Next: Conclusion
Up: Astrophysical considerations
Previous: The nature of the
The mean (d, B2-V1)-values place both stars well within the
Scuti instability strip as observed in the Geneva Photometric
System. We note the interesting situation that two stars having such similar
characteristics behave quite differently from the variability point-of-view.
In the previous sections we have shown that the brightest component has a
Scuti type of variability with a total amplitude of 0.05 mag while the
fainter component presents no short-period variability of amplitude larger
than 0.01 mag. What could the causes be for the different variability
behaviour between both? From the Geneva colour indices, it appears that the
brightest component has
,
thus it is somewhat more evolved
than its companion.
Can we identify any pulsation mode for HD 220392? The physical parameters of
Table 4 may be used for the computation of the pulsation constant Q:
log Q = log(f-1) + 0.5 log(
)
+ 0.3
Mhtmlcommentmark>73
bol + 3 log(
Teff) -12.697.
The propagation of errors shows that the error on the pulsation constant is
of order 0.003 days (0.07 on
). The results are given in
Table 6. The values thus computed are on the high side for a definitive mode
identification: the only conclusion one could draw is that the frequency
f2 possibly corresponds to the fundamental radial mode (F).
The frequency ratio f2/f1, 0.84, here is not very helpful either.
Additional photometric observations for this interesting couple of stars is highly
recommended. The already obtained data are neither sufficiently numerous nor of
sufficient quality to allow unambiguous solutions or to solve for the multiple
frequencies. Radial velocities would be needed too.
Because professional observatories no longer offer regular photometric facilities
(especially in the southern hemisphere), we invite any seriously interested party
that has the adequate instrumentation to an intensive but easy monitoring of this
southern system.
Table 5:
Q-values for HD 220392
| Identifier |
Frequency |
log Q |
Q |
Comment |
|
[cpd] |
[days] |
[days] |
|
|
HD 220392 |
4.674 |
-1.358 |
0.044
0.003 |
|
|
|
5.522 |
-1.431 |
0.037
0.003 |
F? |
|
|
(6.522) |
-1.501 |
0.032
0.003 |
(F?) |
Next: Conclusion
Up: Astrophysical considerations
Previous: The nature of the
Wolfgang Zima
1999-09-09