Volume 3 · Number 1 · Pages 1–6 & 16–18

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

Arguments Opposing the Radicalism of Radical Constructivism

Gernot Saalmann

Download the full text in
PDF (292 kB)

Abstract

Purpose: Examination of the main arguments for radical constructivism and the critical arguments put forward against it. Findings: Although there is no reason to doubt the value of constructivism as such, it can be stated that any epistemological radicalism lacks plausibility. There is ample evidence that we still can adopt a critical realist outlook, even if every part of our world view is a construction. Implications: We should engage ourselves in the development of an anti-metaphysical, non-objectivist epistemology. By far the most promising contribution should be a version of pragmatism.

Key words: cognitive constructivism, critical realism, epistemology, pragmatism, reality, viability, radical constructivism

Citation

Saalmann G. (2007) Arguments Opposing the Radicalism of Radical Constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 3(1): 1–6 & 16–18. Available at http://constructivist.info/3/1/001.saalmann

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Müller K. H. (2011) The Two Epistemologies of Ernst von Glasersfeld

Bednarz N. & Proulx J. (2011) Ernst von Glasersfeld’s Contribution and Legacy to a Didactique des Mathématiques Research Community

Scholl A. (2012) Between Realism and Constructivism? Luhmann’s Ambivalent Epistemological Standpoint

Scholl A. (2012) Author’s Response: What Constructivism Does not Say

Kenny V. (2011) Continuous Dialogues. Ernst von Glasersfeld’s Answers to a Wide Variety of Questioners on the Oikos Web Site 1997–2010