Volume 12 · Number 3 · Pages 316–325

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

Audience and Eigenform: Cybersemiotic Epistemology and the “Truth of the Human Spirit” in Performance

Tom Scholte

Download the full text in
PDF (684 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Context: Despite the best efforts of postmodern, social constructivist scholars to discredit the notion that “realistic” works of theatre and film could contain genuine onto-epistemic goods, many lay observers (i.e., audiences) continue to describe individual performances and productions as more or less “truthful” than one another. Recently, some performance scholars have pushed back against the postmodern position and turned to contemporary cognitive science to undergird their insistence that the embodied nature of reception and perception does, in fact, allow audiences of such works to access “truths” within them. The literature of cybernetics (first- or second-order) has been almost entirely absent from the debate. Problem: While the hardcore scepticism of social constructivism may be unsatisfactory in fully accounting for the enduring power and appeal of dramatic art, a retreat to epistemic certainty in the name of cognitive science would be equally unwise. This article proposes the notion of “eigenbehavior” as a conceptual bridge that might facilitate the synthesis of the most useful insights from both perspectives and open up new avenues of study and research. Method: The article uses synthetic argumentation to propose a theory of eigenform within the context of theatrical performance. Results: Emerging from this argumentation is a conception of eigenform that is novel in its emphasis on the distinction between its bio-structured and socio-structured features. Implications: The insights in this article will be of value to scholars and practitioners of the dramatic arts and can be productively extended into cognate domains across the humanities. Constructivist content: The article draws on the works of constructivists such as von Glasersfeld, von Foerster, Maturana, Varela, and Luhmann and is grounded in such constructivist perspectives as cybersemiotics, theory of autopoiesis, and systems theory. Key Words: Social systems, semiotics, language, acting, culture, ethics.

Citation

Scholte T. (2017) Audience and eigenform: Cybersemiotic epistemology and the “truth of the human spirit” in performance. Constructivist Foundations 12(3): 316–325. http://constructivist.info/12/3/316

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

References

Ashby W. R. (1964) An introduction to cybernetics. Methuen, London. << Google Scholar

Auslander P. (1998) From acting to performance: Essays in modernism and postmodernism. Routledge, New York. << Google Scholar

Bateson G. (1979) Mind and nature: A necessary unity. E. P. Dutton, New York. << Google Scholar

Beer S. (1979) The heart of enterprise. Wiley, Chichester. << Google Scholar

Benedetti J. (1998) Stanislavski and the actor. Routledge, New York NY. << Google Scholar

Blair R. (2000) The method and the computational theory of mind. In: Krasner D. (ed.) Method acting reconsidered. St. Martin’s Press, New York. << Google Scholar

Boal A. (1985) Theatre of the oppressed. Translated by Charles A. McBride, Maria-Odilia Leal McBride and Emily Fryer. Theatre Communications Group, New York NY. Spanish original published in 1974. << Google Scholar

Boulding K. E. (1956) The image: Knowledge in life and society. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor MI. << Google Scholar

Brün H. (2003) Irresistible observations. Non Sequitur Press, Champaign IL. << Google Scholar

Brecht B. (1974) Brecht on theatre: The development of an aesthetic. Eyre Methuen, London. << Google Scholar

Brier S. (2008) Cybersemiotics: Why information is not enough. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. << Google Scholar

Bunnell P. (2008) Editorial foreword. In: Maturana H. R. & Verden-Zöller’s G., The origin of humanness in the biology of love. Imprint Academic, Exeter: V-xxi. << Google Scholar

Bunnell P. (2015) Dancing with ambiguity. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 22(4): 101–112 Available at http://cepa.info/3487

Campbell D. T. (1974) “Downward causation” in hierarchically organised biological systems. In: Ayala F. J. & Dobzhansky T. (eds.) Studies in the philosophy of biology: Reduction and related problems. Macmillan, London: 179–186. << Google Scholar

Case S.-E. (1983) Classic drag: The Greek creation of female parts. Theatre Journal 37(3): 317–327. << Google Scholar

Case S.-E. (ed.) (1996) Split britches, Routledge, New York. << Google Scholar

Cavaliere A. (2017) Stanislavsky in Brazil: Territories and frontiers. In: Pitches J. & Aquilina S. (eds.) Stanislavsky in the world: The system and its transformations across continent. Bloomsbury, London: 213–237. << Google Scholar

Clarke B. & Chansky D. (2016) Audience and autopoiesis. Constructivist Foundations 11(3): 610–612 Available at http://constructivist.info/11/3/610

Clarke B. (2009) Heinz von Foerster’s demons: The emergence of second-order systems theory. In: Clarke B. & Hansen M. B. N. (eds.) Emergence and embodiment: New Essays on second-order systems theory. Duke University, Durham: 35–61. << Google Scholar

Counsell C. (1996) Signs of performance: An introduction to twentieth century theatre. Routledge, New York. << Google Scholar

Diamond E. (1989) Mimesis, mimicry, and the “true-real.” Modern Drama 32(1): 58–72. << Google Scholar

Diderot D. (2015) Paradoxe sur le comédien. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, North Charleston SC. Written between 1772 and 1777; first published in 1830. << Google Scholar

Dilts R., Epstein T. & Dilts R. W. (1991) Tools for dreamers: Strategies of creativity and the structure of innovation. Meta Publications, Capitola CA. << Google Scholar

Dolan J. (1991) The feminist spectator as critic. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. << Google Scholar

Elam K. (1988) The semiotics of theatre and drama. Routledge, London. << Google Scholar

Espejo R. & Dominici G. (2017) Cybernetics of value cocreation for product development. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 34(1): 24–40 Available at http://cepa.info/4131

Espejo R. (2015) Performance for viability: Complexity and variety management. Kybernetes 44(6/7): 1020–1029. << Google Scholar

Flemons D. G. (1991) Completing distinctions: Interweaving the ideas of Gregory Bateson and Taoism into a unique approach to therapy. Shambhala, Boston. << Google Scholar

Foerster H. von (1981) Objects: Tokens for (eigen-) behaviors. In: Foerster H. von, Observing Systems. Intersystems Publications, Salinas CA: 274–285. Originally published in 1976 Available at http://cepa.info/1270

Foerster H. von (1981) Observing systems. Intersystems Publications, Salinas CA. << Google Scholar

Foerster H. von (2003) Objects: Tokens for (eigen-) behaviors. In. Foerster H. von, Understanding understanding: Essays in cybernetics and cognition. Springer, New York: 261–271. Originally published in 1976 Available at http://cepa.info/1270

García de la Cerda O. & Saavedra Ulloa M. S. (2006) Self management: An innovative tool for enactive human design. In: Adam F., Brézillon P., Carlsson S. & Humphreys P. (eds.) Creativity and innovation in decision making and decision support. Volume 1. Decision Support Press, London: 195–214. << Google Scholar

García de la Cerda O. (2009) Human re-engineering for action: An enactive educational management program. Kybernetes 38(7/8): 1332–1334. << Google Scholar

Glanville R. (2012) Inside every white box are two black boxes trying to get out. In: Glanville R., The black boox. Volume I: Cybernetic circles. Edition Echoraum, Vienna: 439–453. Originally published in 1982 Available at http://cepa.info/2365

Glasersfeld E. von (1980) The concept of equilibration in a constructivist theory of knowledge. In: Benseler F., Hejl P. M. & Köck W. K. (eds.) Autopoiesis, communication, and society. Campus, Franfurt: 75–85 Available at http://cepa.info/1352

Glasersfeld E. von (1995) Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Falmer Press, London Available at http://cepa.info/1462

Hagen U. & Frankell H. (1973) Respect for acting. Wiley, New York. << Google Scholar

Hauskeller M., Philbeck T. D. & Carbonell C. D. (2015) The Palgrave handbook of posthumanism in film and television. Palgrave McMillan, London. << Google Scholar

Herbrechter S. (2010) Posthumanism: A critical analysis. Bloomsbury, London. << Google Scholar

Huxley A. (1954) The doors of perception. Harper & Brothers, New York. << Google Scholar

Kauffman L. H. (2005) EigenForm. Kybernetes 34(1/2): 129–150 Available at http://cepa.info/1271

Kauffman L. H. (2009) Reflexivity and eigenform: The shape of process. Constructivist Foundations 4(3): 121–137 Available at http://constructivist.info/4/3/121

Kauffman L. H. (2015) Self-reference, biologic and the structure of reproduction. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 119(3): 382–409 Available at http://cepa.info/2844

Kauffman L. H. (2016) Cybernetics, reflexivity, and second-order science. Constructivist Foundations 11(3): 489–495 Available at http://constructivist.info/11/3/489

Kleist H. von (1972) On the marionette theatre. The Drama Review 16(3): 22–26. German original published in 1810. << Google Scholar

Knowles R. (2014) How theatre means. Palgrave Macmillan, London. << Google Scholar

Krippendorff K. (2009) A constructivist critique of semiotics. In: Krippendorff K., On communicating: Otherness, meaning and information. Edited by F. Bermejo. Routledge, New York: 173–190 Available at http://cepa.info/4159

Landgraf E. (2016) Naturalism in improvisation and embodiment. Constructivist Foundations 11(3): 613–615 Available at http://constructivist.info/11/3/613

Lettvin J. Y., Maturana H. R., McCulloch W. S. & Pitts W. H. (1959) What the frog’s eye tells the frog’s brain. Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers (IRE) 47(11): 1940–1951 Available at http://cepa.info/518

Lettvin J. Y., Maturana H. R., McCulloch W. S. & Pitts W. H. (1968) What the frog’s eye tells the frog’s brain. In: Corning W. C. & Balaban M. (eds.) “The mind: Biological approaches to its functions” Interscience Publishers, New York: 233–258. Originally published in 1959. << Google Scholar

Liu S. (2017) Towards a Chinese school of performance and directing: Jiao Juyin. In: Pitches J. & Aquilina S. (eds.) Stanislavsky in the world: The system and its transformations across continent. Bloomsbury, London: 149–165. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1995) Social systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford. German original published in 1984. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (2000) Art as a social system. Stanford University Press, Stanford. German original published in 1995. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (2003) Introduction to systems theory. Stanford University Press, Stanford. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (2008) Law as a social system. Oxford University Press, New York. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (2013) A systems theory of religion. Stanford University Press, Stanford. << Google Scholar

Maruyama M. (1963) The second cybernetics: Deviation-amplifying mutual causal processes. American Scientist 5(2): 164–179 Available at http://cepa.info/4092

Maturana H. R. & Verden-Zöller G. (2008) The origins of humanness in the biology of love. Imprint Academic, Exeter. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. R. (1978) Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In: Miller G. & Lenneberg E. (eds.) Psychology and biology of language and thought: Essays in honor of Eric Lenneberg. Academic Press, New York: 27–63 Available at http://cepa.info/549

Maturana H. R. (2005) The origin and conservation of self-consciousness: Reflections on four questions by Heinz von Foerster. Kybernetes 34(1/2) 54–88 Available at http://cepa.info/702

Mulvey L. (1975) Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen 16(3): 6–18. << Google Scholar

Nagel T. (1974) What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review LXXXIII 4(435–50) << Google Scholar

Nayar P. K. (2014) Posthumanism. Polity, Malden MA. << Google Scholar

Rajan T. (2001) In the wake of cultural studies: Globalization, theory, and the university. Diacritics 31(3): 67–88. << Google Scholar

Richards L. D. (2013) Difference-making from a cybernetic perspective: The role of listening and its circularities. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 20(1/2): 59–68. << Google Scholar

Roach J. (1993) The player’s passion: Studies in the science of acting. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. << Google Scholar

Rocha L. M. (1996) Eigenbehavior and symbols. Systems Research 13(3): 371–384 Available at http://cepa.info/1275

Rokotnitz N. (2011) Trusting performance: A cognitive approach to embodiment in drama. Palgrave and Macmillan, London. << Google Scholar

Scholte T. (2015) Proto-cybernetics in the Stanislavski System of Acting: Past foundations, present analyses and future prospects. Kybernetes 44(8–9): 1371–1379. << Google Scholar

Scholte T. (2016) “Black box” theatre: Second-order cybernetics and naturalism in rehearsal and performance. Constructivist Foundations 11(3): 598–608 Available at http://constructivist.info/11/3/598

Sharon T. (2014) Human nature in an age of biotechnology: The case for mediated posthumanism. Springer, Dordrecht. << Google Scholar

Stanislavski C. (1968) Stanislavski’s legacy. Translated by E. Hapgood. Methuen, London. << Google Scholar

Tian M. (2008) The poetics of difference and displacement. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong. << Google Scholar

Uexküll J. von (1992) A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: A picture book of invisible worlds. Semiotica 89(4): 319–391. German original published in 1934 Available at http://cepa.info/2403

Ulrich W. (1996) Critical systems thinking for citizens. In: Flood R. L. & Romm N. R. A. (eds.) Critical systems thinking. Springer, New York: 165–178. << Google Scholar

Wolfe C. (2009) Human, all too human: “Animal studies” and the humanities. PMLA 124(2): 564–575. << Google Scholar

Wolfe C. (2010) What is posthumanism? University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. << Google Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.