Volume 8 · Number 1 · Pages 85-92

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

Radical Constructivism and Radical Constructedness: Luhmann’s Sociology of Semantics, Organizations, and Self-Organization

Loet Leydesdorff

Download the full text in
PDF (500 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Context: Using radical constructivism, society can be considered from the perspective of asking the question, “Who conceives of society?” In Luhmann’s social systems theory, this question itself is considered as a construct of the communication among reflexive agents. Problem: Structuration of expectations by codes operating in interhuman communications positions both communicators and communications in a multi-dimensional space in which their relations can be provided with meaning at the supra-individual level. The codes can be functionally different and symbolically generalized. Method: More than Luhmann, I focus on the hypothetical status of the communication of meaning and the uncertainty involved. Meaning can be communicated because of reflexivity in interhuman communications; meaning cannot be observed. Results: The communication (and reflexive translation) of denotations between semantic domains can generate “horizons of meaning” as reflexive orders that remain structurally coupled to individual minds. This elusive order contains a trade-off between “organization” at interfaces integrating (differently coded) expectations at each moment of time, and the potential of further differentiation among symbolically generalized codes of communication in a “self-organization” over time. Implications: One can model the coding in the communication of meaning as latent variables (eigenvectors) that evolve as an implication of the interacting intentions and expectations. The structure of expectations can be visualized (at each moment) and animated (over time) using semantic maps. The self-organizing horizons of meaning operate in a multidimensional space different from the network topology, and at another pace, since meaning is provided to events from the perspective of hindsight. Constructivist content: This perspective of the radical constructedness of social reality transforms the status of agency and organization in sociological theorizing from a source of change to a resource of communicative competencies and reflexive performativity.

Key words: Constructivism, sociology, Luhmann, supra-individual, self-organization, intentionality.

Citation

Leydesdorff L. (2012) Radical constructivism and radical constructedness: Luhmann’s sociology of semantics, organizations, and self-organization. Constructivist Foundations 8(1): 85-92. http://constructivist.info/8/1/085

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Urrestarazu H. (2014) Social Autopoiesis?

Dodig-Crnkovic G. (2014) Info-computational Constructivism and Cognition

Müller K. H. (2010) The Radical Constructivist Movement and Its Network Formations

Cadenas H. & Arnold M. (2015) The Autopoiesis of Social Systems and its Criticisms

Ulrich C., Tillema E. S., Hackenberg A. J. & Norton A. (2014) Constructivist Model Building: Empirical Examples From Mathematics Education

References

Achterbergh J. & Vriens D. (2009) Organizations: Social systems conducting experiments. Springer, Dordrecht. << Google Scholar

Archer M. S. (1995) Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. << Google Scholar

Ashmore M. (1989) The reflexivity thesis: Wrighting sociology of scientific knowledge. Chicago University Press, Chicago. << Google Scholar

Bateson G. (1972) Steps to an ecology of mind. Ballantine, New York. << Google Scholar

Bazerman C. (1988) Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison WI. << Google Scholar

Beer S. A. (1984) The viable system model: Its provenance, development, methodology and pathology. Journal of the Operational Research Society 35(1): 7–25. << Google Scholar

Bhaskar R. (1998) Societies. In: Archer M., Bhaskar R., Collier A., Lawson T. & Norrie A. (eds.) Critical realism: Essential readings. Routledge, London: 206–257. << Google Scholar

Burt R. S. (1982) Toward a structural theory of action. Academic Press: New York. << Google Scholar

Callon M. & Latour B. (1981) Unscrewing the big Leviathan: How actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In: Knorr-Cetina K. D. & Cicourel A. V. (eds.) Advances in social theory and methodology.Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London: 277–303. << Google Scholar

Callon M., Law J. & Rip A. (eds.) (1986) Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. Macmillan, London. << Google Scholar

Deacon T. W. (1997) The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. W. W. Norton, New York. << Google Scholar

Derrida J. (2004) Dissemination. Continuum, London. << Google Scholar

Distin K. (2011) Cultural evolution: By means of natural and artefactual languages. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. << Google Scholar

Dubois D. M. (1998) Computing anticipatory systems with incursion and hyperincursion. In: Dubois D. M. (ed.) Computing anticipatory systems. American Institute of Physics, Woodbury NY: 3–29. << Google Scholar

Dubois D. M. (2003) Mathematical foundations of discrete and functional systems with strong and weak anticipations. In: Butz M. V., Sigaud O. & Gérard P. (eds.) Anticipatory behavior in adaptive learning systems). Springer, Berlin: 110–132. << Google Scholar

Eisenstein E. L. (1979) The printing press as an agent of change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. << Google Scholar

Elias N. (2000) The civilization process: The history of manners. Oxford: Blackwell. Originally published in 1969. << Google Scholar

Füllsack M. (2009) Antizipation und ihre Formalisierung. Zur Simulation sozialer Systeme nach Loet Leydesdorff. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 34(3): 62–81. << Google Scholar

Füllsack M. (2012) Communication emerging? On simulating Structural Coupling in Multiple Contingency. Constructivist Foundations 8(1): 103–110 (This issue). Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/8/1/103.fuellsack

Foerster H. von (1960) On self-organizing systems and their environments. In: Yovits M. C. & Cameron S. (eds.) Self-organizing systems. Pergamon Press, London: 31–50. Reprinted in: Foerster H. von (2003) Understanding understanding: Essays on cybernetics and cognition. Springer, New York: 1–19. << Google Scholar

Foerster H. von (1979) Cybernetics of cybernetics. In: Krippendorff K. (ed.) Communication and control in society. Gordon and Breach, New York: 5–8. << Google Scholar

Foerster H. von (1993) Für Niklas Luhmann: Wie rekursiv ist Kommunikation. Teoria Sociologica 2: 61–85. English translation: For Niklas Luhmann: How recursive is communication? In: Foerster H. von (2003) Understanding understanding: Essays on cybernetics and cognition. Translated by Richard Howe. Springer, New York: 305–323. << Google Scholar

Foucault M. (1970) The order of things: An archeology of the human sciences. Tavistock Publications, London. French original: Foucault M. (1966) Les mots et les choses: Une archéologie des sciences humaines. Gallimard, Paris. << Google Scholar

Freeman C. & Perez C. (1988) Structural crises of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour. In: Dosi G., Freeman C., Nelson R., Silverberg G. & Soete L. (eds.) Technical change and economic theory. Pinter, London: 38–66. << Google Scholar

Freud S. (1930) Das Unbehagen in der Kultur. Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag, Vienna. << Google Scholar

Fuchs P. (2004) Der Sinn der Beobachtung. Weilerswist, Velbrück. << Google Scholar

Garfield E. (1975) The “obliteration phenomenon” in science – and the advantage of being obliterated. Current Contents 51/52: 396–398. << Google Scholar

Göbel A. (2000) Theoriegenese als Problemgenese. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag Konstanz. << Google Scholar

Giddens A. (1976) New rules of sociological method. Hutchinson, London. << Google Scholar

Giddens A. (1979) Central problems in social theory. Macmillan, London. << Google Scholar

Giddens A. (1984) The constitution of society. Polity Press, Cambridge. << Google Scholar

Gilbert G. N. & Mulkay M. J. (1984) Opening Pandora’s box. A sociological analysis of scientists’ discourse. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. << Google Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (1981) The concepts of adaptation and viability in a radical constructivist theory of knowledge. In: Sigel I. E., Brodzinsky D. M. & Golinkoff R. M. (eds.) New directions in Piagetian theory and practice. Erlbaum: Hillsdale NJ: 87–93. Available at http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/067

Glasersfeld E. von (2008) Who conceives of society? Constructivist Foundations 3(2): 59–64 & 100–104. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/3/2/059.glasersfeld

Grant C. B. (2000) Functions and fictions of communication. Peter Lang, Oxford. << Google Scholar

Gumbrecht H. U. (2006) Luhmanns intellektuelles Vermächtnis. Merkur 60(8): 696–706. << Google Scholar

Habermas J. (1981) Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. << Google Scholar

Habermas J. (1987) Excursus on Luhmann’s appropriation of the philosophy of the subject through systems theory the philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lectures. MIT Press, Cambridge MA: 368–385. << Google Scholar

Hayles N. K. (1990) Chaos bound: Orderly disorder in contemporary literature and science. Cornell University, Ithaca. << Google Scholar

Hurford J. (2007) The origins of meaning: Language in the light of evolution. Oxford University Press, New York. << Google Scholar

Husserl E. (1962) Die Krisis der Europäischen Wissenschaften und die Transzendentale Phänomenologie. Martinus Nijhoff, Den Haag. Originally published in 1935–1936. << Google Scholar

Husserl E. (1969) Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie (Ideen I). Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague. Originally published in 1913. << Google Scholar

Husserl E. (1973) Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge [Cartesian meditations and the Paris lectures]. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague. Originally published in 1929. << Google Scholar

Innis H. A. (1950) Empire and Communications. Clarendon Press, Oxford. << Google Scholar

Künzler J. (1987) Grundlagenprobleme der Theorie symbolisch generalisierter Kommunikationsmedien bei Niklas Luhmann. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 16(5): 317–333. << Google Scholar

Künzler J. (1989) Medien und Gesellschaft: Die Medienkonzepte von Talcott Parsons, Jürgen Habermas und Niklas Luhmann. Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart. << Google Scholar

Krippendorff K. (2008) Towards a radically social constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 3(2): 91–94. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/3/2/091.krippendorff

Latour B. (1987) Science in action. Open University Press, Milton Keynes. << Google Scholar

Latour B. (1988) The politics of explanation: An alternative. In: Woolgar S. & Ashmore M. (eds.) Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge. Sage, London: 155–177. << Google Scholar

Leydesdorff L. & Welbers K. (2011) The semantic mapping of words and co-words in contexts. Journal of Informetrics 5(3): 469–475. << Google Scholar

Leydesdorff L. & Zawdie G. (2010) The triple helix perspective of innovation systems. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 22(7): 789–804. << Google Scholar

Leydesdorff L. (1993) “Structure”/“action” contingencies and the model of parallel processing. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 23(1): 47–77. << Google Scholar

Leydesdorff L. (1995) The challenge of scientometrics: The development, measurement, and self-organization of scientific communications. DSWO Press, Leiden. << Google Scholar

Leydesdorff L. (2000) Luhmann, Habermas, and the theory of communication. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 17(3): 273–288. << Google Scholar

Leydesdorff L. (2003) “Interaction” versus “action” in Luhmann’s sociology of communication. In: Grant C. B. (ed.) Rethinking communicative interaction. John Benjamins, Amsterdam: 163–186. << Google Scholar

Leydesdorff L. (2006) The biological metaphor of a (second-order) observer and the sociological discourse. Kybernetes 35(3/4): 531–546. << Google Scholar

Leydesdorff L. (2007) Scientific communication and cognitive codification: Social systems theory and the sociology of scientific knowledge. European Journal of Social Theory 10(3): 375–388. << Google Scholar

Leydesdorff L. (2008) The communication of meaning in anticipatory systems: A simulation study of the dynamics of intentionality in social interactions. In: Dubois D. M. (ed.) Proceedings of the 8th international conference on computing anticipatory systems CASYS’07. American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings, Melville NY: 33–49. << Google Scholar

Leydesdorff L. (2010) Communicative competencies and the structuration of expectations: The creative tension between Habermas’ critical theory and Luhmann’s social systems theory. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education 7(2): 66–76. << Google Scholar

Leydesdorff L. (2010) Luhmann reconsidered: Steps towards an empirical research program in the sociology of communication. In: Grant C. (ed.) Beyond universal pragmatics: Essays in the philosophy of communication. Peter Lang, Oxford: 149–173. << Google Scholar

Leydesdorff L. (2010) Redundancy in systems which entertain a model of themselves: Interaction information and the self-organization of anticipation. Entropy 12(1): 63–79. << Google Scholar

Leydesdorff L. (2010) The communication of meaning and the structuration of expectations: Giddens’ “structuration theory” and Luhmann’s “self-organization.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61(10): 2138–2150. << Google Scholar

Leydesdorff L. (2010) The knowledge-based economy and the triple helix model. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 44: 367–417. << Google Scholar

Leydesdorff L. (2011) “Meaning” as a sociological concept: A review of the modeling, mapping, and simulation of the communication of knowledge and meaning. Social Science Information 50(3–4): 1–23. << Google Scholar

Leydesdorff L. (2012) The triple helix, quadruple helix,…, and an n-tuple of helices: Explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy 3(1): 25–35. << Google Scholar

Leydesdorff L. (2013) The triple helix of university-industry government relations. In: Carayannis E. (ed.) Encyclopedia of creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Springer, New York. In press. << Google Scholar

Leydesdorff L. (in press) Advances in science visualization: Social networks, semantic maps, and discursive knowledge. In: Cronin B. & Sugimoto C. (eds.) Next generation metrics: Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly performance. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Lucio-Arias D. & Leydesdorff L. (2008) Main-path analysis and path-dependent transitions in HistCite™-based historiograms. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(12): 1948–1962. << Google Scholar

Lucio-Arias D. & Leydesdorff L. (2009) An indicator of research front activity: Measuring intellectual organization as uncertainty reduction in document sets. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology 60(12): 2488–2498. << Google Scholar

Lucio-Arias D. & Leydesdorff L. (2009) The dynamics of exchanges and references among scientific texts, and the autopoiesis of discursive knowledge. Journal of Informetrics 3(2): 261–271. << Google Scholar

Ludes P. (1989) Drei moderne soziologische Theorien: Zur Entwicklung des Orientierungsmittels Alternativen. Otto Schwartz, Göttingen. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1971) Sinn als Grundbegriff der Soziologie. In: Habermas J. & Luhmann N. (eds.) Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main: 25–100. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1974) Einführende Bemerkungen zu einer Theorie symbolisch generalisierter Kommunikationsmedien. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 3: 236–255. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1977) Differentiation of society. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 2, 29–53. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1980) Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik: Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft I. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1981) Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik: Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft II. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1981) Gesellschaftsstrukturelle Bedingungen und Folgeprobleme der naturwissenschaftlich-technischen Fortschritts. In: Löw R., Koslowski P. & Kreuzer P. (eds.) Fortschritt ohne Maß: Eine Ortsbestimmung der wissenschaftlich-technischen Zivilisation. Piper, Munich: 112–131. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1986) Intersubjektivität oder Kommunikation: Unterschiedliche Ausgangspunkte soziologischer Theoriebildung. Archivio di Filosofia 54(1–3): 41–60. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1986) The autopoiesis of social systems. In: Geyer F. & van der Zouwen J. (eds.) Sociocybernetic paradoxes. Sage, London: 172–192. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1989) Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik: Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft III. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1990) Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1991) Die Form “Person.” Soziale Welt 42(2): 166–175. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1994) Die Tücke des Subjekts und die Frage nach den Menschen. In: Fuchs P. & Göbel A. (eds.) Der Mensch – Das Medium der Gesellschaft? Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main : 40–56. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1995) Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik: Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft IV. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1995) Social systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA. German original: Luhman N. (1984) Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1996) On the scientific context of the concept of communication. Social Science Information 35(2): 257–267. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1997) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1998) Observations on modernity. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (2000) Organisation und Entscheidung. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (2002) How can the mind participate in communication? In: Rasch W. (ed.) Theories of distinction: Redescribing the descriptions of modernity. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA: 169–184. << Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (2002) The modern sciences and phenomenology. In: Rasch W. (ed.) Theories of distinction: Redescribing the descriptions of modernity. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA: 33–60. << Google Scholar

Marx K. (1973) Grundrisse: Foundations of the critique of political economy (rough draft) Penguin, Harmondsworth. German original published in 1858. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. R. & Varela F. (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Reidel, Boston. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. R. & Verden-Zöller G. (2008) The origin of humanness in the biology of love. Imprint Academic, Exeter UK. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. R. (1978) Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In: Miller G. & Lenneberg E. (eds.) Psychology and biology of language and thought: Essays in honor of Eric Lenneberg. Academic Press, New York: 27–63. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. R. (2000) The nature of the laws of nature. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 17: 459–468. << Google Scholar

Mead G. H. (1934) The point of view of social behaviourism. In: Morris C. H. (ed.) Mind, self, & society from the standpoint of a social behaviourist. Works of G. H. Mead, Volume 1. University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 1–41. << Google Scholar

Merton R. K. (1957) Social theory and social structure. Revised edition. The Free Press, Glencoe IL. Originally published in 1949. << Google Scholar

Montesquieu C.-L. de (1949) The spirit of laws. Translated by Thomas Nugent. Hafner Press, New York. French original was published in 1748 as: De l’esprit des lois. << Google Scholar

Mulkay M., Potter J. & Yearley S. (1983) Why an analysis of scientific discourse is needed. In: Knorr K. D. & Mulkay M. J. (eds.) Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science. Sage, London: 171–204. << Google Scholar

Myers G. (1985) Texts as knowledge claims: The social construction of two biology articles. Social Studies of Science 15: 593–630. << Google Scholar

Parsons T. (1951) The social system. The Free Press, New York. << Google Scholar

Parsons T. (1963) On the concept of influence. Public Opinion Quarterly 27: 37–62. << Google Scholar

Parsons T. (1963) On the concept of political power. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 107(3): 232–262. << Google Scholar

Parsons T. (1968) Interaction: I. Social interaction. In: Sills D. L. (ed.) The international encyclopedia of the social sciences, Volume 7. McGraw-Hill, New York: 429–441. << Google Scholar

Rosen R. (1985) Anticipatory systems: Philosophical, mathematical and methodological foundations. Pergamon Press, Oxford. << Google Scholar

Schutz A. (1967) The phenomenology of the social world. Translated by G. Walsh & F. Lehnert. Northwestern University, Evanston IL. German original: Schütz A. (1932) Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt. Springer, Vienna. << Google Scholar

Seidl D. & Becker K. H. (2006) Organizations as distinction generating and processing systems: Niklas Luhmann’s contribution to organization studies. Organization 13(1): 9–35. << Google Scholar

Serres M. (1980) Le parasite. B. Grasset, Paris. << Google Scholar

Simon H. A. (1973) Does scientific discovery have a logic? Philosophy of Science 40(4): 471–480. << Google Scholar

Simon H. A. (1973) The organization of complex systems. In: Pattee H. H. (ed.) Hierarchy theory: The challenge of complex systems. George Braziller, New York: 1–27. << Google Scholar

Strydom P. (1999) Triple contingency: The theoretical problem of the public in communication societies. Philosophy & Social Criticism 25(2): 1–25. << Google Scholar

Van den Daele W., Krohn W. & Weingart P. (1977) The political direction of scientific development. In: Mendelsohn E., Weingart P. & Whitley R. (eds.) The social production of scientific knowledge. Reidel, Dordrecht: 219–242. << Google Scholar

Varela F. J., Thompson E. & Rosch E. (1991) The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Weber M. (1968) Die Objektivität sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis. In: Weber M., Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Mohr, Tübingen: 146–214. Originally published in 1904. << Google Scholar

Weber M. (1968) Wissenschaft als Beruf. In: Weber M., Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Mohr, Tübingen: 582–613. Originally published in 1919. << Google Scholar

Whitley R. D. (1984) The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford University Press, Oxford. << Google Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.