Volume 6 · Number 1 · Pages 90–99

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

Footprints in the Sand: Radical Constructivism and the Mystery of the Other

David Kenneth Johnson

Download the full text in
PDF (314 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Context: Few professional philosophers have addressed in any detail radical constructivism, but have focused instead on the related assumptions and limitations of postmodern epistemology, various anti-realisms, and subjective relativism. Problem: In an attempt to supply a philosophical answer to the guest editors’ question, “Why isn’t everyone a radical constructivist?” I address the realist (hence non-radical) implications of the theory’s invocation of “others” as an invariable, observer-independent, “external” constraint. Results: I argue that constructivists cannot consistently defend a radically subjectivist theory of knowing while remaining entirely agnostic about the nature and existence of the larger world (including independent others). That is, any non-solipsistic account of human experience must explicitly acknowledge its extra-subjective, ontological dimension. Implications: It follows that no pedagogical, social, philosophical, or commonsensical insight associated with so-called “trivial” or “social” constructivism survives or receives any support from the move to radical constructivism.

Key words: Ernst von Glasersfeld, solipsism, fictional posits, ontological agnosticism, others, subjects, observer-independence

Citation

Johnson D. K. (2010) Footprints in the sand: Radical constructivism and the mystery of the other. Constructivist Foundations 6(1): 90–99. http://constructivist.info/6/1/090

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Kenny V. (2007) Anyone for Tennis? Conversations with Ernst on Being Sporting about Epistemology

Dykstra Jr. D. (2010) What Can We Learn from the Misunderstandings of Radical Constructivism? Commentary on Slezak’s “Radical Constructivism: Epistemology, Education and Dynamite”

Hiptmair E., Himmelfreundpointner T., Haller A. & Hug T. (2011) Skiing the Ötztaler Wildspitze with Ernst

Quale A. (2010) Objections to Radical Constructivism

Silverman P. S. (2011) My Mentor Ernst von Glasersfeld

References

Devitt M. (1991) Realism and truth. Basil Blackwell, Cambridge. << Google Scholar

Dykstra D. (2007) Against realist instruction: superficial success masking catastrophic failure and an alternative. Constructivist Foundations 1(1): 49–60. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/abstracts/1/1/049.dykstra

Glasersfeld E. von (1989) Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese 80: 121–140. Available at http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/118

Glasersfeld E. von (1989) Facts and the self from a constructivist point of view. Poetics 18: 435–448. Available at http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/122

Glasersfeld E. von (1989) Knowing without metaphysics: Aspects of the radical constructivist position. Educational Resources Information Center ED304344. Reprinted as: Glasersfeld E. von (1991) Knowing without metaphysics: Aspects of the radical constructivist position. In: Steier F. (ed.) Research and reflexivity. Sage, London: 12–29. Available at http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/132

Glasersfeld E. von (1991) An exposition of radical constructivism: Why some like it radical. In: Davis R. B., Maher C. A. & Noddings N. (eds.) Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monographs, Reston VA: 19–29. Available at http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/127

Glasersfeld E. von (1993) Questions rather than answers. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 1(4): 57–59. << Google Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (1995) Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Routledge-Falmer, New York. << Google Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (1996) The view from here. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 3(4): 18–19. << Google Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (2005) Semantricks. Karl Jaspers Forum. Retrieved from http://www.kjf.ca/78-C30GL.htm on 27 October 2010. << Google Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (2007) Some rash conclusions. Constructivist Foundations 3(1): 7–8. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/3/1/007.glasersfeld

Goldin G. (1989) Constructivist epistemology and discovery learning in mathematics. Proceedings of the Psychology of Mathematics Education 13(2): 15–22. << Google Scholar

Johnson D. K. & Silliman M. (2009) Bridges to the world: A dialogue on the construction of knowledge, education, and truth. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam. << Google Scholar

Johnson D. K. (1993) The metaphysics of constructivism. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 1(4): 27–41. << Google Scholar

Johnson D. K. (1996) The view from somewhere: A philosophical critique of radical constructivism. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 3(4): 3–17. << Google Scholar

Johnson D. K. (2004) Subject-object fusion and idealist metaphysics. Karl Jaspers Forum. Retrieved from: http://www.kjf.ca/75-R1MUL.htm on 27 October 2010. << Google Scholar

Johnson D. K. (2005) Between MIR, HIR, and SIR: Constructivism’s pronoun problem. Karl Jaspers Forum. Retrieved from: http://www.kjf.ca/75-R4MUL.htm on 27 October 2010. << Google Scholar

Johnson D. K. (2005) Constructivism de-radicalized. Karl Jaspers Forum. Retrieved from: http://www.kjf.ca/78-C31JO.htm on 27 October 2010. << Google Scholar

Kilpatrick J. (1987) What constructivism might be in mathematics education. Proceedings of the Psychology of Mathematics Education 11(1): 3–27. << Google Scholar

Martinez-Delgado A. (2002) Radical constructivism: Between realism and solipsism. Science Education 86: 840–855. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. R. (1988) Reality: The search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument? Irish Journal of Psychology 9(1): 25–82. << Google Scholar

McCarty L. P. & Schwandt T. A. (2000) Seductive illusions: Von Glasersfeld and Gergen on epistemology and education. In: Phillips D. C. (ed.) Constructivism in education: opinions and second opinions on controversial issues. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 41–86. << Google Scholar

Rorty R. (1979) Philosophy and the mirror of Nature. Princeton University Press, Macon, GA. << Google Scholar

Saalmann G. (2007) Arguments opposing the radicalism of radical constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 3(1): 1–6. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/3/1/001.saalmann

Silliman M. (1994) A separate reality: Response to von Glasersfeld. Thesis XII: A Philosophical Newsletter 2(1): 2. << Google Scholar

Stove D. C. (1991) The Plato cult. Basil Blackwell, Oxford. << Google Scholar

Suchting W. A. (1992) Constructivism deconstructed. Science & Education 1(3): 223–254. << Google Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.