Volume 9 · Number 1 · Pages 26–33

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

Exploration of the Functional Properties of Interaction: Computer Models and Pointers for Theory

Etienne B. Roesch, Matthew Spencer, Slawomir J. Nasuto, Thomas Tanay & John Mark Bishop

Download the full text in
PDF (940 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment


Context: Constructivist approaches to cognition have mostly been descriptive, and now face the challenge of specifying the mechanisms that may support the acquisition of knowledge. Departing from cognitivism, however, requires the development of a new functional framework that will support causal, powerful and goal-directed behavior in the context of the interaction between the organism and the environment. Problem: The properties affecting the computational power of this interaction are, however, unclear, and may include partial information from the environment, exploration, distributed processing and aggregation of information, emergence of knowledge and directedness towards relevant information. Method: We posit that one path towards such a framework may be grounded in these properties, supported by dynamical systems. To assess this hypothesis, we describe computational models inspired from swarm intelligence, which we use as a metaphor to explore the practical implications of the properties highlighted. Results: Our results demonstrate that these properties may serve as the basis for complex operations, yielding the elaboration of knowledge and goal-directed behavior. Implications: This work highlights aspects of interaction that we believe ought to be taken into account when characterizing the possible mechanisms underlying cognition. The scope of the models we describe cannot go beyond that of a metaphor, however, and future work, theoretical and experimental, is required for further insight into the functional role of interaction with the environment for the elaboration of complex behavior. Constructivist content: Inspiration for this work stems from the constructivist impetus to account for knowledge acquisition based on interaction.

Key words: Stochastic diffusion search, clustering, multi-agent system, cognitivism.


Roesch E. B., Spencer M., Nasuto S. J., Tanay T. & Bishop J. M. (2013) Exploration of the functional properties of interaction: Computer models and pointers for theory. Constructivist Foundations 9(1): 26–33. http://constructivist.info/9/1/026

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Roesch E. B., Spencer M., Nasuto S. J., Tanay T. & Bishop J. M. (2013) Authors’ Response: Learning, Anticipation and the Brain

Bishop J. M. (2016) Phenomenal Promiscuity

Roesch E. B. (2016) In Search of a New Looking Glass: Cognitive Science Is Not Dead, It Is Just Asleep


Afek Y., Alon N., Barad O., Hornstein E., Barkai N. & Bar-Joseph Z. (2011) A biological solution to a fundamental distributed computing problem. Science 331: 183–185. << Google Scholar

Anderson M. L., Richardson M. J & Chemero A. (2012) Eroding the boundaries of cognition: Implications of embodiment. Topics in Cognitive Science 4(4): 717–730. << Google Scholar

Angluin D., Aspnes J., Eisenstat D.& Ruppert E. (2007) The computational power of population protocols. Distributed Computing 20(4): 279–304. << Google Scholar

Ashby W. R. (1956) An introduction to cybernetics. Chapman and Hall, London. << Google Scholar

Öhman A., Carlsson K., Lundqvist D. & Ingvar M. (2007) On the unconscious subcortical origin of human fear. Physiology & Behavior 92(1–2): 180–185. << Google Scholar

Banchereau J. & Steinman R. M. (1998) Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature 392: 245–252. << Google Scholar

Bedau M. A. (1997) Weak emergence. Philosophical Perspectives 11: 375–399. << Google Scholar

Berdahl A., Torney C. J., Ioannou C. C., Faria J. J & Couzin I. D. (2013) Emergent sensing of complex environments by mobile animal groups. Science 339: 574–576. << Google Scholar

Bickhard M. H. & Terveen L. (1995) Foundational issues in artificial intelligence and cognitive science: Impasse and solution. Elsevier, New York. << Google Scholar

Bickhard M. H. (2006) Developmental normativity and normative development. In: Smith L. & Voneche J. (eds.) Norms in human development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 57–76. << Google Scholar

Bishop J. M. (1989) Stochastic searching networks. In: Proceedings of the First IEE conference on Artificial Neural Networks. IEE Conference Publications, London: 329–331. << Google Scholar

Boden M. A. (2006) Mind as machine: A history of cognitive science. Oxford University Press, Oxford. << Google Scholar

Braitenberg V. (1984) Vehicles: Experiments in synthetic psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Brooks R. A. (1991) Intelligence without representation. Artificial intelligence 47: 139–159. << Google Scholar

Butz M. V. (2008) How and why the brain lays the foundations for a conscious self. Constructivist Foundations 4(1): 1–14 & 32–37. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/4/1/001.butz << Google Scholar

Carello C., Turvey M., Kugler P. N. & Shaw R. E. (1984) Inadequacies of the computer metaphor. In: Gazzaniga M. S. (ed.) Handbook of cognitive neuroscience. Plenum, New York: 229–248. << Google Scholar

Cariani P. & Micheyl C. (2012) Towards a theory of infomation processing in the auditory cortex. In: Poeppel D., Overath T. & Popper A. (eds.) Human auditory cortex: Springer handbook of auditory research. Springer, New York: 351–390. << Google Scholar

Cariani P. (1989) On the design of devices with emergent semantic functions. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis at the State University of New York at Binghamton. << Google Scholar

Cariani P. (1992) Emergence and artificial life. In: Langton C. G., Taylor C., Farmer J. D. & Rasmussen S. (eds.) Artificial life II. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City CA: 775–798. << Google Scholar

Cariani P. (1995) As if time really mattered: Temporal strategies for neural coding of sensory information. Communication and Cognition – Artificial Intelligence 12(1–2): 161–229. Reprinted in: Pribram K. (ed.) (1994) Origins: Brain and self-organization. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ: 208–252. << Google Scholar

Cariani P. (1999) Temporal coding of periodicity pitch in the auditory system: An overview. Neural Plasticity 6(4): 147–172. << Google Scholar

Cariani P. (2001) Symbols and dynamics in the brain. Biosystems 60(1–3): 59–83. << Google Scholar

Cariani P. (2011) The semiotics of cybernetic percept–action systems. International Journal of Signs and Semiotic Systems 1(1): 1–17. << Google Scholar

Cariani P. (2012) Creating new primitives in minds and machines. In: McCormack J. & D’Inverno M. (eds.) Computers and creativity. Springer, New York: 395–430. << Google Scholar

Churchland P. M. (1985) The ontological status of observables. In: Churchland P. M. & Hooker C. A. (eds.) Images of Science (Chicago: University of Chicago). << Google Scholar

Churchland P. M. (2005) Functionalism at forty: A critical retrospective. The Journal of Philosophy 102(1): 33–50. << Google Scholar

Clark A. & Chalmers D. (1998) The extended mind. Analysis 58(1): 7–19. << Google Scholar

De Meyer K., Bishop J. M & Nasuto S. J. (2000) Attention through self-synchronisation in the spiking neuron stochastic diffusion network. Consciousness and Cognition 9(2): S81. << Google Scholar

Dretske F. I. (1981) Knowledge & the flow of information. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Dretske F. I. (2003) Experience as representation. Philosophical Issues 13(1): 67–82. << Google Scholar

Fodor J. A. & Pylyshin Z. W. (1988) Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition 28(1–2): 3–71. << Google Scholar

Fodor J. A. (1983) The modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Foerster H. von (1972) Notes on an epistemology for living things. BCL Report. No. 9.3 (BCL Fiche No. 104/1), Biological Computer Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana IL. Reprinted in: Foerster H. von (1981) Observing systems. Intersystems Publications, Seaside CA: 258–265. << Google Scholar

Friston K. (2009) The free-energy principle: A rough guide to the brain? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13: 293–301. << Google Scholar

Friston K. (2010) The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11: 127–138. << Google Scholar

Georgeon O. & Ritter F. (2012) An intrinsically-motivated schema mechanism to model and simulate emergent cognition. Cognitive Systems Research 15–16: 73–92. << Google Scholar

Georgeon O., Marshall J., & Gay S. (2012) Interactional motivation in artificial systems: Between extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Development and Learning, and on Epigenetic Robotics (EPIROB2012) San Diego CA: 1–2. << Google Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (1984) An introduction to radical constructivism. In: Watzlawick P. (ed.) The invented reality. Norton, New York: 17–40. Available at http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/070.1 << Google Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (1995) Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Falmer Press, London. << Google Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (2005) Thirty years radical constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 1(1): 9–12. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/1/1/009.glasersfeld << Google Scholar

Hofstadter D. R. and the Fluid Analogies Research Group (1995) Fluid concepts and creative analogies. Basic Books, New York. << Google Scholar

Korsten N., Roesch E. B., Fragopanagos N., Taylor J. G. & Sander D. (2011) Biological computational constraints to the psychological modelling of emotion. In: Petta P., Pelachaud C. & Cowie R. (eds.) Handbook for research on emotions and human-machine interactions – HUMAINE. Springer, Berlin: 132–145. << Google Scholar

Marcus G. F. (2001) The algebraic mind: Integrating connectionism and cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Reidel: Dordrecht. << Google Scholar

Minsky M. (1988) The society of mind. Simon & Schuster, New York. << Google Scholar

Nasuto S. & Bishop M. (1999) Convergence analysis of stochastic diffusion search. Parallel Algorithms and Applications 14(2): 89–107. << Google Scholar

Nasuto S. J., Bishop J. M. and De Meyer K. (2009) Communicating neurons: A connectionist spiking neuron implementation of stochastic diffusion search. Neurocomputing 72(4–6): 704–712. << Google Scholar

O’Regan J. K. & Noë A. (2001) A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(5): 939–1031. << Google Scholar

Pattee H. H. (2012) Discrete and continuous processes in computers and brains. In: Pattee H. H. & Raczaszek-Leonardi J. (eds.) Laws, language and life. Springer, Dordrecht. Originally published in: Conrad W. & Güttinger W. (eds.) (1974) Physics and mathematics of the nervous system. Springer, Berlin: 125–142. << Google Scholar

Pfeifer R. & Bongard J. C. (2006) How the body shapes the way we think: A new view of intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Piaget J. (1937) La construction du réel chez l’enfant. Delachaux & Niestlé, Neuchâtel. English translation: Piaget J. (1957) The construction of reality in the child. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London. << Google Scholar

Piaget J. (1980) The psychogenesis of knowledge and its epistemological significance. In: Piatelli-Palmarini M. (ed) Language and learning. The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA: 23–34. << Google Scholar

Rao R. P. N. & Ballard D. H. (1999) Predictive coding in the visual cortex: A functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nature Neuroscience 2: 79–87. << Google Scholar

Roesch E. B., Nasuto S. J & Bishop J. M. (2012) Emotion and anticipation in an enactive framework for cognition (Response to Andy Clark). Frontiers in Psychology 3(398): 1–2. << Google Scholar

Scheutz M. (2002) Computationalism. New Directions. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Sieg W. & Byrnes J. (1996) K-graph machines: Generalizing Turing’s machines and arguments. In: Hajek P. (ed.) Gödel ‘96. Springer, New York: 98–119. << Google Scholar

Smock C. D. & Glasersfeld E. von (1974) Epistemology and education. Follow Through Publications, Athens GA. << Google Scholar

Spencer M., Roesch E. B., Bishop J. M. & Nasuto S. J. (in press) Emergent representations from distributed interactive dynamics. In: Müller V. C. (ed.) Fundamental issues of artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin. << Google Scholar

Steels L. (2003) Evolving grounded communication for robots. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(7): 308–312 << Google Scholar

Steels L. (2004) The autotelic principle. In: Fumiya I., Pfeifer R., Steels L., & Kunyoshi K. (eds.) Embodied artificial intelligence. Springer, New York: 231–242. << Google Scholar

Steels L. (2008) The symbol grounding problem has been solved. So What’s next? In: de Vega M. (ed.) Symbols and embodiment: Debates on meaning and cognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 223–244. << Google Scholar

Thagard P. (1988) Computational philosophy of science. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Tomasello M. (2003) Constructing a language. A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Turing A. M. (1936) On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society (Series 2) 42: 230–265. << Google Scholar

van Leeuwen J. & Wiedermann J. (2006) A theory of interactive computation. In: Goldin D., Smolka S. & Wegner P. (eds.) Interactive computation: The new paradigm. Springer, New York: 119–142. << Google Scholar

Wheeler M. (2005) Reconstructing the cognitive world. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. << Google Scholar

Wiedermann J. & van Leeuwen J. (2002) The emergent computational potential of evolving artificial living systems. AI Communications 15(4): 205–216. << Google Scholar

Wiedermann J. & van Leeuwen J. (2013) Rethinking computation. In: Proceedings of the Sixth AISB Symposium on Computing and Philosophy: “The scandal of computing: What is computation?” University of Exeter, Exeter UK: 6–10. << Google Scholar

Wiedermann J. (2013) The many forms of amorphous computational systems. In: Zenil H. (ed.) A computable universe: Understanding and exploring nature as computation. World Scientific: Singapore: 243–256. << Google Scholar

Wolfram S. (2002) A new kind of science. Wolfram Media, Champaign IL. << Google Scholar

Wolpert D. H. & Macready W. G. (1997) No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 1: 67–82. << Google Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.