SS 2012 | SE | 2Std. | LVA 180011 | http://www.univie.ac.at/knowledge/peschl/teaching/master_se/

Master Thesis Seminar in Cognitive Science & Philosophy of Science

ao.Univ.Prof.Dr. Markus Peschl

University of Vienna

 

site navigation:

Home/Syllabus

Registration

Tutor

Contact

> Syllabus/Home


page navigation: syllabus & contents | topics & dates| grading | student conference | contact | ressources|


Syllabus, Contents, and Learning Outcomes

up

Content

This course is a masters thesis seminar and gives support to students writing their masters thesis in the fields of philosophy of science, cognitive science (including the Middle European interdisciplinary Joint Master Program in Cognitive Science (MEi:CogSci)), and/or knowledge technologies. It is designed as an interdisciplinary course where students can present and discuss their current work, issues and problems, and their plans for their thesis. It gives room both for presentations and discussions.

The course is designed in such a way that there will be enough space for reflection of your research projects and your questions.

Students of the MEi:CogSci Joint masters program participate in the process of the MEi:CogSci student conference (paper writing, peer-reviewing, presentation at the conmference, etc.)

Learning Outcomes & Goals

Subject specific

  • Depends on the current topics and reserach questions
  • Gain insight into the field and scientific culture of respective fields and research questions
  • Understanding and awareness of problems in processes of writing a masters thesis
  • Awareness of the differences in scientific cultures and terminologies
  • Understanding of the relationship between natural sciences, humanities, and other forms of scientific and (so-called) non-scientific knowledge, as well as scientific work in progress

Methodological

  • Gain familiarity with methods of knowledge creation, of writing a thesis, of online/offline resercah methods relevant in scientific processes
  • Gain familiarity with a range of methodological and epistemological approaches and their methodologies relevant to philosophy of science, cognitive science, and knowledge technologies and discern differences and commonalities between them
  • Gain familiarity with peer-review processes and presentations for scientific conference

Generic

Instrumental

  • Ability to read, present, and discuss relevant literature
  • Understanding and awareness of problems in processes of writing a masters thesis
  • Ability to critically think and to reflect on different approaches in an interdisciplinary context
  • Ability to work both in an analytical and synthetic mode
  • Ability to assume a meta-perspective and to think in larger contexts
  • Ability to reflect on one’s implicit assumptions concerning one’s discipline or approach

Interpersonal

  • Ability to communicate in physical and virtual environments
  • Ability to discuss different points of view in an interdisciplinary team
  • Ability to appreciate individual expertise

Systemic

  • Ability to reflect upon and discuss individual motivation and interests in the context of ones personal and scientific identity
Teaching Methods & Course Design

This course makes use of the following didactical elements:

  • preparing presentations and whole didactical designs for presenting a specific masters thesis
  • discussion of open questions, problems, methodological issues, etc.
  • feedback
  • team sessions: these are open sessions for student questions, input on reserach methods, etc.
  • inputs concerning online reserach methods
Target Group

This course is mainly designed as an advanced philosophy of science and cognitive science course for advanced masters students. It is open for students from all disciplines who are writing their masters thesis in the fields of philosophy of science, cognitive science, and/or knowledge technologies. This course is explicitly designed for an interdisciplinary audience; students are expected to be open to other disciplines/perspectives, to share their knowledge, to reflect their (hidden) assumptions, as well as to be involved personally.

 

 

 

 

Topics, dates, and locations

up

 

 

Unit
Date/Time Location Theme
1

March 5, 2012

12-14

HS 2i, NIG

Introduction & community building

  • Presentation of course design, contents, learning outcomes, etc.
  • Introduction of students and teachers
  • Selecting topics and setting up presentations
  • Register for this seminar here!
2

March 9, 2012

14.00-17.00
HS 3E, NIG

Team session

Exchanging knowledge, thoughts, feelings etc. regarding the following topics in a relaxed atmosphere:

  • Status quo (where are you now, defining goals and timeframe, finding out if there are special personal needs)
  • Master Thesis Concept
  • Short presentation; Long presentation
  • Deadlines
3

April 19, 2012

10-13

HS 3F, NIG (!)

Presentations & Discussions

  • short presentation of masters thesis topics
  • presentations & discussions
4

April 30, 2012

9-13

HS 2i, NIG

Presentations & Discussions

  • check-in
  • presentations & discussions
6

May 3, 2012

9-13

HS 3F, NIG (!)

Presentations & Discussions

  • check-in
  • presentations & discussions
8

May 10, 2012

9.30-13

HS 3F, NIG (!)

Presentations & Discussions

  • check-in
  • presentations & discussions
9

May 11, 2012

14.00-17.00
HS 3E, NIG

Research methods & team session

  • Reflection of work status (what did/ did not work)
  • Abstract (upload procedure)
  • Deadlines
 

June 1, 2012

14.00-17.00
HS 2H, NIG

Research methods & team session

  • Conference presentation
  • Future goals
11

June 22, 2012

9-20

University of Bratislava

MEi:CogSci Student Conference

12

June 23, 2012

9-19

University of Bratislava

MEi:CogSci Student Conference

 

 

 

Grading and academic honesty

up

Grading

There are two paradigms of grading:

 

A| presentation & term paper

For completing this course you are supposed to give a presentation of your work, you have to be present for all classes, and write a term paper ("Seminararbeit")

 

work points/weight
presentation in seminar 50%
term paper 50%
  • You have to deliver both a presentation and a term paper. If one of them is missing this will result in a negative grade.
  • With registering for this course in the first session you commit yourself to participating in this course and you are subject to receiving a grade.
 

 

Criteria for term paper:

 

B| Presentation and student conference participation (this option is compulsory for all MEi:CogSci students!)

This option is compulsory for MEi:CogSci students, however it is open also for students not enrolled in this program

 

work points/weight
Presentation in seminar 25%

Interdisciplinary extended abstract/paper for MEi:CogSci student conference

Criteria for MEi:CogSci student conference abstract/paper:

  • in the style of an extended abstract
  • in the style of a scientific paper (title, research question(s), review of existing reserach, arguments, citations, etc.)
  • length: 2-3 pages
  • use the template from the MEi:CogSci Conference-WWW-pages
  • deadline: see review process of MEi:CogSci student conference
  • papers which are received after this deadline will not be consiederd for the final grade!
30%
Active participation in the peer-review process of the MEi:CogSci student conference 20%
Presentation at the MEi:CogSci student conference 25%
  • If one of these outcomes is missing this will result in a negative grade.
  • With registering for this course in the first session you commit yourself to participating in this course and you are subject to receiving a grade.
 

 

 

 

Final Grading

 

points/%
93-100
81-92
71-80
61-70
0-60
grade
sehr gut (1)
gut (2)
befriedigend (3)
genügend (4)
nicht genügend (5)

 

 

Academic honesty

You are expected to be familiar with university policies on plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty. By registering for this course/module you declare that all your work (presentations, submissions, papers, etc.) is your own work and that, to the best of your knowledge and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by another person nor material which to a substantial extent has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at this or any other educational institution. In addition, you certify that all information sources and literature used are indicated in your work.

Plagiarism or cheating will result in a failing grade for this course; offenders may be subject to further administrative sanctions.

 

Contact

up

 

You can find ao.Univ.Prof.Dr. Markus Peschl s here (map)

 

Resources

up

 

 

 


last update | version 1.2 up up
© M.F.Peschl Counter

site navigation:

Home/Syllabus

Registration

Tutor

Contact