Volume 7 · Number 1 · Pages 87–89

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

Realism Redux: Gibson’s Affordances Get a Well-Deserved Update. Review of “Radical Embodied Cognitive Science” by Anthony Chemero

Tom Ziemke

Download the full text in
PDF (199 kB)

Abstract

Upshot: Chemero provides a modern re-interpretation of Gibson’s ecological psychology and his affordance concept that is more coherent than the original and in line with antirepresentationalist, dynamical theories in embodied cognitive science. He argues for a radical embodied cognitive science, in which ecological and enactive approaches join forces against the more watered-down, mainstream embodied cognitive science that still maintains traditional commitments to representationalism and computationalism. He also defends a special version of realism, entity realism, which many constructivists might not find entirely convincing, but which is nevertheless more or less compatible with enactive theories of embodied cognition.

Citation

Ziemke T. (2011) Realism Redux: Gibson’s Affordances Get a Well-Deserved Update. Review of “Radical Embodied Cognitive Science” by Anthony Chemero. Constructivist Foundations 7(1): 87–89. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/7/1/087.ziemke

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

References

Borghi A. M. & Riggio L (2009) Sentence comprehension and simulation of object temporary, canonical and stable affordances. Brain Research 1253: 117–128. << Google Scholar

Chemero A. (1998) A stroll through the worlds of animats and persons: A review of Andy Clark’s Being there. Psyche 4(14) Available at http://theassc.org/files/assc/2369.pdf.

Clark A. (1997) Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Hacking I. (1982) Experimentation and scientific realism. Philosophical Topics 13: 71–82. << Google Scholar

Hacking I. (1983) Representing and intervening. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Reidel, Dordecht. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1987) The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Shambhala, Boston. << Google Scholar

Mizelle J. C. & Wheaton L. A. (2010) The neuroscience of storing and molding tool action concepts: How “plastic” is grounded cognition? Frontiers in Psychology 1, Article 195. Available at http://www.frontiersin.org/cognition/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00195/full

Pellicano A., Thill S., Ziemke T. & Binkofski F. (2011) Affordances, adaptive tool use and grounded cognition. Frontiers in Psychology 2, Article 53. Available at http://www.frontiersin.org/cognition/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00053/full.

Susi T. & Ziemke T. (2005) On the subject of objects: Four views on object perception and tool use. TripleC: Cognition, communication, co-operation 3(2): 6–19. Available at http://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/19.

Thompson E. (2007) Mind in life. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Uexküll J. von (1957) A stroll through the worlds of animals and men – A picture book of invisible worlds. In: Schiller C. H. (ed.) (1957) Instinctive behaviour. The development of a modern concept. International Universities Press, New York: 5–80. German original: Uexküll J. von (1934) Streifzüge durch die Umwelten von Tieren und Menschen. Springer, Berlin. << Google Scholar

Uexküll J. von (1982) The theory of meaning. Semiotica 42(1): 25–82. German original: Uexküll J. von (1940) Bedeutungslehre. Verlag von J. A. Barth, Leipzig. << Google Scholar

Varela F. J., Thompson E. & Rosch E. (1991) The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar