Volume 6 · Number 2 · Pages 248–253

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

The Science Wars Go Local: The Reception of Radical Constructivism in Quebec

Marie Larochelle & Jacques Désautels

Download the full text in
PDF (273 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment


Context: Ernst von Glasersfeld’s constructivist epistemology has been a source of intellectual inspiration for several Quebec researchers, particularly in the field of science and mathematics education. Problem: However, what is less well known is the influence that his work had on the direction taken by educational reform in Quebec in the early 2000s as well as the criticisms that his work has given rise to – some of which present a family resemblance to the science wars that swept over the US and France during the 1990s. Results: We begin by outlining the constructivist orientation of Quebec’s educational reform. We then draw a parallel between the above-mentioned science wars and the critics who denounced the constructivist foundations of the reform. In both cases, the bone of contention concerns the usual interpretation of relativism, with the criticisms that we refer to tending to oppose relativism with realism or rationalism. Now, by definition, relativism stands in opposition to absolutism and not to realism, unless the latter manifests itself in an absolutist form (which is the case of some of the critiques). Implications: The fear generated by relativism is by no means new. However, it seems that more than an epistemological controversy is at stake in the current depreciation of positions that, like that of radical constructivism, question the possibility of a “view from nowhere” – that is, aperspectival objectivity – and the resultant knowledge. In the sphere of education, at least in Quebec, there may well be an ideological issue of control over education that is involved.

Key words: educational reform, relativism, science wars


Larochelle M. & Désautels J. (2011) The science wars go local: The reception of radical constructivism in quebec. Constructivist Foundations 6(2): 248–253. http://constructivist.info/6/2/248

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Quale A. (2008) The Issue of Reductionism. A Radical Constructivist Approach to the Philosophy of Physics

Larochelle M. & Désautels J. (2007) Concerning Ernst von Glasersfeld’s Contribution to Intellectual Freedom: One Interpretation, One Example

Quale A. (2012) On the Role of Constructivism in Mathematical Epistemology

Larochelle M. & Désautels J. (2009) Constructivism and the “Great Divides”

Quale A. (2010) Objections to Radical Constructivism


Astolfi J.-P. (2003) S’affranchir du sens commun pédagogique. In: LIFE (Laboratoire Innovation, Formation, Éducation, Université de Genève) (ed.) L’école entre autorité et zizanie. Chronique Sociale, Lyon, France: 101–107. << Google Scholar

Baillargeon N. (2008) De bien fragiles assises: Le constructivisme radical et les sept péchés capitaux. In: Comeau R. & Lavallée J. (eds.) Contre la réforme pédagogique. VLB éditeur, Montréal QC: 59–84. << Google Scholar

Baillargeon N. (2009) Contre la réforme. La dérive idéologique du système d’éducation québécois. Presses de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal QC. << Google Scholar

Barnes B. (1990) Sociological theories of scientific knowledge. In: Olby R. C., Cantor G. N., Christie J. R. R. & Hodge M. J. S. (eds.) Companion to the history of modern science. Routledge, London: 60–73. << Google Scholar

Bégin R. (2009) Science et enseignement des sciences. Un plaidoyer. Liber, Montréal QC. << Google Scholar

Biagioli M. (1993) Galileo, courtier. The practice of science in the culture of absolutism. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL. << Google Scholar

Bimber B. & Gunston D. H. (1995) Politics by the same means: Government and science in the United States. In: Jasanoff S., Markle G. E., Petersen J. C. & Pinch T. (eds.) Handbook of science and technology studies. Sage, Thousand Oaks CA: 554–571. << Google Scholar

Bloor D. (2007) Epistemic grace: Antirelativism as theology in disguise. Common Knowledge 13(2–3): 250–280. << Google Scholar

Dahan-Dalmedico A. & Pestre D. (1998) Comment parler des sciences aujourd’hui? In: Jurdant B. (ed.) Impostures scientifiques. Les malentendus de l’affaire Sokal. La Découverte/Alliage, Paris: 77–105. << Google Scholar

Daston L. (1992) Objectivity and the escape from perspective. Social Studies of Science 22(4): 597–618. << Google Scholar

Désautels J. & Larochelle M. (2004) Les programmes d’études à l’heure du constructivisme et du socioconstructivisme: Quelques réflexions. In: Jonnaert P. & M’Batika A. (eds.) Les réformes curriculaires. Regards croisés. Presses de l’Université du Québec, Montréal QC: 49–67. << Google Scholar

Devitt M. (1991) Realism and truth. Blackwell, Oxford. << Google Scholar

Dykstra D. I. Jr. (2010) What can we learn from the misunderstandings of radical constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 6(1): 120–126. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/6/1/120.dykstra

Foucault M. (1971) L’ordre du discours. Gallimard, Paris. English translation: Foucault M. (1981) The order of discourse (Translated by I. McLeod). In: Young R. (ed.) Untying the text: A poststructuralist reader. Routledge and Kegan Paul, Boston: 48–78. << Google Scholar

Fourez G. (2002) La construction des sciences. Introduction à la philosophie et à l’éthique des sciences. Fourth revised and expanded Edition. De Boeck Université, Brussels. << Google Scholar

Fourez G. (2007) Knowledge as representation. In: Glasersfeld E. von, Key works in radical constructivism (Edited by M. Larochelle). Sense, Rotterdam: 259–266. << Google Scholar

Gagné G. (2008) Le virage du succès. Sociologie d’une opération. In: Comeau R. & Lavallée J. (eds.) Contre la réforme pédagogique. VLB éditeur, Montréal QC: 29–58. << Google Scholar

Geertz C. (1999) Savoir local, savoir global. Les lieux du savoir. Second edition. (Translated by D. Paulme). Presses universitaires de France, Paris. Originally published in English as: Geertz C. (1983) Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. Basic Books, New York. << Google Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (1992) Constructivism reconstructed: A reply to Suchting. Science & Education 1(4): 379–84. Reprinted in: Matthews M. R. (ed.) Constructivism in science education. Kluwer, Dordrecht: 93–98. << Google Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (2010) Why people dislike radical constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 6(1): 19–21. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/6/1/019.glasersfeld

Gross P. R. & Levitt N. (1994) Higher superstition: The academic left and its quarrels with science. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore MD. << Google Scholar

Gross P. R., Levitt N. & Lewis M. W. (eds.) (1996) The flight from science and reason. The New York Academy of Science, New York. << Google Scholar

Herrnstein Smith B. (2007) Relativism, today and yesterday. Common Knowledge 13(2): 227–249. << Google Scholar

Jonnaert P. & Masciotra D. (eds.) (2004) Constructivisme, choix contemporains. Hommage à Ernst von Glasersfeld. Presses de l’Université du Québec, Montréal QC. << Google Scholar

Jurdant B. (1998) Introduction. In: Jurdant B. (ed.) Impostures scientifiques. Les malentendus de l’affaire Sokal. La Découverte/Alliage, Paris: 7–23. << Google Scholar

Kuhn T. (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions. Second edition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. << Google Scholar

Latour B. (2002) The science wars. A dialogue. Common Knowledge 8(1): 71–79. << Google Scholar

Matthews M. R. (1993) Constructivism and science education: Some epistemological problems. Journal of Science Education and Technology 2(1): 359–370. << Google Scholar

Matthews M. R. (2002) Constructivism and science education: A further appraisal. Journal of Science Education and Technology 11(2): 121–134. << Google Scholar

Mellouki M. (2010) Approche de la réforme de l’éducation au Québec: par touches et retouches. In: Mellouki M. (ed.) Promesses et ratés de la réforme de l’éducation au Québec. Presses de l’Université Laval, Québec QC: 305–326. << Google Scholar

Ministère de l’Éducation du Québec (2001) Programme de formation de l’école québécoise. Éducation préscolaire, enseignement primaire, premier cycle. Le Ministère, Québec QC. Synchronously published in English as: Québec education program. Preschool education, elementary education. << Google Scholar

Ministère de l’Éducation du Québec (2004) Programme de formation de l’école québécoise, enseignement secondaire, premier cycle. Le Ministère, Québec QC. Synchronously published in English as: Québec education program. Secondary school education, cycle one. << Google Scholar

Mitterer J. (2008) (Radical) Constructivism – What difference does it make? Constructivist Foundations 3(3): 160–162. Available at: http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/3/3/160.mitterer << Google Scholar

Quale A. (2007) Radical constructivism, and the sin of relativism. Science & Education 16(3–5): 231–266. << Google Scholar

Schmidt S. J. (2010) Radical constructivism: A tool, not a super theory. Constructivist Foundations 6(1): 6–11. Available at: http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/6/1/006.schmidt << Google Scholar

Slezak P. (2010) Radical constructivism: Epistemology, education and dynamite. Constructivist Foundations 6(1): 102–111. Available at: http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/6/1/102.slezak << Google Scholar

Steffe L. P. (2010) Consequences of rejecting constructivism: “Hold tight and pedal fast.” Constructivist Foundations 6(1): 112–119. Available at: http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/6/1/112.steffe << Google Scholar

Suchting W. A. (1992) Constructivism deconstructed. Science & Education 1(3): 223–254. Reprinted in: Matthews M. R. (ed.) (1998) Constructivism in science education. A philosophical examination. Kluwer, Dordrecht: 61–92. << Google Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.