Volume 8 · Number 1 · Pages 5–12

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

Between Realism and Constructivism? Luhmann’s Ambivalent Epistemological Standpoint

Armin Scholl

Download the full text in
PDF (512 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Problem: Is Niklas Luhmann’s theory of social systems based on a constructivist or on a realist epistemology? Luhmann’s own elaborations seem to oscillate between both standpoints. Method: The argumentation provided in this article starts with a detailed reconstruction of Luhmann’s epistemology and of Luhmann’s criticism towards radical constructivism and then examines the consequences for a comparison of systems theory and (radical) constructivism. Results: Although Luhmann’s operative constructivism can be distinguished from radical constructivism, the differences are not considered fundamental. Luhmann’s epistemology is clearly nearer to constructivism than to realism and it shares most of constructivism’s key concepts, such as self-referential logic, a strict relation between observer and observed, and the relativism of reality construction. Implications: Luhmann’s criticism of radical constructivism must be understood in the context of his sociological background. Most of his arguments against radical constructivism can be considered apprehensions of misleading interpretations of radical constructivism rather than of substantial criticism. They may help to clarify a radical constructivist epistemology. Constructivist content: The paper attempts to check whether Luhmann’s theory of social theory is based on (radical) constructivist epistemology.

Key words: Systems theory, epistemology, radical constructivism, social systems

Citation

Scholl A. (2012) Between realism and constructivism? Luhmann’s ambivalent epistemological standpoint. Constructivist Foundations 8(1): 5–12. http://constructivist.info/8/1/005

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Scholl A. (2012) Between Realism and Constructivism? Luhmann’s Ambivalent Epistemological Standpoint

Scholl A. (2013) Exploring Luhmann’s Constructivism. Review of “Ontologien der Moderne” edited by René John et al. and of “Luhmann Handbuch” edited by Oliver Jahraus et al.

Alrøe H. F. & Noe E. (2014) Second-Order Science of Interdisciplinary Research: A Polyocular Framework for Wicked Problems

Müller K. H. (2011) The Two Epistemologies of Ernst von Glasersfeld

Troadec B. (2007) Constructivism, Culture, and Cognitive Development: What Kind of Schemes for a Cultural Psychologist?

References

Aerts D., Broekaert J. & Gabora L. (2011) A case for applying an abstracted quantum formalism to cognition. New Ideas in Psychology 29(1): 136–146. Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0404068

Ansmann M., Wang H., Bialczak R. C., Hofheinz M., Lucero E., Neeley M., O’Connell A. D., Sank D., Weides M., Wenner J., Cleland A. N. & Martinis J. M. (2009) Violation of Bell’s inequality in Josephson phase qubits. Nature 461: 504–506. << Google Scholar

Aspelmeyer M. (2010) Quantum mechanics: The surf is up. Nature 464: 685–686. << Google Scholar

Baecker D. (2012) Systemtheorie als Kommunikationstheorie [System theory as communication theory]. In: Jahraus O., Nassehi A., Grizelj M., Saake I., Kirchmeier C. & Müller J. (eds.) Luhmann Handbuch. Leben – Werk – Wirkung [Luhmann Handbook. Life – Work – Impact]. Metzler, Stuttgart: 52–57. << Google Scholar

Christis J. (2001) Luhmann’s theory of knowledge: beyond realism and constructivism? Soziale Systeme 7(2): 328–349. << Google Scholar

Derrida J. (2010) Voice and phenomenon: Introduction to the problem of the sign in Husserl’s phenomenology. Northwestern University University Press, Evanston IL. << Google Scholar

Egner H. (2008) Gesellschaft, Mensch, Umwelt – beobachtet. Ein Beitrag zur Theorie der Geographie [Society, humans, environment – observed. A contribution to the theory of geography]. Franz Steiner, Stuttgart. << Google Scholar

Egner H. (2012) Jenseits der Dichotomie von “Sinn” und “Materie.” Ein neues Metaparadigma am Horizont? [Beyond the dichotomy of “meaning” and “matter”. A new meta paradigm on the horizon?] In: Weixlbaumer N. (ed.) Anthologie zur Sozialgeographie [Anthology of social geography]. Institut für Geographie und Regionalforschung, Wien: 35–51. << Google Scholar

Esser H. (2002) Wo steht die Soziologie? [Where does sociology stand?] Soziologie 4: 20–32. << Google Scholar

Gell-Mann M. & Hartle J. B. (2012) Decoherent Histories Quantum Mechanics with One “Real”-Fine-Grained History. Quantum Physics A85: 062120. << Google Scholar

Gell-Mann M. (1995) The quark and the jaguar. Adventures in the simplex and the complex. Abacus, London. << Google Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (1981) The concepts of adaptation and viability in a radical constructivist theory of knowledge. In: Siegel I. E., Brodzinsky D. M. & Golinkoff R. M. (eds.) New directions in Piagetian theory and practice. Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ: 87–95. Available at http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/067

Glasersfeld E. von (1984) An introduction to radical constructivism. In: Watzlawick P. (ed.) The invented reality. Norton, New York: 17–40. Available at http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/070.1

Glasersfeld E. von (1993) Nicht bekehrt, aber geläutert [Not converted but refined]. Soziologische Revue 16(3): 288–290. Available at http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/153

Heider F. (2005) Ding und Medium. Mit einem Vorwort von Dirk Baecker [Object and medium. With a foreword by Dirk Baecker]. Kadmos: Berlin. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1986) Systeme verstehen Systeme [Systems understand systems]. In: Luhmann N. & Schorr K. E. (eds.) Zwischen Intransparenz und Verstehen. Fragen an die Pädagogik [Between nontransparancy and understanding. Questions for pedagogy]. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main: 72–117. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1986) The autopoiesis of social systems. In: Geyer F. & Zouwen J. van der (eds.) Sociocybernetic paradoxes. observation, control and evolution of self-steering systems. Sage, London: 172–192. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1988) Erkenntnis als Konstruktion [Knowledge as construction]. Benteli, Bern. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1988) Selbstreferentielle Systeme [self-referential systems]. In: Simon F. B. (ed.) Lebende Systeme. Wirklichkeitskonstruktionen in der systemischen Therapie [Living systems. Reality constructions in systematic therapy]. Springer, Berlin: 47–53. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1990) Das Erkenntnisprogramm des Konstruktivismus und die unbekannt bleibende Realität [Constructivism’s program of knowledge and the reality that remains unknown]. In: Luhmann N., Soziologische Aufklärung. Band 5. Konstruktivistische Perspektiven [Sociological enlightenment. Volume 5: Constructivist perspectives]. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen: 31–57. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1990) Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft [The science of society]. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1992) Beobachtungen der Moderne [Observations of the modern age]. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1992) Stellungnahme [Statement]. In: Krawietz W. & Welker M. (eds.) Kritik der Theorie sozialer Systeme [Criticism of the theory of social systems]. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main: 371–386. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1994) Der “Radikale Konstruktivismus” als Theorie der Massenmedien? Bemerkungen zu einer irreführenden Debatte [Radical constructivism as a theory of mass media? Some remarks on a misleading debate]. Communicatio Socialis 27(1): 7–12. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1995) Social Systems. Translated by John Bednarz Jr. with Dirk Baecker. Foreword by Eva M. Knodt. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (2004) Ökologische Kommunikation [Ecological communication]. Fourth edition. Leske + Budrich, Opladen. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. & Poerksen B. (2004) From being to doing. The origins of the biology of cognition. Imprint Academic, Exeter UK. German original published in 2001. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. R. (1988) Reality: The search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument. The Irish Journal of Psychology 9(1): 25–82. Available at http://www.enolagaia.com/M88Reality.html

Merten K. (2005) Reaktivität und Reflexivität: Sozialwissenschaftliche Datenerhebung als interferierende Kommunikationsprozesse [Reactivity and reflexivity: Social scientific data collection as interfering communication processes]. In: Wienand E., Westerbarkey J. & Scholl A. (eds.) Kommunikation über Kommunikation. Theorie, Methoden und Praxis [Communication about communication: Theory, methods, and practice]. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden: 102–128. << Google Scholar

Mitterer J. (2008) (Radical) constructivism: What differences does it make? Constructivist Foundations 3(3): 160–162. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/3/3/160.mitterer

Nassehi A. (1992) Wie wirklich sind Systeme? Zum ontologischen und epistemologischen Status von Luhmanns Theorie selbstreferentieller Systeme [How real are systems? On the ontological and epistemological status of Luhmann’s theory of self-referential systems]. In: Krawietz W. & Welker M. (eds.) Kritik der Theorie sozialer Systeme. Auseinandersetzungen mit Luhmanns Hauptwerk [Critique of the theory of social systems. Debating Luhmann’s magnus opum]. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main: 43–70. << Google Scholar

Nassehi A. (2008) Die Zeit der Gesellschaft. Auf dem Weg zu einer soziologischen Theorie der Zeit [The time of society. Towards a sociological theory of time]. Second Edition. VS-Verlag, Wiesbaden. << Google Scholar

Nassehi A. (2012) Luhmann und Husserl [Luhmann and Husserl]. In: Oliver J., Nassehi A., Grizelj M., Saake I., Kirchmeier C. & Müller J. (eds.) Luhmann Handbuch. Leben – Werk – Wirkung [Luhmann Handbook. Life – Work – Impact]. Metzler, Stuttgart: 13–19. << Google Scholar

Proulx J. (2008) Some differences between Maturana and Varela’s theory of cognition and constructivism. Complicity 5(1): 11–26. << Google Scholar

Schlosshauer M. A. (2007) Decoherence and the quantum-to-classical transition. Springer, Berlin. << Google Scholar

Schmidt S. J. (1987) Der Diskurs des Radikalen Konstruktivismus [The discourse of radical constructivism]. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main. << Google Scholar

Schmidt S. J. (2011) From objects to processes: A proposal to rewrite radical constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 7(1): 1–9. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/7/1/001.schmidt

Scholl A. (2008) Non-dualizing philosophy and empirical research. Constructivist Foundations 3(3): 172–180. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/3/3/172.scholl

Schrödinger E. (1959) Das arithmetische Paradoxon – Die Einheit des Bewusstseins [The arithmetical paradox – The unity of consciousness]. In: Schrödinger E. (ed.) Geist und Materie [Mind and matter]. Vieweg, Braunschweig: 39–51. << Google Scholar

Walther P., Resch K. J., Brukner Č. & Zeilinger A. (2006) Experimental entagled entaglement. Physical Review Letters 97: 020501. Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0508183

Zeilinger A. (1996) On the interpretation and philosophical foundation of quantum mechanics. In: Ketvel U. (ed.) Vastakohtien todellisuus. Festschrift for K. V. Laurikainen. University Press Helsinki. << Google Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.