Volume 6 · Number 2 · Pages 152–156

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

From Jean Piaget to Ernst von Glasersfeld: An Epistemological Itinerary in Review

Jean-Louis Le Moigne

Download the full text in
PDF (243 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment


Problem: While the elaboration and framing of constructivist epistemologies in keeping with the “currents of contemporary scientific epistemology” can be attributed to Jean Piaget, their development under the banner of radical constructivist epistemology is a result of the epistemological work of Ernst von Glasersfeld. The development of this epistemological paradigm, pursued over the last 40 years with the objective of “linking knowledge to action and situating the subject and the object on the same, multiple levels,” warrants further exploration and contextualization within the framework of current scientific activity. Results: In what amounts to a historical coincidence, von Glasersfeld discovered the work of Piaget in 1973, the same year that the author of this article first began to read Piaget’s Epistemological Studies; this coincidence provides a starting point for describing the epistemological itinerary that led the author from a reading of Piaget in 1973 to a somewhat tardy reading of von Glasersfeld in 1988 (the same year of the translation of his “Introduction to Radical Constructivism” into French). He then explicates the subsequent developments of this paradigmatic conjunction over the last 30 years, interpreting them in the contexts of contemporary developments of scientific and operational interdisciplinarity as well as in terms of historical roots extending from Leonardo da Vinci to Paul Valéry. Implications: The paradigm of constructivist epistemologies (working from a phenomenologically-based gnoseological hypothesis) can be presented and supported with arguments that are at least as solid and legitimate as those invoked in favor of alternative paradigms of realist and post-positivist epistemologies (working from an ontologically-based gnoseological hypothesis).

Key words: contemporary scientific epistemology, non-Cartesian epistemology, gnoseological hypothesis, phenomenology, teleology, viability


Le Moigne J.-L. (2011) From jean piaget to ernst von glasersfeld: An epistemological itinerary in review. Constructivist Foundations 6(2): 152–156. http://constructivist.info/6/2/152

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Müller K. H. (2011) The Two Epistemologies of Ernst von Glasersfeld

Kordeš U. (2016) Going Beyond Theory: Constructivism and Empirical Phenomenology

Depraz N. (2013) An Experiential Phenomenology of Novelty: The Dynamic Antinomy of Attention and Surprise

Vörös S. (2014) The Uroboros of Consciousness: Between the Naturalisation of Phenomenology and the Phenomenologisation of Nature

Bednarz N. & Proulx J. (2011) Ernst von Glasersfeld’s Contribution and Legacy to a Didactique des Mathématiques Research Community


Bachelard G. (1934) Le nouvel esprit scientifique. PUF, Paris. English translation: Bachelard G. (1985) The new scientific spirit. Beacon Press, Boston. << Google Scholar

Barel Y. (1979) Le paradoxe et le système. Presses universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble. << Google Scholar

Bogdanov A. (1980) Essays in Tektology, (Translated by G. Gorelik) Intersystems publications, Seaside CA. Russian original published in 1913. << Google Scholar

Demailly A. (2004) Herbert Simon et les sciences de conception. Collection Ingénium. L’Harmattan, Paris. << Google Scholar

Foerster H. von (1972) Notes on an epistemology for living things. BCL Report. No. 9.3 (BCL Fiche No. 104/1), Biological Computer Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana IL. Reprinted in: Foerster H. von (1981) Observing systems. Intersystems Publications, Seaside CA: 258–265. << Google Scholar

Foerster H. von (1976) Objects: Tokens for (eigen-)behaviors. ASC Cybernetics Forum 8(3–4): 91–96. Reprinted in: Foerster H. von (1981) Observing systems. Intersystems Publications, Seaside CA: 274–285. << Google Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (1981) Introduction au constructivisme radical. In Watzlawick P. (ed.) L’invention de la réalité. Seuil, Paris: 19–53. Originally published in German in 1981. English translation: Glasersfeld E. von (1984) An introduction to radical constructivism. In: Watzlawick P. (ed.) The invented reality. Norton, New York: 17–40. << Google Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (1987) The construction of knowledge: Contributions to conceptual semantics. Intersystems, Salinas CA. << Google Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (1999) Le Moigne’s defense of constructivism. In: GRASCE, Entre systémique et complexité, chemin faisant [Between systemics and complexity – making the way]. PUF, Paris: 85–90. Available at http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/225

Glasersfeld E. von (2005) Thirty years constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 1(1): 9–12. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/1/1/009.glasersfeld Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/1/1/009.glasersfeld

Glasersfeld E. von (2007) Aspects of constructivism. Vico, Berkeley, Piaget. In: Glasersfeld E. von, Key works in radical constructivism. Edited by Marie Larochelle. Sense, Rotterdam: 91–99. Originally published in Italian as: Glasersfeld E. von (1992) Aspetti del costruttivismo: Vico, Berkeley, Piaget. In: Ceruti M. (ed.) Evoluzione e conoscenza. Lubrina, Bergamo: 421–432. << Google Scholar

Guba E. (ed.) (1990) The paradigm dialog. SAGE, Newbury Park CA. << Google Scholar

Larochelle M. & Désautels J. (2007) Concerning Ernst von Glasersfeld’s contribution to intellectual freedom: One interpretation, one example. Constructivist Foundations 2(2–3): 90–97. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/2/2–3/090.larochelle

Larochelle M. (2007) Connaitre, n’est ce pas décrire ce que l’on peut faire dans le monde? Available at http://www.mcxapc.org/docs/conseilscient/0701rochelle.pdf

Le Moigne J. L. (1981) Systémique et épistémologie. In: Lesourne J. (ed.) La notion de systèmes dans les sciences contemporaines. Tome II: épistémologie. Éditions de la Librairie de l’Université, Aix en Provence: 149–317. << Google Scholar

Le Moigne J. L. (1995) Les épistémologies constructivistes. PUF, Paris. << Google Scholar

Le Moigne J. L. (2002) Le constructivisme. 2 volumes. Collection Ingénium – L’Harmattan, Paris. << Google Scholar

Morin E. (1973) Le paradigme perdu. Seuil, Paris. << Google Scholar

Morin E. (1977) La méthode. Tome I: La nature de la nature. Seuil, Paris. << Google Scholar

Morin E. (1982) Science avec conscience. Fayard, Paris. << Google Scholar

Morin E. (1986) La méthode. Tome III: La connaissance de la connaissance. Seuil, Paris   << Google Scholar

Piaget J. (1937) La construction du réel chez l’enfant. Delachaux et Niestlé, Neuchâtel. English translation: Piaget J. (1954) The construction of reality in the child. Basic Books, New York. << Google Scholar

Piaget J. (1970) L’épistémologie génétique. PUF, Paris. English translation: Piaget J. (1972) Principles of genetic epistemology. Routlege & Kegan Paul, New York. << Google Scholar

Piaget J. (1970) Psychologie et épistémologie. Pour une théorie de la connaissance. Denoel-Gonthier, Paris. English translation: Piaget J. (1972) Psychology and epistemology: towards a theory of knowledge. Penguin, Harmondsworth. << Google Scholar

Piaget J. (ed.) (1967) Logique et connaissance scientifique. Encyclopédie Pléiade. Gallimard, Paris. << Google Scholar

Simon H. (1969) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Simon H. (1983) Reason in human affairs. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA. << Google Scholar

Valéry P. (1958) Cahiers XIII. Editions du CNRS, Paris. << Google Scholar

Valéry P. (1973) Cahiers. Tome I. Gallimard (Collection Pléiade), Paris. << Google Scholar

Valéry P. (1974) Cahiers. Tome II. Gallimard (Collection Pléiade), Paris. << Google Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.