Volume 3 · Number 3 · Pages 181–191

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

Non-dualistic? Radical Constructivist?

Karl H. Müller

Download the full text in
PDF (151 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Purpose: Josef Mitterer’s essays are considered to be important philosophical advancements of radical constructivism. The main purposes of this paper are, on the one hand, to structure the RC landscape and, on the other hand, to investigate the relations of Mitterer’s work to radical constructivism in particular and to philosophy in general. Findings: In this short essay focusing on Mitterer’s Das Jenseits der Philosophie, I would like to stress two major points. First, Mitterer’s book should be considered as one of several contemporary variants of a radical critique of the semantic turn in the philosophy of science that has taken place since the mid-thirties with the works of Rudolf Carnap, Carl G. Hempel, Hilary Putnam, Alfred Tarski and others. Second, it is by no means clear how to determine the relevance of the new semantic critique for the present and future cognitive status of radical constructivism. The degree of relevance depends crucially on the use of the term “radical constructivism.” If radical constructivism, as I will argue, is seen as an umbrella term for a group of empirical research programs, then, by sheer necessity, the relevance can be marginal only. If, however, radical constructivism is viewed as a special form of philosophy of language and/or as a new epistemology, then the importance of Josef Mitterer’s approach must be judged within the context of available functional alternatives. Implications: An immediate consequence of this article lies in a renewed emphasis on advancing an empirical research agenda for radical constructivism and in an effective downsizing of radical constructivism as a philosophical perspective.

Key words: cognitive maps, research programs, varieties of constructivism, varieties of dualism/non-dualism

Citation

Müller K. H. (2008) Non-dualistic? Radical constructivist? Constructivist Foundations 3(3): 181–191. http://constructivist.info/3/3/181

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Müller K. H. (2010) The Radical Constructivist Movement and Its Network Formations

Müller K. H. (2008) Methodologizing Radical Constructivism. Recipes for RC-Designs in the Social Sciences

Müller K. H. (2011) The Two Epistemologies of Ernst von Glasersfeld

Müller K. H. (2008) The Missing Links of Radical Constructivism

Müller K. H. & Riegler A. (2014) Second-Order Science: A Vast and Largely Unexplored Science Frontier

References

Balzer W., Moulines C. U. & Sneed J. D. (1987) An architectonic for science. The structuralist program. Reidel, Dordrecht. << Google Scholar

Bauman Z. (2000) Liquid modernity. Polity Press, Cambridge. << Google Scholar

Beer S. (1994) Beyond dispute. The invention of team syntegrity. John Wiley, Chichester. << Google Scholar

Beer S. (1994) Brain of the firm. Second edition. John Wiley, Chichester. << Google Scholar

Beer S. (1994) Decision and control. The meaning of operational research and management cybernetics. John Wiley, Chichester. << Google Scholar

Beer S. (1994) Designing freedom. John Wiley, Chichester. << Google Scholar

Beer S. (1994) Heart of enterprise. Second edition. John Wiley, Chichester. << Google Scholar

Beer S. (1994) How many grapes went into the wine. Stafford Beer on the art and science of holistic management. Edited by Roger Harnden and Alenna Leonard. John Wiley, Chichester. << Google Scholar

Brandom R. B. (1994) Making it explicit. Reasoning, representing and discursive commitment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. << Google Scholar

Brandom R. B. (2000) Expressive Vernunft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. Originally publication: Brandom R. B. (1994) Making it explicit. Reasoning, representing, and. discursive commitment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Brandom R. B. (2004) Begründen und Begreifen. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. << Google Scholar

Brandom R. B. (2008) Between saying and doing. Towards an analytic pragmatism. Oxford University Press, Oxford. << Google Scholar

Brandom R. B. (2008) The John Locke lectures 2005–2006, Lecture 1. Retrieved from http://www.pitt.edu/~brandom/locke/downloads/LL1%20EPA%2007–510%20a.doc on 18 March 2008. << Google Scholar

Bunge M. (1977) Treatise on basic philosophy. Ontology I: The furniture of the world. Reidel, Dordrecht. << Google Scholar

Bunge M. (1979) Treatise on basic philosophy. Ontology II: A world of systems. Reidel, Dordrecht. << Google Scholar

Bunge M. (1983) Treatise on basic philosophy. Epistemology and methodology I: Exploring the world. Reidel, Dordrecht. << Google Scholar

Bunge M. (1983) Treatise on basic philosophy. Epistemology and methodology II: Understanding the world. Reidel, Dordrecht. << Google Scholar

Donovan A., Laudan L. & Laudan R. (eds.) (1988) Scrutinizing science. Empirical studies of scientific change. Kluwer, Dordrecht. << Google Scholar

Foerster H. von & Glasersfeld E. von (1999) Wie wir uns erfinden. Eine Autobiographie des radikalen Konstruktivismus. Carl Auer, Heidelberg. << Google Scholar

Foerster H. von & Müller K. H. (2003) Action without utility. An immodest proposal for the cognitive foundations of behavior. Cybernetics and Human Knowing (3–4): 27–50. << Google Scholar

Foerster H. von (1981) Das Konstruieren einer Wirklichkeit. In: Watzlawick P. (ed.) Die erfundene Wirklichkeit. Wie wissen wir, was wir zu wissen glauben? Beiträge zum Konstruktivismus. Piper, Munich: 39–60. << Google Scholar

Foerster H. von (1985) Sicht und Einsicht. Versuche zu einer operativen Erkenntnistheorie. Vieweg, Braunschweig. << Google Scholar

Foerster H. von (1988) Abbau und Aufbau. In: Simon F. B. (ed.) Lebende Systeme. Wirklichkeitskonstruktionen in der Systemischen Therapie. Springer, Berlin: 19–33. << Google Scholar

Foerster H. von (2001) Rückschauen und Vorschauen. Heinz von Foerster im Gespräch mit Albert Müller und Karl H. Müller. In: Müller A., Müller K. H. & Stadler F. (eds.) Konstruktivismus und Kognitionswissenschaft. Kulturelle Wurzeln und Ergebnisse. Heinz von Foerster gewidmet. Second enlarged edition. Springer, Vienna: 229–242. << Google Scholar

Foerster H. von (2003) Understanding understanding. Essays on cybernetics and cognition. Springer, New York. << Google Scholar

Glanville R. & Müller K. H. (ed.) (2007) Gordon Pask, philosopher mechanic. An introduction to the cybernetician’s cybernetician. Edition echoraum, Vienna. << Google Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (1974) Piaget and the radical constructivist epistemology. In: Smock C. D. & Glasersfeld E. von (eds.) Epistemology and education. Follow Through Publications, Athens: 1–24. Available at http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/034

Glasersfeld E. von (1981) Einführung in den radikalen Konstruktivismus. In: Watzlawick P. (ed.) Die erfundene Wirklichkeit. Wie wissen wir, was wir zu wissen glauben? Beiträge zum Konstruktivismus. Piper, Munich: 16–38. Available at http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/070.1

Glasersfeld E. von (1987) Wissen, Sprache und Wirklichkeit. Arbeiten zum radikalen Konstruktivismus. Vieweg, Braunschweig. << Google Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (1997) Radikaler Konstruktivismus. Ideen, Ergebnisse, Probleme. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. << Google Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (1997) Wie ich zum Konstruktivisten heranwuchs. Sprachen und geistreiche Menschen. In: Glasersfeld E. von, Radikaler Konstruktivismus. Ideen, Ergebnisse, Probleme. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main: 22–55. << Google Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (2007) Key works in radical constructivism. Edited by Marie Larochelle. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam. << Google Scholar

Holenstein E. (2004) Philosophie-Atlas. Orte und Wege des Denkens. Ammann, Zurich. << Google Scholar

Hollingsworth J. R. & Hollingsworth E. J. (2000) Radikale Innovationen und Forschungsorganisation. Eine Annäherung. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften 1: 31–66. << Google Scholar

Ludwig G. (1990) Die Grundstrukturen einer physikalischen Theorie. Second Edition. Springer, Berlin. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1984) Soziale Systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. << Google Scholar

Lyotard J. F. (1984) The postmodern condition. A report on knowledge. Manchester University Press, Manchester. << Google Scholar

Mareschal D., Johnson M. H., Sirois S., Spratling S., Spratling M., Thomas M. S. C. & Westermann G. (2007) Neuroconstructivism. Oxford University Press, Oxford. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. R. (1985) Erkennen: Die Organisation und Verkörperung von Wirklichkeit. Second edition. Vieweg, Braunschweig. << Google Scholar

Maturana. H. R. & Varela F. J. (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition. The realization of the living. Reidel, Dordrecht. << Google Scholar

Maturana. H. R. & Varela F. J. (1987) Der Baum der Erkenntnis. Die biologischen Grundlagen der Erkenntnis. Scherz, Bern. << Google Scholar

Müller A. & Müller K. H. (eds.) (2007) An unfinished revolution? Heinz von Foerster and the Biological Computer Laboratoty | BCL, 1958–1976. Edition echoraum, Vienna. << Google Scholar

Müller K. H. (1998) Sozioökonomische Modelle und gesellschaftliche Komplexität.Vermittlung und Designs. Metropolis, Marburg. << Google Scholar

Müller K. H. (2007) The BCL. An unfinished revolution of an unfinished revolution. In: Müller A. & Müller K. H. (eds.) An unfinished revolution? Heinz von Foerster and the Biological Computer Laboratoty | BCL, 1958–1976. Edition echoraum, Vienna: 407–466. << Google Scholar

Müller K. H. (2007) What is radical about radical constructivism? In: Glanville R. & Riegler A. (eds.) The importance of being Ernst. Festschrift for Ernst von Glasersfeld. Edition echoraum, Vienna: 239–261. << Google Scholar

Mitterer J. (1992) Das Jenseits der Philosophie. Wider das dualistische Erkenntnisprinzip. Passagen, Vienna. << Google Scholar

Mitterer J. (2001) Die Flucht aus der Beliebigkeit. Fischer, Frankfurt. << Google Scholar

Pask G. & Curran S. (1982) Microman. Century, London. << Google Scholar

Pask G. (1975) Conversation, cognition and learning. Elsevier, Amsterdam. << Google Scholar

Pask G. (1975) The cybernetics of human learning and performance. Hutchinson, London. << Google Scholar

Pask G. (1976) Conversation theory. applications in education and epistemology. Elsevier, Amsterdam. << Google Scholar

Rescher N. (1994) Philosophical standard-ism.An empiricist approach to philosophical methodology. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh. << Google Scholar

Rescher N. (1998) Complexity. A philosophical overview. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick. << Google Scholar

Rescher N. (2001) Paradoxes. Their roots, range and resolution. Open Court, Chicago. << Google Scholar

Schmidt S. J. (1987) Der Radikale Konstruktivismus: Ein neues Paradigma im interdisziplinären Diskurs. In: Schmidt S. J. (ed.) Der Diskurs des Radikalen Konstruktivismus. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main: 11–88. << Google Scholar

Schmidt S. J. (1992) Kognition und Gesellschaft. Der Diskurs des Radikalen Konstruktivismus II. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. << Google Scholar

Schmidt S. J. (2003) Geschichten & Diskurse. Abschied vom Konstruktivismus. Rowohlt, Reinbek. English translation: Schmidt S. J. (2007) Histories & discourses: Rewriting constructivism. Imprint Academic, Exeter. << Google Scholar

Schmidt S. J. (ed.) (1987) Der Diskurs des Radikalen Konstruktivismus. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. << Google Scholar

Seibt J. (2007) Wilfrid Sellars. Mentis, Paderborn. << Google Scholar

Sellars W. (2002) Der Empirismus und die Philosophie des Geistes. Second edition. Mentis, Paderborn. << Google Scholar

Sellars W. (2007) In the space of reasons. Selected essays of Wilfrid Sellars. Edited by K. Scharp and R. B. Brandom. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. << Google Scholar

Sneed J. D. (1979) The logical structure of mathematical physics. Second enlarged edition. Dordrecht, Reidel. << Google Scholar

Soames S. (2003) Philosophical analysis in the twentieth century. Volume 2: The age of meaning. Princeton University Press, Princeton. << Google Scholar

Soames S. (2007) Reference and description. The case against two dimensionality. Princeton University Press, Princeton. << Google Scholar

Varela F. J. (1979) Principles of biological autonomy. North Holland, New York. << Google Scholar

Watzlawick P. (1981) Die erfundene Wirklichkeit. Wie wissen wir, was wir zu wissen glauben? Beiträge zum Konstruktivismus. Piper, Munich. << Google Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.