyan D. (2015) What can the global observer know? Constructivist Foundations 10(2): 227–237 Available at http://constructivist.info/10/2/227

Gibson J. J. (1973) On the concept of “formless invariants” in visual perception. Leonardo 6(1): 43–45. << Google Scholar

Godfrey-Smith P. (1996) Complexity and the function of mind in nature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. << Google Scholar

Godfrey-Smith P. (2016) Other minds: The octopus, the sea, and the deep origins of consciousness. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York. << Google Scholar

Grene M. (1974) The understanding of nature. Reidel, Dordrecht. << Google Scholar

Harrington A. (1996) Reenchanted science: Holism in German culture from Wilhelm II to Hitler. Princeton University Press, Princeton. << Google Scholar

https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/twardowski << Google Scholar

Hutchinson G. E. (1957) Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 22(2): 415–427. << Google Scholar

Hutto D. D. & Myin E. (2013) Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Hutto D. D. & Myin E. (2017) Evolving enactivism: Basic minds meet content. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Hutto D. D. & Myin E. (forthcoming) Going radical. << Google Scholar

Hutto D. D. (2015) REC: Revolution effected by clarification. Topoi, online first. << Google Scholar

Ingarden R. (2013) Controversy over the existence of the world. Volume 1. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main/New York. Polish original published in in 1947. << Google Scholar

Kohn E. (2013) How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. University of California Press, Berkeley CA. << Google Scholar

Latour B. (2013) An inquiry into modes of existence: An anthropology of the moderns Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Law J. (2009) Seeing like a survey. Cultural sociology 3(2): 239–256. << Google Scholar

Law J. (2015) What’s wrong with a one-world world? Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 16(1): 126–139. << Google Scholar

Lettvin J. Y. Maturana H. R., McCulloch W. S. & Pitts W. H. (1968) What the frog’s eye tells the frog’s brain. In: Corning W. C. & Balaban M. (eds.) The mind: Biological approaches to its functions. Wiley, New York: 233–258. Originally published in 1959. << Google Scholar

Lewontin R. (1983) The organism as the subject and object of evolution. Scientia 118: 63–82. << Google Scholar

Lewontin R. (2000) The triple helix. Gene, organism, and environment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Leśniewski S. (1992) Foundations of the general theory of sets I. In: Leśniweski S., Collected works. Kluwer, Dordrecht: 129–173. Originally published in 1916. << Google Scholar

Llored J.-P. & Harré R. (2014) Developing the mereology of chemistry. In: Calosi C. & Graziani P. (eds.) Mereology and the sciences. Springer, Dordrecht: 189–212. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. R. (1978) Cognition. In: Hejl P. M., Köck W. K. & Roth G. (eds.) Wahrnehmung und Kommunikation. Peter Lang, Frankfurt: 29–49 Available at http://cepa.info/550

Merleau-Ponty M. (2002) Phenomenology of perception. Routledge, London. << Google Scholar

Mitterer J. (2001) Die Flucht aus der Beliebigkeit [The flight from contingency]. Fischer, Frankfurt am Main. << Google Scholar

Mol A. (2002) The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Duke University Press, Durham NC. << Google Scholar

Noë A. (2004) Action in perception. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

O’Regan K. & Noë A. (2001) A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(5): 939–973. << Google Scholar

Parzanowski J. (1996) The way of truth. In: Poli R. & Simons P. (eds.) Formal ontology. Kluwer, Dordrecht: 61–130. << Google Scholar

Perzanowski J. (1993) Locative ontology Parts I–III. Logic and Logical Philosophy I: 7–94. << Google Scholar

Perzanowski J. (2004) Toward combination metaphysics. Reports of Mathematical Logic 38: 93–116. << Google Scholar

Perzanowski J. (2012) Towards combination metaphysics. In: Perzanowski J., Art of philosophy: A selection of Jerzy Perzanowski’s Works. Edited by J. Sytnik-Czetwertyński. Ontos Verlag, Frankfurt am Main: 45–68. Originally published in 2004. << Google Scholar

Petitot J. & Smith B. (1996) Physics and the phenomenal world. In: Poli R. & Simons P. (eds.) Formal ontology. Kluwer, Dordrecht: 233–253. << Google Scholar

Piaget J. (1975) L’equilibration des structures cognitives: Problème central du développement. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris. << Google Scholar

Pickering A. (2017) The ontological turn: Taking different worlds seriously. Social Analysis. 62(2); 134–150. << Google Scholar

Pinker S. (2010) The cognitive niche: Coevolution of intelligence, sociality, and language. PNAS 107(11): 8993–8999. << Google Scholar

Plessner H. (1928) Die Stufen des Organischen und der Mensch. Einleitung in die philosophische Anthropologie. De Gruyter, Berlin. << Google Scholar

Putnam H. (1975) The meaning of “meaning.” Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7: 131–193. << Google Scholar

Simons P. M. (1987) Parts: A study in ontology. Clarendon Press, Oxford. << Google Scholar

Smith B. & Varzi A. (1999) The niche. Noûs 33(2): 214–238. << Google Scholar

Smith B. & Varzi A. (2000) Fiat and bona fide boundaries. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60(2): 401–420. << Google Scholar

Smith B. & Varzi A. (2001) Environmental metaphysics. In: Meixner U. (ed.) Metaphysics in the Post-Metaphysical Age. Proceedings of the 22th International Wittgenstein Symposium. Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna: 231–239. << Google Scholar

Smith B. (1996) Mereotopology: A theory of parts and boundaries. Data and Knowledge Engineering 20: 287–303. << Google Scholar

Smith B. (1998) Basic concepts of formal ontology. In: Guarino N. (ed.) Formal ontology in information systems. IOS Press US: 19–28. << Google Scholar

Smith B. (2004) Beyond concepts: Ontology as reality representation. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on formal ontology in information systems (FOIS 2004) IOS Press, Amsterdam: 73–84. << Google Scholar

Sterelny K. (2010) Minds: Extended or scaffolded? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9: 465–481. << Google Scholar

Tønnessen M. (2015) Uexküllian phenomenology. Chinese Semiotic Studies 11(3): 347–369 Available at http://cepa.info/2685

Thomasson A. (2016) Roman Ingarden. In: Zalta E. (ed.) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2016 edition) << Google Scholar

Twardowski K. (1912) O czynnościach i wytworach. Kilka uwag z pogranicza psychologii, gramatyki i logiki. In: Twardowski K., Księga Pamiątkowa ku uczczeniu 250-tej rocznicy założenia Uniwersytetu Lwowskiego przez króla Jana Kazimierza. Volume II. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Lwowskiego, Lviv: 1–33. English translation: Twardowski K. (1999) On actions, products and other topics in philosophy. Edited by J. Brandl and J. Wolenski. Rodopi, Amsterdam: 103–132. << Google Scholar

Uexküll J. von (1909) Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Springer, Berlin Available at http://cepa.info/2404

Uexküll J. von (1920) Theoretische Biologie. Paetel, Berlin. English translation: Uexküll J. (1926) Theoretical biology. Harcourt, Brace & Co., New York. << Google Scholar

Uexküll J. von (1926) Theoretical biology. Harcourt, Brace & Co, New York. << Google Scholar

Uexküll J. von (1934) Streifzüge durch die Umwelten von Tieren und Menschen. Springer, Berlin. English translation: Uexküll J. von (1957) A stroll through the worlds of animals and men. In: Schiller C. H. (ed.) Instinctive behavior: The development of a modern concept. International Universities Press, New York: 5–80 Available at http://cepa.info/2403

van Duijn M., Keijzer K. & Franken D. (2006) Principles of minimal cognition: Casting cognition as sensorimotor coordination. Adaptive Behavior 14(2): 157–170. << Google Scholar

Varela F. J. (1991) Organism: A meshwork of selfless selves. In: Tauber A. I. (ed.) Organism and the origins of Self. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: 79–107 Available at http://cepa.info/1959

Varela F. J. (1996) Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies 3: 330–335 Available at http://cepa.info/1893

Varela F. J. (1997) Patterns of life: Intertwining identity and cognition. Brain and Cognition 34: 72–87 Available at http://cepa.info/2010

Varela F. J., Thompson E. & Rosch E. (1991) The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Varzi A. (2016) Mereology. In: Zalta E. N. (ed.) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition) << Google Scholar

Vörös S., Froese T. & Riegler A. (2016) Epistemological odyssey. Constructivist Foundations 11(2): 189–204 Available at http://constructivist.info/11/2/189

Weber A. & Varela F. J. (2002) Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality. Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences 1: 97–125 Available at http://cepa.info/2087

Werner K. (2015) Towards a PL-metaphysics of perception. Constructivist Foundations 11(1): 148–157 Available at http://constructivist.info/11/1/148

Werner K. (2016) What is it like to be a metaphysical subject: An essay on early Wittgenstein, our epistemic position and beyond. Philosophia 44(3): 921–946. << Google Scholar

Werner K. (2017) Metaphilosophy of mind: How do minds investigate minds? Refutation of the theocentric view. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 51(1): 120–140. << Google Scholar

Wittgenstein L. (1922) Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Kegan Paul, London. << Google Scholar

Woleński J. (1989) Logic and philosophy in the Lvov-Warsaw School. Kluwer, Dordrecht. << Google Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.