Volume 6 · Number 1 · Pages 102–111

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

Radical Constructivism: Epistemology, Education and Dynamite

Peter Slezak

Download the full text in
PDF (322 kB)

Abstract

Context: The current situation in philosophy of science includes central, ongoing debates about realism and anti-realism. The same question has been central to the theorising of radical constructivism and, in particular, to its implications for educational theory. However the constructivist literature does not make significant contact with the most important, mainstream philosophical discussions. Problem: Despite its overwhelming influence among educationalists, I suggest that the “radical constructivism” of Ernst Glasersfeld is an example of fashionable but thoroughly problematic doctrines that can have little benefit for practical pedagogy or teacher education. My critique has a positive goal: it is important to understand why constructivism has generated such severe polarization and disputation. A symptom of the problem is the concern with the most abstruse and obdurate problems of philosophy that have no conceivable bearing on educational practice or anything else, for that matter. The diagnosis is confirmed by those pedagogical recommendations that are allegedly derived from radical constructivism that are touted as revolutionary but are platitudes of common sense. I suggest that, ironically, this observation itself provides some pedagogical insight. Method: The approach adopted for the topic is critical, philosophical analysis of the various claims and theses of radical constructivism in the light of philosophy of science and psychology. Results: The findings of the paper are that central theoretical claims of constructivism are couched in an unclear and unnecessary jargon that obscures the implausibility or banality of these claims. Implications: The value of the paper lies in providing an analysis and critique of central, influential claims of radical constructivism both in relation to issues in epistemology and also in relation to the alleged bearing of these claims on pedagogy. It is suggested that, contrary to the claims of radical constructivists, there are few if any implications for practice and applications.

Key words: learning, teaching, metaphysics, epistemology, realism, fallibilism

Citation

Slezak P. (2010) Radical Constructivism: Epistemology, Education and Dynamite. Constructivist Foundations 6(1): 102–111. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/6/1/102.slezak

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

References

Austin J. L. (1962) Sense and sensibilia. Oxford University Press, Oxford. << Google Scholar

Barnes B., Bloor D. & Henry J. (1996) Scientific knowledge: A sociological analysis. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. << Google Scholar

Boden M. A. (1994) Piaget. Fontana, London. << Google Scholar

Cardellini L. (2006) The foundations of radical constructivism: An interview with Ernst von Glasersfeld. Foundations of Chemistry 8: 177–187. << Google Scholar

Cobb P. (1994) Constructivism in mathematics and science education, Educational Researcher 23(7): 4. << Google Scholar

Cobb P. (1994) Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher 23(7): 13–20. << Google Scholar

Driver R., Asoko H., Leach J., Mortimer E. & Scott P. (1994) Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher 23(7): 5–12. << Google Scholar

Ernest P. (1995) Preface by series editor. In: Glasersfeld E. von, Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Falmer Press, London: xi–xii. << Google Scholar

Gale J. E. (1995) Preface. In: Steffe L. P. & Gale J. (eds.) Constructivism in education. Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale NJ: xi–xvii. << Google Scholar

Gergen K. J. (1995) Social construction and educational process. In: Steffe L. P. & Gale J. (eds.) Constructivism in education. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ: 17–40. << Google Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (1989) Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese 80: 121–140. Available at http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/118

Glasersfeld E. von (1993) Questions and answers about radical constructivism. In: Tobin K. (ed.) The Practice of constructivism in science education. Lawrence-Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ: 23–38. Originally published in 1992. Available at http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/151

Glasersfeld E. von (1995) A constructivist approach to teaching. In: Steffe L. P. & Gale J. (eds.) Constructivism in education. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ: 3–16. << Google Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (1995) Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Falmer Press, London. << Google Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (2001) The radical constructivist view of science. Special issue “The impact of radical constructivism on science,” Part 1, edited by A. Riegler. Foundations of science 6(1–3): 31–43. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/pub/fos/pdf/glasersfeld.pdf

Kitcher P. (2001) Real realism: The Galilean strategy. The Philosophical Review 110(2): 151–197. << Google Scholar

Laudan L. (1990) Science & relativism. Chicago University Press, Chicago. << Google Scholar

Matthews M. R. (2000) Appraising constructivism in science and mathematical education. In: Phillips D. C. (ed.) Constructivism in education: Ninety-ninth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1. University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 161–192. << Google Scholar

Matthews M. R. (ed.) (1998) Constructivism in science education. Kluwer, Dordrecht. << Google Scholar

Matthews M. R. (unpublished) Philosophical and pedagogical problems with constructivism. << Google Scholar

McDowell J. (1994) Mind and world. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Meyer D. L. (2008) The poverty of constructivism. Educational Philosophy and Theory 41(3): 332–341. << Google Scholar

Mills C. W. (1959) The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press, Oxford. << Google Scholar

Munzel F. (2003) Kant on moral education, or “englightenment” and the liberal arts. The Review of Metaphysics 57(1): 43–73. << Google Scholar

Nola R. (1998) Constructivism in science and science education: A philosophical critique. In: Matthews M. R. (ed.) Constructivism in science education. Kluwer, Dordrecht: 31–60. << Google Scholar

Orwell G. (1984) Politics and the English language. In: The Penguin essays of George Orwell. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth: 348–360. Originally published in 1946. << Google Scholar

Phillips D. C. (1995) The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher 24(7): 5–12. << Google Scholar

Phillips D. C. (1997) How, why, what, when, and where: Perspectives on constructivism in psychology and education. Issues in Education 3(2): 151–194. << Google Scholar

Phillips D. C. (ed.) (2000) Constructivism in education: Ninety-ninth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. << Google Scholar

Piaget J. (1971) Biology and knowledge. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh. << Google Scholar

Piaget J. (1972) Insights and illusions of philosophy. Routledge, London. << Google Scholar

Piaget J. (1972) Psychology and epistemology. Towards a theory of knowledge. Penguin, Harmondsworth. << Google Scholar

Piaget J. (1999) The construction of reality in the child. Routledge, London. << Google Scholar

Putnam H. (1994) Sense, nonsense, and the senses: An inquiry into the powers of the human mind. The Dewey Lectures at Columbia University 1994. The Journal of Philosophy 91(9): 445–517. << Google Scholar

Quine W. V. (1960) Word and object. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Quine W. V. (1961) Identity, ostension, and hypostasis. In: Quine W. V., From a logical point of view. Second Edition. Harper, New York: 65–79. << Google Scholar

Quine W. V. (1961) Two dogmas of empiricism. In: Quine W. V., From a logical point of view. Second Edition. Harper, New York: 20–46. Originally published in 1951. << Google Scholar

Rorty R. (1979) Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton University Press, Princeton. << Google Scholar

Ruhloff J. (2001) The problematic employment of Reason in philosophy of Bildung and education. In: Heyting F., Lenzen D. & Ponsford White J. (eds.) Methods in philosophy of education. Routledge, London: 57–72. << Google Scholar

Schlick M. (1980) Facts and propositions. In: Schlick M., Philosophical papers: Volume II (1925–1936) Edited by Henk L. Mulder & Barbara F. B. van de Velde-Schlick. Springer, New York: 400–405. Originally published as: Schlick M. (1935) Facts and propositions. Analysis 2(5): 65–70. << Google Scholar

Shotter J. (1995) In dialogue: Social constructionism and radical constructivism. In: Steffe L. P. & Gale J. (eds.) Constructivism in education. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ: 41–56. << Google Scholar

Slezak P. (1994) Laboratory life under the microscope: The sociology of science & science education. Part 2. Science & Education 3(4): 329–355. << Google Scholar

Slezak P. (1994) The sociology of science and science education. Part 1. Science & Education 3(3): 265–294. << Google Scholar

Slezak P. (1997) Review of Barnes, Bloor & Henry: Scientific knowledge: A sociological analysis. Metascience – New Series 11: 44–52. << Google Scholar

Slezak P. (2000) Radical social constructivism. In: Philips D. C. (ed.) National Society for the Study of Education (NSSE) Yearbook. University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 283–307. << Google Scholar

Slezak P. (2007) Is cognitive science relevant to teaching? Journal of Cognitive Science (8): 171–205. << Google Scholar

Sokal A. & Bricmont J. (1998) Intellectual impostures. Profile Books, London. << Google Scholar

Steffe L. P. & Gale J. (eds.) (1995) Constructivism in education. Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale NJ. << Google Scholar

Tobin K. & Tippins D. (1993) Constructivism as a referent for teaching and learning. In: Tobin K. (ed.) The Practice of constructivism in science education. Lawrence-Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ: 3–21. << Google Scholar

Tobin K. (ed.) (1993) The practice of constructivism in science education. Lawrence-Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ. << Google Scholar

van Fraassen B. (1980) The scientific image. Oxford University Press, Oxford. << Google Scholar