Volume 8 · Number 1 · Pages 39–52

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

Observing Environments

Hugo F. Alrøe & Egon Noe

Download the full text in
PDF (718 kB)

Abstract

Context: Society is faced with “wicked” problems of environmental sustainability, which are inherently multiperspectival, and there is a need for explicitly constructivist and perspectivist theories to address them. Problem: However, different constructivist theories construe the environment in different ways. The aim of this paper is to clarify the conceptions of environment in constructivist approaches, and thereby to assist the sciences of complex systems and complex environmental problems. Method: We describe the terms used for “the environment” in von Uexküll, Maturana & Varela, and Luhmann, and analyse how their conceptions of environment are connected to differences of perspective and observation. Results: We show the need to distinguish between inside and outside perspectives on the environment, and identify two very different and complementary logics of observation, the logic of distinction and the logic of representation, in the three constructivist theories. Implications: Luhmann’s theory of social systems can be a helpful perspective on the wicked environmental problems of society if we consider carefully the theory’s own blind spots: that it confines itself to systems of communication, and that it is based fully on the conception of observation as indication by means of distinction.

Key words: Umwelt, phenomenology, biosemiotics, autopoiesis, perspectivism, Peirce; environment, observing, Luhmann, Uexküll, Maturana , Varela, observer

Citation

Alrøe H. F. & Noe E. (2012) Observing Environments. Constructivist Foundations 8(1): 39–52. Available at http://constructivist.info/8/1/039

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Brier S. (2009) Cybersemiotic Pragmaticism and Constructivism

Urrestarazu H. (2014) Social Autopoiesis?

Riegler A. & Scholl A. (2012) Niklas Luhmann and the Sociological Turn in Constructivism

Cadenas H. & Arnold M. (2015) The Autopoiesis of Social Systems and its Criticisms

Mascolo R. (2011) The Bioethical Dimension of Maturana’s Thought

References

Alrøe H. F. & Kristensen E. S. (2002) Towards a systemic research methodology in agriculture: Rethinking the role of values in science. Agriculture and Human Values 19(1): 3–23. << Google Scholar

Alrøe H. F. & Kristensen E. S. (2003) Toward a systemic ethic: In search of an ethical basis for sustainability and precaution. Environmental Ethics 25(1): 59–78. << Google Scholar

Alrøe H. F. & Noe E. (2008) What makes organic agriculture move – protest, meaning or market? A polyocular approach to the dynamics and governance of organic agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 7(1/2): 5–22. << Google Scholar

Alrøe H. F. & Noe E. (2011) The paradox of scientific expertise: A perspectivist approach to knowledge asymmetries. Fachsprache – International Journal of Specialized Communication XXXIV(3–4): 152–167. << Google Scholar

Alrøe H. F. (2000) Science as systems learning: Some reflections on the cognitive and communicational aspects of science. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 7(4): 57–78. << Google Scholar

Andersen N. Å. (2003) The undecidability of decision. In: Bakken T. & Hernes T. (eds.) Autopoietic organization theory. Copenhagen Business School Press, Oslo: 235–258. << Google Scholar

Bammer G. & Smithson M. (eds.) (2008) Uncertainty and risk: Multidisciplinary perspectives. Earthscan Risk in Society Series, London. << Google Scholar

Bateson G. (1972) Steps to an ecology of mind. Ballentine Books, New York. << Google Scholar

Beer R. (1995) A dynamical systems perspective on agent-environment interaction. Artificial Intelligence 72(1–2): 173–215. << Google Scholar

Beus C. E. & Dunlap R. E. (1994) Agricultural paradigms and the practice of agriculture. Rural Sociology 59: 620–635. << Google Scholar

Brier S. (1999) Biosemiotics and the foundation of cybersemiotics. Semiotica 127(1/4): 169–198. << Google Scholar

Brier S. (2001) Cybersemiotics and umweltlehre. Semiotica 13: 779–814. << Google Scholar

Brier S. (2008) Cybersemiotics: Why information is not enough. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. << Google Scholar

Brier S. (2009) Cybersemiotic pragmaticism and constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 5(1): 19–38. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/5/1/019.brier

Brooks R. (1986) Achieving artificial intelligence through building robots. MIT AI Lab Memo No. 899. << Google Scholar

Brooks R. (1991) Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence 47: 139–159. << Google Scholar

Brundtland G. H. (1987) Our common future. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 42/187. Oxford University Press, Oxford. << Google Scholar

Buchanan B. (2008) Onto-ethologies. The animal environments of Uexküll, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, and Deleuze. SUNY Press, Albany. << Google Scholar

Capdepuy P., Polani D. & Nehaniv C. (2007) Constructing the basic Umwelt of artificial agents: An information-theoretic approach. In: Almeida e Costa F., Rocha L., Costa E.,  Harvey I. & Coutinho A. (eds.) Advances in artificial life. Proceedings of the 2007 European conference on artificial life. Springer, Berlin: 375–383. << Google Scholar

Chien J.-P. (2007) Umwelt, milieu(x) and environment. Semiotica 167(1): 65–89. << Google Scholar

Cilliers, Paul (2005) Complexity, deconstruction and relativism. Theory, Culture & Society 22(5): 255–267. << Google Scholar

Clark A. (1997) Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Crosset T. & Beal B. (1997) The use of “subculture” and “subworld” in ethnographic works on sport. Sociology of Sport Journal 14(1): 73–85. << Google Scholar

Deely J. (2001) Umwelt. Semiotica 134(1/4): 125–135. << Google Scholar

Emmeche C. (2001) Does a robot have an Umwelt? Reflections on the qualitative biosemiotics of Jakob von Uexküll. Semiotica 134(1/4): 653–693. << Google Scholar

Foerster H. von (1981) Observing systems. Intersystems, Seaside CA. << Google Scholar

Foerster H. von (2003) On constructing a reality. In: Understanding understanding. Essays on cybernetics and cognition. Springer, New York: 211–228. Originally published in 1973. << Google Scholar

Franklin S. & Graesser A. (1997) Is it an agent, or just a program? A taxonomy for autonomous agent. In: Müller J., Wooldridge M. & Jennings N. (eds.) Intelligent agents III: Agent theories, architectures and languages. Springer Verlag, Berlin: 21–35. << Google Scholar

Froese T. & Ziemke T. (2009) Enactive artificial intelligence: Investigating the systemic organization of life and mind. Artificial Intelligence 173: 466–500. << Google Scholar

Fuchs P. (2004) Der Sinn der Beobachtung. Velbrück Wissenschaft:Weilerswist. Available at http://www.uboeschenstein.ch/texte/fuchs11.html

Glasersfeld E. von (1995) Radical constructivism. A way of knowing and learning. The Falmer Press, London. << Google Scholar

Goodland R. (1995) The concept of environmental sustainability. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26: 1–24. << Google Scholar

Graumann C. F. (1983) Umwelt. In: Harré R. & Lamb R. (eds.) The encyclopedic dictionary of psychology. Blackwell Reference, Oxford: 647. << Google Scholar

Harré R. (1990) Exploring the human Umwelt. In: Bhaskar R. (ed.) Harré and his critics. Basil Blackwell, Oxford: 297–364. << Google Scholar

Headland T. N., Pike K. L. & Harris M. (eds.) (1990) Emics and etics: The insider/outsider debate. Sage Publications, Newbury Park CA. << Google Scholar

Hellmann K.-U. (1996) Einleitung. In: Luhmann N. (1996) Protest. Systemtheorien und soziale Bewegungen. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main: 7–45. << Google Scholar

Hoffmeyer J. (1996) Signs of meaning in the universe. Indiana University Press, Bloomington. << Google Scholar

Horn J. & Wilburn D. (2005) The embodiment of learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory 37(5): 745–760. << Google Scholar

Kant I. (1998) Critique of pure reason. Second edition B. Translated by P. Guyer & A. W. Wood. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. German original published in 1787. << Google Scholar

Kåhre P. (2009) På AI-teknikens axlar: Om kunskapssociologin och stark artificiell intelligens [On the shoulders of AI-technology: Sociology of knowledge and strong artificial intelligence]. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Sociology, Lund University, Sweden. << Google Scholar

Kåhre P. (2010) Luhmanns massmedieteori och Internet som ett artificiellt intelligent semiotiskt system [Luhmann’s mass-media theory and Internet as an artificial intelligent semiotic system]. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research 26: 81–93. << Google Scholar

Krause D. (2001) Luhmann-Lexikon. Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart << Google Scholar

Krause D. (2005) Luhmann-Lexikon. Fourth edition. Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart. << Google Scholar

Kull K. (1999) Biosemiotics in the twentieth century. A view from biology. Semiotica 127(1/4): 385–414. << Google Scholar

Kull K. (2001) Jakob von Uexküll: An introduction. Semiotica 134(1/4): 1–59. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1973) Zweckbegriff und Systemrationalität. Über die Funktion von Zwecken in sozialen Systemen. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1982) Autopoiesis, Handlung und Kommunikative Verständigung. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 11(4): 366–379. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1986) Ökologische Kommunikation. Kann die moderne Gesellschaft sich auf ökologische Gefährdungen einstellen? Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1989) Ecological communication. Polity Press, Cambridge MA. German original published in 1986. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1990) Essays on self-reference. Columbia University Press, New York. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1992) Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1992) Sthenographie. In: Luhmann N., Maturana H., Namiki M., Redder V. & Varela F. J. (eds.) Beobachter. Konvergenz der Erkenntnistheorien? Wilhelm Fink, Munich: 119–138. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1995) Social systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford. Originally published in German as: Luhmann N. (1984) Soziale Systeme. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1997) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft, 2 Volumes. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1998) Erkendelse som konstruktion. In: Hermansen M. (ed.) Fra læringens horisont. Forlaget Klim, Århus: 163–184. Originally published in German as: Luhmann N. (1988) Erkenntnis als Konstruktion. Benteli Verlag, Bern. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (2002) Einführung in die Systemtheorie. Edited by Dirk Baecker. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (2006) System as difference. Organization 13(1): 37–57. Edited and translated transcript of a lecture held in 1991. Originally published in German as: Luhmann N. (2004) Einführung in die Systemtheorie, Second edition, edited by Dirk Baecker. Carl-Auer-Systeme Verlag, Heidelberg. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (2008) Die Moral der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. << Google Scholar

Macinnes I. & Di Paolo E. (2005) From the inside looking out: Self extinguishing perceptual cues and the constructed worlds of animats. In: Capcarrere M., Alves Freitas A., Bentley P., Johnson C. & Timmis J. (eds.) Advances in artificial life. Proceedings of the 2005 European conference on artificial life. Springer, Berlin: 11–20. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition. The realization of the living. D. Reidel, Dordrecht. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1998) The tree of knowledge. Revised edition. Shambhala, Boston. Originally published in 1987. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. R. (1988) Ontology of observing: The biological foundations of self-consciousness and the physical domain of existence. In: Donaldson R. E. (ed.) Texts in cybernetic theory: An in-depth exploration of the thought of Humberto Maturana, William T. Powers, and Ernst von Glasersfeld. American Society for Cybernetics (ASC) conference workbook. Available at http://www.inteco.cl/biology/ontology/index.htm

Maturana H. R. (2004) The origin and conservation of self-consciousness: Reflections on four questions by Heinz von Foerster. Kybernetes 34(1–2): 54–88. << Google Scholar

Melhuish C., Ieropoulos I., Greenman J. & Horsfield I. (2006) Energetically autonomous robots: Food for thought. Autonomous Robots 21: 187–198. << Google Scholar

Montebelli A., Lowe R. & Ziemke T. (in press) Towards metabolic robotics: Insights from modeling embodied cognition in a bio-mechatronic symbiont. Artificial Life. << Google Scholar

Moreno A., Etxeberria A. & Umerez J. (2008) The autonomy of biological individuals and artificial models. BioSystems 91(2): 309–319. << Google Scholar

Nöth W. (1997) Representation in semiotics and in computer science. Semiotica 115(3/4): 203–213. << Google Scholar

Nöth W. (2011) Some neglected semiotic premises of some radically constructivist conclusions. Constructivist Foundations 7(2): 12–14. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/7/2/011.noeth

Nirenburg S. & Raskin V. (1987) The subworld concept lexicon and the lexicon management system. Computational Linguistics 13(3–4): 276–289. << Google Scholar

Noe E. & Alrøe H. F. (2003) Farm enterprises as self-organizing systems: A new transdisciplinary framework for studying farm enterprises? International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 11(1): 3–14. << Google Scholar

Noe E. & Alrøe H. F. (2006) Combining Luhmann and Actor-Network Theory to see farm enterprises as self-organizing systems. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 13(1): 34–48. << Google Scholar

Noe E. & Alrøe H. F. (2012) Observing farming systems: Insights from social systems theory. In: Darnhofer I., Gibbon D. & Dedieu B. (eds.). Farming systems research into the 21st century: The new dynamic. Springer, Dordrecht: 387–403. << Google Scholar

Noe E., Alrøe H. F. & Langvad A. M. S. (2008) A polyocular framework for research on multifunctional farming and rural development. Sociologia Ruralis 48(1): 1–15. << Google Scholar

Norton B. G. (2012) The ways of wickedness. Analyzing messiness with messy tools. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25: 447–465. << Google Scholar

Palmquist S. (1993) Kant’s system of perspectives: An architectonic interpretation of the critical philosophy. University Press of America, Lanham MD. << Google Scholar

Paull J. (2006) The farm as organism: The foundational idea of organic agriculture. Elementals: Journal of Bio-Dynamics Tasmania 83: 14–18. << Google Scholar

Peirce C. S. (1994) CP: The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Electronic edition reproducing Past Masters. Hartshorne C. & Weiss P. (eds.) (1931–1935) Volumes I–VI. Harvard University Press, Cambridge; Burks A. (ed.) (1958) Volumes VII–VIII. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Intelex Corporation, Charlottesville. All quotes referring to Peirce’s collected papers are abbreviated as “CP volume.pagenumber.” << Google Scholar

Prem E. (1997) Epistemic autonomy in models of living systems. In: Proceedings of the fourth European conference on artificial life. MIT Press, Cambridge MA: 2–9. << Google Scholar

Ransdell J. (1997) Is Peirce a phenomenologist? The Peirce Group’s Arisbe, Institute for American Thought. Retrieved from http://www.cspeirce.com/menu/library/aboutcsp/ransdell/phenom.htm on 25 September 2012. << Google Scholar

Ransdell J. (2007) On the use and abuse of the immediate/dynamical object distinction. The Peirce Group’s Arisbe, Institute for American Thought. Retrieved from http://www.cspeirce.com/menu/library/aboutcsp/ransdell/useabuse.htm on 25 September 2012. << Google Scholar

Rittel H. W. J. & Webber M. M. (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences 4: 155–169. << Google Scholar

Sørensen M. & Ziemke T. (2007) Agents without agency? Cognitive Semiotics 0: 102–124. << Google Scholar

Schmidt S. (2010) Radical constructivism: A tool, not a super theory! Constructivist Foundations 6(1): 6–11. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/6/1/006.schmidt

Sebeok T. (2001) Biosemiotics: Its roots, proliferation and prospects. Semiotica 134(1/4): 61–78. << Google Scholar

Sorokin P. (1975) Hunger as factor in human affairs. University of Florida Press, Gainesville. << Google Scholar

Spencer-Brown G. (2009) Laws of form. Fifth edition. Bohmeier Verlag, Leipzig. Originally published in 1969. << Google Scholar

Stjernfelt F. (2011) Simple animals and complex biology: Uexküll’s twofold influence on Cassirer’s philosophy. Synthese 179: 169–186. << Google Scholar

Sutrop U. (2001) Umwelt – word and concept. Two hundred years of semantic change. Semiotica 134(1/4): 447–462. << Google Scholar

Uexküll J. von (1957) A stroll through the worlds of animals and men – a picture book of invisible worlds. In: Schiller C. (ed.) Instinctive behaviour – The development of a modern concept. International Universities Press, New York: 319–391. << Google Scholar

Uexküll J. von (1973) Theoretische Biologie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. Reprint of second edition from 1928. English translation of the first edition: Uexküll J. von (1926) Theoretical biology. Harcourt, Brace & Co., New York. << Google Scholar

Uexküll J. von (1982) The theory of meaning. Semiotica 42(1): 25–82. Originally published in German as: Uexküll J. von (1940) Bedeutungslehre. J. A. Barth, Leipzig. << Google Scholar

Uexküll J. von (1992) A stroll through the worlds of animals and men. A picture book of invisible worlds. Semiotica 89(4): 319–391. Reprint from Schiller C. H. (ed.) (1957) Instinctive behavior: The development of a modern concept. International Universities Press, New York: 5–82. Originally published in German as: Uexküll J. von & Kriszat O. (1934) Streifzüge durch die Umwelten von Tieren und Menschen. Springer, Berlin. << Google Scholar

Uexküll T. von (1992) Introduction – the sign theory of Jakob von Uexküll. Semiotica 89(4): 279–316. << Google Scholar

Varela F. J. (1979) Principles of biological autonomy. Elsevier, Amsterdam. << Google Scholar

Varela F. J. (1991) Organism: A meshwork of selfless selves. In: Tauber A. I. (ed.) Organism and the origins of self. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: 79–107. << Google Scholar

Varela F. J. (1997) Patterns of life: Intertwining identity and cognition. Brain and Cognition 34: 72–87. << Google Scholar

Varela F. J., Maturana H. & Uribe R. (1974) Autopoiesis: The organization of living systems, its characterization and a model. BioSystems 5: 187–196. << Google Scholar

Varela F. J., Thompson E. & Rosch E. (1991) The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Ziemke T. & Lowe R. (2009) On the role of emotion in embodied cognitive architectures: From organisms to robots. Cognitive Computation 1(1): 104–117. << Google Scholar

Ziemke T. & Sharkey N. E. (2001) A stroll through the worlds of robots and animals. Applying Jakob von Uexküll’s theory of meaning to adaptive robots and artificial life. Semiotica 134(1/4): 701–746. << Google Scholar

Ziemke T. (2001) The construction of “reality” in the robot. Foundations of Science 6(1): 163–233. << Google Scholar

Ziemke T. (2007) The embodied self – Theories, hunches and robot models. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14(7): 167–179. << Google Scholar

Ziemke T. (2007) What’s life got to do with it? In: Chella A. & Manzotti R. (eds.) Artificial consciousness. Imprint Academic, Exeter. << Google Scholar

Ziemke T. (2008) On the role of emotion in biological and robotic autonomy. BioSystems 91: 401–408. << Google Scholar

Ziemke T., Zlatev J. & Frank R. (eds.) (2007) Body, language and mind. Volume 1: Embodiment. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. << Google Scholar