Volume 3 · Number 3 · Pages 148–152

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

Action and Discourse. Some Thoughts Concerning a Non-dualizing Conception of Experience

Franz Ofner

Download the full text in
PDF (96 kB)

Abstract

Purpose: The paper aims at examining whether George Herbert Mead’s theory of language is an appropriate candidate for developing a non-dualistic conception of experience and empirical research. Problem: Josef Mitterer has limited his theory of a non-dualizing way of speaking to criticizing dualistic positions in philosophy and sciences but has not developed a non-dualistic conception of empirical research. To do this, the task is to forego the notion “description” as a remainder category of dualism to develop a new understanding of language. Findings: Mead’s communication and action theory contains a non-dualistic nucleus. His gesture theory of communication allows us to distinguish action and speech and connect them in a non-dualizing way. Further research should especially focus on the relation between immediate and reflective experience in Mead’s work.

Key words: non-dualism, communication theory, experience theory

Citation

Ofner F. (2008) Action and Discourse. Some Thoughts Concerning a Non-dualizing Conception of Experience. Constructivist Foundations 3(3): 148–152. Available at http://constructivist.info/3/3/148.ofner

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Ofner F. (2013) Some Ideas towards a Non-dualism-Compatible Theory of Science

Vörös S. (2014) The Uroboros of Consciousness: Between the Naturalisation of Phenomenology and the Phenomenologisation of Nature

Weiss M. G. (2013) Non-dualistic Sex. Josef Mitterer’s Non-dualistic Philosophy in the Light of Judith Butler’s (De)Constructivist Feminism

Riegler A. & Weber S. (2013) Non-dualism: A New Understanding of Language

Ene P. (2013) Descriptions as Distinctions. George Spencer Brown’s Calculus of Indications as a Basis for Mitterer’s Non-dualistic Descriptions