Volume 6 · Number 2 · Pages 220–226

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

The Two Epistemologies of Ernst von Glasersfeld

Karl H. Müller

Download the full text in
PDF (281 kB)

Abstract

Purpose: The article pursues three aims. First, it intends to differentiate between two different approaches for knowledge studies, namely an empirical and a normative mode. In a second move, two different epistemologies in the work of Ernst von Glasersfeld will be introduced under the labels of “Epistemology I” and “Epistemology II.” Epistemology I relates to empirical research, Epistemology II is normative in nature. Third, the article makes the point that while Ernst von Glasersfeld’s Epistemology II has already been presented in a finite and mature form, his empirical analysis of cognitive processes still provides a rich pool of tools and designs that should be further developed and advanced in the years and decades ahead. Method: The article is analytical in nature, identifying the different building blocks and relational networks of von Glasersfeld’s two epistemologies. By this, the article intends to contribute to a further advancement of von Glasersfeld’s Epistemology I. Results: The main finding lies in recognizing the radical and innovative elements of von Glasersfeld’s Epistemology I and on the still-challenging research designs of Epistemology I.

Key words: epistemology, theory of knowledge, history of philosophy, philosophy of science, radical constructivism, self-referentiality, viability

Citation

Müller K. H. (2011) The Two Epistemologies of Ernst von Glasersfeld. Constructivist Foundations 6(2): 220–226. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/6/2/220.mueller

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

References

Balashov Y. & Rosenberg A. (eds.) (2004) Philosophy of science. Contemporary readings. Routledge, London. << Google Scholar

Balzer W., Moulines C. U., Sneed J. D. (1987) An architectonic for science. The structuralist program. Reidel, Dordrecht. << Google Scholar

Bauman Z. (2000) Liquid modernity. Polity Press, Cambridge. << Google Scholar

Bunge M. (1999) The sociology–philosophy connection. With a foreword by Raymond Boudon. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick. << Google Scholar

Bunge M. (2002) Philosophy of science. Two volumes. Second printing. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick. << Google Scholar

Bunge M. (2003) Emergence and convergence. Qualitative novelty and the unity of knowledge. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. << Google Scholar

Butler J. (2003) Kritik der ethischen Gewalt. Adorno-Vorlesungen 2002. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main. << Google Scholar

Butler J. (2005) Gefärdetes Leben. Politische Essays. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main. << Google Scholar

Curd M. & Cover J. A. (1998) (eds.) Philosophy of science. The central issues. W. W. Norton, New York. << Google Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (1987) Wissen, Sprache und Wirklichkeit. Arbeiten zum radikalen Konstruktivismus. Vieweg, Braunschweig. << Google Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (1995) Radical constructivism. Falmer Press, London. << Google Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (2005) Radikaler Konstruktivismus – Versuch einer Wissenstheorie (Edited by A. Müller & K. H. Müller). Edition echoraum, Vienna. << Google Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (2007) Key works in radical constructivism. (Edited by Marie Larochelle). Sense, Rotterdam. << Google Scholar

Kreimendahl L. (2011) Einige Bemerkungen zu Humes Auseinandersetzung mit den metaphysischen Argumenten für die Unsterblichkeit der Seele. In: Streminger G. (ed.) David Hume zum 300. Geburtstag. Aufklärung und Kritik 1: 85–99. << Google Scholar

Krieg P. (2005) Die paranoide Maschine. Computer zwischen Wahn und Sinn. Heise, Hannover. << Google Scholar

Lorenz K. R. (1973) Die Rückseite des Spiegels. Versuch einer Naturgeschichte des menschlichen Erkennens. München: Piper. English translation: Lorenz K. R. (1977) Behind the mirror. Methuen, London. << Google Scholar

Lyotard J. F. (1984) The postmodern condition. A report on knowledge. Manchester University Press, Manchester. << Google Scholar

Müller A. & Müller K. H. (eds.) (2007) An unfinished revolution? Von Foerster and the Biological Computer Laboratoty | BCL, 1958 – 1976. Edition echoraum, Vienna. << Google Scholar

Müller K. H. (2007) The BCL. An unfinished revolution of an unfinished revolution. In: Müller A. & Müller K. H. (eds.) (2007) An unfinished revolution? Von Foerster and the Biological Computer Laboratoty | BCL, 1958 – 1976. Edition echoraum, Vienna: 407–466. << Google Scholar

Müller K. H. (2008) The new science of cybernetics. The evolution of living research designs. Volume I: Methodology. Edition echoraum, Vienna. << Google Scholar

Müller U., Carpendale J. I. M. & Smith L. (eds.) (2009) The cambridge companion to Piaget. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. << Google Scholar

Popper K. R. (1975) Objective knowledge. An evolutionary approach. Third edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford. << Google Scholar

Riedl R. (1976) Die Strategie der Genesis. Naturgeschichte der realen Welt. Piper, Munich. << Google Scholar

Roth G. (2011) Hume, Willensfreiheit und Hirnforschung. In: Streminger G. (ed.) David Hume zum 300. Geburtstag. Aufklärung und Kritik 1: 167–183. << Google Scholar

Salmon W. C. (1998) Causality and explanation. Oxford University Press, New York. << Google Scholar

Schmidt S. J. (2003) Geschichten und Diskurse. Abschied vom Konstruktivismus. Rowohlt, Reinbek. << Google Scholar

Schmidt S. J. (2010) Die Endgültigkeit der Vorläufigkeit. Prozessualität als Argumentationsstrategie. Velbrück Wissenschaft, Weilerswist. << Google Scholar

Steffe L. P. (2007) Radical constructivism. A scientific research program. Constructivist Foundations 2(2–3): 41–49. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/2/2–3/041.steffe

Stegmüller W. (1984) Evolutionäre Erkenntnistheorie, Realismus und Wissenschaftstheorie. In: Spaemann R., Koslowski P. & Löw R. (eds.) Evolutionstheorie und menschliches Selbstverständnis. Zur philosophischen Kritik eines Paradigmas moderner Wissenschaft. Acta Humanniora, Weinheim: 5–34. << Google Scholar

Stegmüller W. (1985) Thesen zur “evolutionären Erkenntnistheorie.” Information Philosophie 3: 26–32. << Google Scholar

Vollmer G. (1975) Evolutionäre Erkenntnistheorie. Hirzel, Stuttgart. << Google Scholar