“The Economy of Sexual identity: Subcapitalist semantic theory and constructivism”

If one examines material narrative, one is faced with a choice: either reject Sartreist existentialism or conclude that the significance of the participant is social comment, given that consciousness is interchangeable with narrativity. Lyotard uses the term ‘material narrative’ to denote a self-falsifying totality. It could be said that in A Portrait of the Artist As a Young Man, Joyce affirms constructivism; in Dubliners, however, he denies subcapitalist semantic theory.

The subject is contextualised into a that includes sexuality as a paradox. Thus, if material narrative holds, we have to choose between subcapitalist semantic theory and neotextual nationalism.

Schlüssig, nicht? Der Postmodernism Generator, der diesen Text ausgespuckt hat, hat zwar schon einige Jahre auf dem Buckel, ist aber immer noch eine geniale Idee: “The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the Postmodernism Generator.”

Das Programm wurde 1996 geschrieben, also in dem Jahr, in dem auch die sogenannte “Sokal-Affäre” für Aufregung sorgte: Der Physiker Alan Sokal schaffte es, in der Cultural Studies-Zeitschrift Social Text diesen Hoax-Artikel zu veröffentlichen; es folgte ein Science War unter anderem mit Bruno Latour.

This entry was posted on Donnerstag, Dezember 18th, 2008 at 13:47 and is filed under Theorie. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.