Open peer commentary on the article “Luhmann and the Constructivist Heritage: A Critical Reflection” by Armin Scholl. Upshot: The comment starts with Buchinger’s assessment that Luhmann’s contribution to constructivism is original and inspiring, but raises more questions than answers. In three variations, the comment tries to show that Luhmann can indeed be viewed as a big question-generator and that his heritage for radical constructivism may lie in the original and inspiring effects these new and additional questions can produce.
Müller K. H. (2012) A circular comment on luhmann as a question generator. Constructivist Foundations 8(1): 28–30. http://constructivist.info/8/1/028
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.