Volume 5 · Number 1 · Pages 64-65

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

What You Always Wanted to Know About Constructivist Education... Review of “Constructivist Instruction: Success or Failure?” edited by Sigmund Tobias & Thomas M. Duffy

Hugh Gash

Download the full text in
PDF (136 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Upshot: Is education about memorising or about making meaning? Critics of constructivist instruction argue that it is more efficient to teach directly. However, there is an empowering engagement to making meaning and teachers need to know how to guide students in this process. Relevance: Open educational approaches are often attacked on the grounds that education should be about learning (memorising) important things like maths and reading. This book opens up this debate and shows the value of inquiry in classrooms with due attention to desirable learning of skills.

Key words: Constructivist approaches, education,

Citation

Gash H. (2009) What you always wanted to know about constructivist education... Review of “constructivist instruction: Success or failure?” edited by sigmund tobias & thomas m. Duffy. Constructivist Foundations 5(1): 64-65. http://constructivist.info/5/1/064

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Riegler A. (2005) Editorial. The Constructivist Challenge

Gash H. (2018) Constructivisms and Ivo Kohler’s Goggles

Gash H. (2014) The need for varieties of perspectives

Gash H. (2010) Nativist Constraints on Cognitive Processes Called into Question. Review of “Neoconstructivism. The New Science of Cognitive Development” edited by Scott Johnson. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009.

Gash H. (2014) Modelling Realities

References

Cronbach L. J. & Snow R. E. (1977) Aptitudes and instructional methods. Irvington, New York. << Google Scholar

Harris P. & Koenig M. (2006) Trust in testimony: How children learn about science and religion. Child Development 77: 505–524. << Google Scholar

Kirschner P. A., Sweller J. & Clark R. E. (2006) Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist 4(2): 75–86. << Google Scholar

US National Mathematics Advisory Panel (2008) Special issue on Foundations for success: The final report of the US National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Educational Researcher 37(9). << Google Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.