Volume 7 · Number 1 · Pages 81–83

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

Enaction: An Incomplete Paradigm for Consciousness Science. Review of “Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science” edited by John Stewart, Olivier Gapenne and Ezequiel A. Di Paolo

David A. Reid

Download the full text in
PDF (179 kB)

Abstract

Upshot: According to its introduction, the aim of Enaction is to “present the paradigm of enaction as a framework for a far-reaching renewal of cognitive science as a whole.” While many of the chapters make progress towards this aim, the book as a whole does not present enactivism as a coherent framework, and it could be argued that enactivism’s embrace of phenomenology means it is no longer a theory of cognition.

Citation

Reid D. A. (2011) Enaction: An Incomplete Paradigm for Consciousness Science. Review of “Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science” edited by John Stewart, Olivier Gapenne and Ezequiel A. Di Paolo. Constructivist Foundations 7(1): 81–83. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/7/1/081.reid

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

References

Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Reidel, Dordecht. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1992) The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Second edition. Shambhala, Boston. << Google Scholar

Varela F. J. (1996) Neurophenomenology, a methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies 3: 330–349. << Google Scholar

Varela F. J., Thompson E. & Rosch E. (1991) The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar