Volume 13 · Number 1 · Pages 169–171

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

“Posing | Solving” Can Be Explained Without Representations, Because It Is a Form of Perception-Action

Matthew Isaac Harvey

Download the full text in
PDF (93 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment


Open peer commentary on the article “From Problem Solving to Problem Posing, and from Strategies to Laying Down a Path in Solving: Taking Varela’s Ideas to Mathematics Education Research” by Jérôme Proulx & Jean-François Maheux. Upshot: The target article succeeds in conceptualizing mathematical problem-solving as a form of organism-environment coupling. So conceived, it is a suitable subject for both enactive and ecological descriptions, and is open to embodied, dynamical explanations that have no need for cognitivist models. In other words, Proulx and Maheux have shown how to get across the “cognitive gap.”


Harvey M. I. (2017) “posing | solving” can be explained without representations, because it is a form of perception-action. Constructivist Foundations 13(1): 169–171. http://constructivist.info/13/1/169

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.