Volume 2 · Number 1 · Pages 6–16

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

Radical Constructivism Seen with Edmund Husserl as Starting Point

Edmond Mutelesi

Download the full text in
PDF (127 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment


Purpose: The paper intends to investigate possible affinities between Husserlian phenomenology, mainly on the basis of Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität, and radical constructivism, essentially in its version according to Maturana and Varela. Findings: Although the two thoughts appear to be delivered in terms that can be philosophically quite abstract for the Husserlian phenomenology and that are empirical-concrete for radical constructivism in Maturana’s thought, there is actually an obvious closeness between the two theories of knowledge, so that the epistemological approach used on both sides can be said to be idealistic. This idealistic orientation in epistemology certainly has its basis in the links seen on both sides between the organic and the cognitive dimension of the subject, although those links are taken as a theme in a kinesthetic approach by Husserl and in a bio-physiological one by Maturana. Neurophenomenology is nowadays one of the fields where this organic–cognitive link – which is crucial for an idealistic approach to knowledge – is being expressed. Research implications: Talking about idealism should not be a source of fear, especially when what is meant is an epistemological idealism and when it is clearly and simply understood as the philosophical and epistemological orientation that interprets the subject as determining the way the object is known in the cognitive process. Also idealism does not mean necessarily subjective idealism. Some very “balanced” authors developed a theory of knowledge that is usually seen as idealistic without ignoring the role played by the object in the cognitive process. It is therefore worth investigating further the fact that the ultimate meaning of idealistic epistemologies acknowledging intersubjectivity as a defining dimension of knowledge, is not to ignore the object but to rigorously reestablish the genesis of the object in the cognitive process.

Key words: knowledge, cognition, constitution, construction, intersubjectivity, idealism


Mutelesi E. (2006) Radical constructivism seen with edmund husserl as starting point. Constructivist Foundations 2(1): 6–16. http://constructivist.info/2/1/006

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Quale A. (2015) Religion: A Radical-Constructivist Perspective

Quale A. (2014) Ethics: A Radical-constructivist Approach

Quale A. (2012) On the Role of Constructivism in Mathematical Epistemology

Verbeke J. (2015) Designing Academic Conferences as a Learning Environment: How to Stimulate Active Learning at Academic Conferences?

Peschl M. F. (2006) Modes of Knowing and Modes of Coming to Know Knowledge Creation and Co-Construction as Socio-Epistemological Engineering in Educational Processes


Bateson G. (1987) Geist und Natur: Eine notwendige Einheit. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main. English original: Bateson G. (1979) Mind and nature: A necessary unity. Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ. << Google Scholar

Hejl P. M. (1987) Konstruktion der sozialen Konstruktion: Grundlinien einer konstruktivistischen Sozialtheorie. In: Schmidt S. J. (ed.) Der Diskurs des Radikalen Konstruktivismus. Suhrkamp: Franfurt/Main: 303–339. << Google Scholar

Husserl E. (1931) Méditations cartésiennes. Introduction à la phénoménologie, édition française. Librairie Armand Colin, Paris. German original published in 1929. << Google Scholar

Husserl E. (1970) L’idée de la phénoménologie (translated by A. Lowit). P. U. F., Paris. German original published in 1907. << Google Scholar

Husserl E. (1972) Philosophie première. T.2. Théorie de la réduction phénoménologique. P. U. F., Paris. German original published in 1923–1924. << Google Scholar

Husserl E. (1973) Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Part 3. Edited by I. Kern (Husserliana XV). Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague. << Google Scholar

Kurt R. (1995) Subjektivität und Intersubjektivität. Kritik der konstruktivistischen Vernunft. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt/Main, New York. << Google Scholar

Ladrière J. (1997) L'éthique dans l'univers de la rationalité. Artel-Fides: Namur. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. & Varela F. (1987) Der Baum der Erkenntnis: Die biologischen Wurzeln des menschlichen Erkennens. Scherz Verlag: Bern, Wien. English original published as: Maturana H. & Varela F. (1987) The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. New Science Library, Boston. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. (1974) Stratégies cognitives. In: Morin E. & Piatelli-Palmarini M. (eds.) L’unité de l’homme. T.2. Le cerveau humain. Editions du Seuil, Paris: 418–442. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. (1985) Erkennen: The Organisation und Verkörperung von Wirklichkeit. Ausgewählte Arbeiten zur biologischen Epistemologie (2nd edition). Vieweg, Braunschweig. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. (1987) Kognition. In: Schmidt S. J. (ed.) Der Diskurs des Radikalen Konstruktivismus. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main: 89–118. English original published in 1978. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. (1990) The biological foundations of self consciousness and the physical domain of existence. In: Luhmann N., Maturana H., Namiki M., Redder V. & Varela F. (eds.) Beobachter: Konvergenz der Erkenntnistheorien? Fink Verlag, Munich. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. (1994) Was ist Erkennen? Piper Verlag, Munich. << Google Scholar

Mutelesi E. M. (1998) Subjectivité comme auto-organisation: Une étude du constructivisme radical au départ du Husserl de “Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität”. Dissertation at the university of Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/pub/mutelesi/

Neisser U. (1979) Kognition und Wirklichkeit: Prinzipien und Implikationen der kognitiven Psychologie. Klett-Cotta: Stuttgart. English original: Neisser U. (1976) Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco. << Google Scholar

Römpp G. (1992) Husserls Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität und ihre Bedeutung für eine Theorie intersubjektiver Objektivität und die Konzeption einer phänomenologischen Philosophie. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, Boston, London. << Google Scholar

Ricoeur P. (1986) A l’école de la phenomenologie. Vrin, Paris. << Google Scholar

Riegas V. & Vetter C. (eds.) (1990) Zur Biologie der Kognition: Ein Gespräch mit Humberto Maturana und Beiträge zur Diskussion seines Werkes. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main. << Google Scholar

Roth G. (1987) Autopoiese und Kognition. Die Theorie H. R. Maturanas und die Notwendigkeit ihrer Weiterentwicklung. In: Schmidt S. J. (ed.) Der Diskurs des Radikalen Konstruktivismus. Suhrkamp: Franfurt/Main: 256–286. << Google Scholar

Sandkühler H. J. (ed.) (1990) Europäische Enzyklopädie zu Philosophie und Wissenschaften. Band 4. Felix Meiner Verlag, Hamburg. << Google Scholar

Thompson E., Lutz A. & Cosmelli D. (2005) Neurophenomenology: An introduction for neurophilosophers. In: Brook A. & Akins K. (eds) Cognition and the brain: The philosophy and neuroscience movement. Cambridge University Press, New York, Cambridge. Read in Manuscript stage. << Google Scholar

Tietjen H. (1980) Fichte und Husserl: Letztbegründung, Subjektivität und praktische Vernunft im transzendentalen Idealismus. Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt/Main. << Google Scholar

Varela F. (1989) Autonomie et connaissance: Essai sur le vivant (transl. by P. Bourgine et P. Dumouchel). Editions du Seuil, Paris. English original published as: Varela F. (1979) Principles of biological autonomy. Elsevier/North-Holland, New York. << Google Scholar

Zahavi D. (1994) Husserl’s phenomenology of the body. Etudes Phenomenologiques 19: 63–84. << Google Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.