Volume 6 · Number 1 · Pages 100–101

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

Realities in Radical Constructivism. Commentary on Johnson’s “Footprints in the Sand”

Hugh Gash

Download the full text in
PDF (411 kB)

Abstract

Context: Johnson argues that because radical constructivism requires social constraints and therefore ontological assumptions, it is no different from constructive realism, which is comparatively mainstream. Results: While the distinction between these approaches appears slim, our concepts are not independent of us, and may need to change in spite of established traditions. Implications: Perhaps radical constructivism cannot be mainstream because it is essentially concerned with epistemological origins of concepts and consequently is not practical enough for the received consensus.

Key words: epiphany, reality, social, testimony

Citation

Gash H. (2010) Realities in Radical Constructivism. Commentary on Johnson’s “Footprints in the Sand”. Constructivist Foundations 6(1): 100–101. Available at http://constructivist.info/6/1/100.gash

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Gash H. (2011) Maturana’s Theory and Interpersonal Ethics

Kynigos C. (2015) Designing Constructionist E-Books: New Mediations for Creative Mathematical Thinking?

Umpleby S. A. (2016) Second-Order Cybernetics as a Fundamental Revolution in Science

Cadenas H. & Arnold M. (2015) The Autopoiesis of Social Systems and its Criticisms

Hejl P. M. (2011) The Individual in Radical Constructivism. Some Critical Remarks from an Evolutionary Perspective